Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist expects Boy Scouts to change, but not soon
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | 12/30/02 | JOHN IWASAKI

Posted on 01/03/2003 8:35:59 AM PST by RonF

Darrell Lambert is prepared for a long struggle with the Boy Scouts of America, one decided by public opinion and not by lawsuits.

The 19-year-old Eagle Scout, the subject of national attention after being booted out of the organization last month for being an atheist, doesn't think his recent appeal will reverse his situation. Not soon, anyway.

Darrell Lambert of Olalla, who was kicked out of the Boy Scouts for being an atheist, has appealed the decision. But he says he won't go to court. "I'd like them to realize it is the moral thing to do."

"I think eventually the Boy Scouts will change," the Olalla teen said yesterday. "It'll just take longer than I like."

Lambert, who earned 37 merit badges in 10 years and assisted in leading a Port Orchard troop, sent his appeal last week to the Scouts' Western Region office in Tempe, Ariz. His letter started a process that likely could take months to resolve.

...

"Legally, (the Scouts) have a right to discriminate," Lambert said at a presentation on the issue yesterday. "Morally, they don't. That's what I'm fighting. They can't teach good citizenship and practice bad citizenship."

(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; bsa; bsalist; lpfagsfor; scouts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-413 next last
To: roadcat
But, if a requirement of joining is to profess a belief in God and abide by moral laws, then I'm obligated to play by the rules because of my abiding by morals set down by the All-Mighty.

Then it becomes a problem of determining just what the 'morals set down by the All-Mighty' really are. That's been a matter of dispute for millenia.

So I believe there can't be morals without God.

So if someone cannot bring themself to believe in a God even after studying whatever evidence might be available, are they morally inferior to someone who believes without question?

Isn't it more honest for someone to admit that they have to make their own rules and see how that works out rather than appealing to some supernatural entity as a provider for 'absolute morality'?
61 posted on 01/03/2003 12:32:22 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RonF
It's refreshing to see someone lay out the facts as you did rather than resorting to name-calling. More posts of that type is exactly what this forum needs.
62 posted on 01/03/2003 12:33:07 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Actually, in looking at the Spiral Scout's web site, it seems that they do acknowledge a spiritual side to the universe. So they wouldn't qualify as atheist.

Atheism does not preclude a belief in spirituality, though such a belief would not be common amongst atheists. Athiesm is simply a lack belief in gods, thus a worldview where 'spirits' exist but gods do not is still atheistic in nature.
63 posted on 01/03/2003 12:34:25 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Diverdogz
Beleivers make living with consequeses easier by getting saved, praying, going to confession or any other manner of claiming forgiveness from god.

An interesting point. The fact that one can be forgiven by God for any kind of sin is often used by those professing faith to believe that once they petition for forgiveness, then they are free of sin and should not face consequences from man or God. But they are incorrect in this belief, as far as I believe. The fact that a leader can be forgiven for abusing his or her position of trust doesn't mean that they should be allowed to remain in that position of leadership (Congress and Bishops take note). This error is why we see so many leaders beg for forgiveness, but then try to hang on to their office.

The fact that a convict can turn over a new leaf and be legitimately penitent for their sins doesn't mean that they shouldn't have to continue to bear the consequences of the act they are penitent for. In fact, I'd argue that a person who is truly penitent wouldn't seek to retain their power and privileges. Although the interests of mercy (a concept I hope not limited to those with religion) might intervene here, depending on the sin/crime involved.

The receipt of forgiveness can ease the pain in your soul that results from having offended God, but it should not ease the pain and guilt you feel from having imposed suffering on others. You still need to seek them out and make what recompense is possible to meet your obligation to them; that obligation is not obviated by God's forgiveness. In fact, there are those who would hold that God's forgiveness is contingent on this.

