Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investors' losing streak continues
BBC News ^ | December 31, 2002 | BBC News

Posted on 12/31/2002 9:31:39 AM PST by MadIvan

World stock markets have racked up a third consecutive year of losses, making the current share price slump one of the longest on record.

The decline reflects sluggish economic growth, weak corporate profits, a spate of accounting scandals in the US, and fears over war in Iraq.

With no obvious trigger for a recovery in sight, the slump is now drawing comparisons with previous traumatic share price collapses such as the 1929 crash or the financial meltdown that followed the oil price shock of 1973-74.

On Wall Street, the Dow Jones index of blue-chip US shares - which sets the tone for stock markets world wide - is on track to finish the year about 17% lower, while London's FTSE 100 settled down 24% on Tuesday.

Europe's woes

Over on mainland Europe, investors have had an even more torrid time of it.

On Monday, Germany's benchmark Dax index finished the year a massive 44% lower, making it the worst performing major stock index of 2002.

In France, returns on shares were only slightly better, with the Cac heading for a loss of about 33% compared with the start of the year.

There has been no respite either for investors in Japan, where the Nikkei index settled 19% lower on the year on Monday, posting its weakest year-end close since 1982.

But the full extent of the share price rout is best illustrated by looking at the major markets' performance since they reached their peak valuations at the tail-end of the late 1990s technology boom.

The FTSE 100 is now down 43% from its all-time high of about 6,900, which it reached on New Year's eve 1999.

The Dow, meanwhile, has fallen 28% from its January 2000 peak of 11,700, notching up its first three-year losing streak since 1939-41.

Turning around?

According to stock market historian David Schwartz, the decline is approaching in severity the kind of collapse usually associated with "catastrophic" events such as a serious military setback during wartime.

However, historical analysis suggests that a recovery may be waiting in the wings, he believes.

"We are at the deep end of a normal bear market. But history teaches us that we may be at or near the bottom," Mr Schwartz told BBC News Online.

One factor which may lift stocks next year is the 2004 US Presidential election, which is likely to boost investor sentiment as candidates start pledging better times to come.

"Over the last half century, every time there has been a US Presidential election, UK stocks have risen the year before," Mr Schwartz said.

Emerging hope

And while investors in the major global stock markets are unlikely to have made much money this year, stocks in emerging market economies have decisively bucked the gloomy trend.

In Pakistan, the top 100 shares on the Karachi Stock Exchange have soared by more than 100% since the start of the year, making it the world's best performing stock market by far.

Elsewhere in Asia, double digit annual gains were recorded on the Sri Lankan and Thai leading share indexes, while stocks also rose, albeit more moderately, in Indonesia and India.

And in crisis-torn Argentina, the Merval share index finished the year 62% higher than it began, lifted by signs of an economic recovery and hopes of a new financing deal with the International Monetary Fund.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Japan; News/Current Events; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dead; down; economy; stockmarket; tanked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
In my opinion 2003 will be a slightly better year than 2002. 2002 was bumping along the bottom - 2003 should be a year of cautious improvement.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 12/31/2002 9:31:39 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty; widgysoft; Da_Shrimp; BlueAngel; JeanS; schmelvin; MJY1288; terilyn; Ryle; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 12/31/2002 9:32:16 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I admire you for the economy posting, the subject that won't speak it's name here. No peace no prosperity. Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict should be job #1. It is the war domino. Upon it dependeth the whole maw and the profits.
3 posted on 12/31/2002 9:53:21 AM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict should be job #1.

Piffle. We've had good economic times even while that conflict has raged. The 1980's, for example. If the resolution you describe involves Israel shooting Arafat and Hamas, then I'm all for it out of general principles, not because it will bring prosperity.

What needs to occur is a seismic shift in investor psychology. My greatest hope is that President Bush will do something dramatic like eliminate the Income Tax and replace it with a National Sales Tax. The elimination of the IRS alone will make people love him forever.

Ivan

4 posted on 12/31/2002 9:57:31 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
One factor which may lift stocks next year is the 2004 US Presidential election,

Usually this happens as the government pumps money into the market but we are addding at a 20% rate M-3 money now & it is only proping up a sinking ship. We must have our war in order to obtain cheap oil. W/o it a financial meltdown is assured. If it were otherwise (our safty) we would have the borders closed. And watch out for a terrorist act because the sheeple have caught on to the scam.

5 posted on 12/31/2002 9:58:17 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The elimination of the IRS alone will make people love him forever.

BUMPUS MAXIMUS

And while he's at it, repeal the Constitutional Amendment which allows it.
6 posted on 12/31/2002 10:01:21 AM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Digger
We must have our war in order to obtain cheap oil.

FYI, you're at Free Republic, not Democrat (hopefully 6 feet) Underground.

Ivan

7 posted on 12/31/2002 10:03:31 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
And while he's at it, repeal the Constitutional Amendment which allows it.

I can imagine President Bush addressing the nation with a copy of the Income Tax code - all thousands of pages of it - and then saying, "I am going to do something which will bring substantial improvement to our economy, and eliminate a drain on our resources as an innovative people" - then casting the document into the rubbish bin.

I'd be tempted to soak it in lighter fluid and strike a match too, but that's just me.

Regards, Ivan

8 posted on 12/31/2002 10:05:08 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I'd be tempted to soak it in lighter fluid and strike a match too, but that's just me.

No, dear, it's not just you.
9 posted on 12/31/2002 10:06:16 AM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
The government could also get substantial revenue from a film of the demolition of the IRS buildings across the country. Call it "The IRS' Greatest Hits".

Regards, Ivan

10 posted on 12/31/2002 10:09:43 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Digger; ex-snook
You and ole snookems are glass-half-empty people. Always predicting rain on the day of the picnic. Spying a pony and looking for the pile. Seeing a pretty girl standing next to her mother and turning away because, well, that's what she'll look like when she's old.

You guys must be riot to live with.

Not.

11 posted on 12/31/2002 10:11:41 AM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict should be job #1.

The nomadic tribes of the Middle East have been cutting each others' throats since the dawn of recorded history.
Don't be deluded into thinking that a feud that's existed for millenia is going to be magicly resolved in our lifetime. I'd much prefer to see a peaceful resolution to the conflict myself, but consider it more practical to remain neutral while providing humanitarian assistance to those innocent victims of stone-age barbarism.

Note: this does NOT preclude punitive action taken against those fanatics who direct their insanity against us. However, we should also be taking more deliberate steps to minimize our economic involvement and dependence on the region.

12 posted on 12/31/2002 10:22:47 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
My greatest hope is that President Bush will do something dramatic like eliminate the Income Tax and replace it with a National Sales Tax.

Hate to dash your hopes. He would first have to be in favor of it and propose it.

13 posted on 12/31/2002 10:23:13 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
On Wall Street, the Dow Jones