64 posted on 01/03/2003 12:38:24 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Thank you. I try. In fact, I'm well aware that I am in general more liberal than most posters on FR, so I make an effort to stick to facts and stay away from the ad hominem and personal stuff.
65 posted on 01/03/2003 12:40:47 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
If someone professes a spiritual belief, that there's a power greater than man in the universe that is not wholly material, then as far as the BSA is concerned that person is not an atheist and meets the membership requirements. You need not believe in an incarnate or revealed God to be in the BSA.
66 posted on 01/03/2003 12:43:06 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Can you tell I've been reading about the BSA lately?

Aaah, you're one of those! I'll respond and then let it be. Your style of arguing indicates that your mind is made up. Please ignore the following waste of bandwidth.

BSA even lays claim to the name "scout"

The name is essentially a trademark and if the BSA have rights to it, great! Other organizations have secured rights to their own names. Competitors would do well to have a unique and memorable name that doesn't include "scout" if they don't want to be confused with the BSA. While I regret musing about "Gay Scouts", I still thank you for the information about the naming rights.

Then, the BSA receives donations from our military (courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer)

If you're referring to the combined federal campaign, donors have a choice of which organizations to donate to. If you're not referring to the cfc, provide your evidence. Not that it matters. The Scouts and the military have a long relationship. Jamborees and such are routinely held on military grounds because of the superior facilities. Troops traveling across country can stay in unused barracks at reduced cost. Units ocassionally sponsor Explorer posts and allow the kids to have some fun adventures (confidence courses, helicopter rides, etc.). Some of their best NCOs and officers will emerge from these experiences.

a few parks are maintained for the sole use of the BSA;

Which parks? Federal? State? County? Regardless, the actual "maintainence" is likely done by the scouts themselves. Service projects! Hardly a burden to the taxpayers considering the millions of acres of land that they are also excluded from isn't maintained at all. See this summer's fires.

and a scout automatically can qualify for a level two grades higher than anyone else upon admission into the military.

There is a slant in this and I question your source. Scouting builds the kind of character development, self-discipline and leadership employers, colleges, and *heaven forbid* even the military require. If perks are given to Eagle Scouts (a pay grade, or higher rank), fine by me. If an organization discriminates in favor of an Eagle Scout, great! They clearly know more about what goes into making an Eagle Scout than you.

It is a federally-protected government monopoly

*yawn* Congress giving the program two-thumbs up does not make it a government monopoly. The BSA could drop this charter that bugs you so much and still find a way to disappoint you. Congress gives medals to people, too. Does that mean that valour or service to country is a virtue monopolized by the government?

requires a religious test upon entrance.

Again, a slant. Name the religion you have to follow to be in the BSA. Can't be done, there is no preference. The only requirement is an avowed belief in a higher power- something that is allowed under that "free exercise" clause that people forget about. I've known Jewish Scouts, a Taoist scout, several Navajo Cub Scouts, and even a goddes-type pagan who lit candles and hummed. The word "God" in the requirement is generic to avoid the silliness of saying God/Gods/Goddess/Ganesha, et al. Swearing on the Bible is more of a "religious test" than anything the Scouts require.

Oh, since you've been reading so much... did you know that every NASA mission has had a Scout on it? I smell a rat.

67 posted on 01/03/2003 12:46:12 PM PST by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RonF
OTOH, if you believe that there is some kind of God in the universe, but that the rules of the universe have not been revealed by the methods/acts professed by the various religions but are instead determinable by observation and meditation, that might fit the definition of Deism.
68 posted on 01/03/2003 12:46:38 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Aw heck, I could have just skipped my posting. You said it all and much better!
69 posted on 01/03/2003 12:47:20 PM PST by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: McNoggin
...proof of the exhistance of GOD would be the antithesis of the idea of faith

LOL! And knowing tomorrow's lotto numbers would be the antithesis of the idea of luck!

Not really, but the direction of logic is circular either way.

70 posted on 01/03/2003 12:51:32 PM PST by Van Jenerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RonF
read later
71 posted on 01/03/2003 12:54:15 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper
Jamborees and such are routinely held on military grounds because of the superior facilities.

If I may. The National Jamboree is held at Fort A.P. Hill in Virginia. This is widely given as an example that the BSA is subsidized by the Feds. But, in fact, the reason that this is in the public interest is training.

Fort A.P. Hill is a training base. You may note that the USA has cause to post large numbers of military troops in the field on short notice. These people have to fight. In order to effectively fight, they need to be provided with nutritious and safe food, potable water, sanitary hygiene facilities, electricity, gas, etc. They may be doing this at any given location for 10,000 or more people at a time.

Now, you can set this stuff up and play with it all you want, but if you really want to see if your materials, policies, procedures and personnel can really do this job, there's only one way to test it; actually do it.

Now, if you do this for 35,000 active duty personnel, then there's 35,000 active duty personnel you've pulled out of whatever else they're doing, and you have to pay them. But if you do it for the Boy Scouts, then you've trained your personnel and tested out your policies, procedures, and materials at a much lower cost. And Boy Scouts have got a command structure and discipline that not only is similar to the military, but ensures that if there are difficulties they can be discovered and dealt with effectively. Also, Boy Scouts are used to sleeping in tents on the ground in the rain, eating perhaps not perfectly prepared food, drinking water that's got a few floaties, and regard using properly maintained port-a-potties for a whole week as a step up.

Plus, the Boy Scouts bring and set up their own tents and cook and pay for their own food.

So the American taxpayer gets benefit from having the Jamboree at Fort A.P. Hill that's entirely independent from the benefit provided to 35,000 of some of the more patriotic youth of America.

72 posted on 01/03/2003 12:59:29 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper
That's all right, nice to know there's someone else out there!
73 posted on 01/03/2003 12:59:59 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Excellent explanation. Again, we are not far apart in our thinking - everything is the same except that you have one added step to making amends for misdeeds - seeking forgiveness from your god. I'd ditto the sentiment expressed by Steve_Seattle in post #62.

74 posted on 01/03/2003 1:06:13 PM PST by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Diverdogz
I'm agnostic and I have morals. I do what makes me happy. It makes me happy to help others, keep myself physically fit, earn my living and have others like me. If I lie, cheat and steal, I wouldn't like myself and others wouldn't like me, either - it would cause me to be unhappy. How about that, a system of morals - no god or gods necessary.

That's just ducky for you you you you you you you ..... Now try passing that on through generations. That's a lot of what religion is good for. To teach morals to children.

Daddy daddy. What happens whey I die?-
-- Why they bury you six feet under sugar and the maggots eat you. That's the end of it for you!

75 posted on 01/03/2003 1:12:16 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Why should the Scouts change their very basic tenets just to "get along" with athiests? Makes no sense at all.I doubt the Scouts will ever make any such changes and if you wait around to see such changes, you will never see them happen. But go ahead and wait.
76 posted on 01/03/2003 1:16:34 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Yes the SpiralScouts are pagan based. But I get the impression that they would go out of their way to accomodate any religion, including atheism. They don't mention atheism specifically, however, atheists are certainly free to create their own scouts, too. They could have an "evolution theory" patch that changes quarterly with every theory!


Quote from their page:While the orientation of the SpiralScouts program is based in Paganism, the organization is designed to be utilized by other groups, both nonsectarian as well as other minority faith groups.
.
77 posted on 01/03/2003 1:17:40 PM PST by \/\/ayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw
That's a lot of what religion is good for. To teach morals to children.

Ah, so it's just 'for the children'. No bearing on reality or truth, then? It's just a big scam to keep the kids in line?

Daddy daddy. What happens whey I die?-
-- Why they bury you six feet under sugar and the maggots eat you. That's the end of it for you!


A rather graphic description to be given to a child, but the most that I can discern from it is that it might be unsettling. I don't see how that would make it false. Are you saying that we should lie to our children on this matter so that they will feel better? I'd personally prefer to find as delicate a means of expressing the truth as possible.
79 posted on 01/03/2003 1:25:50 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne
"Nonsectarian" and "other faith groups" both imply the existence of faith, and would thus seem to exclude atheists from Spiral Scouts.
80 posted on 01/03/2003 1:27:00 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-413 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson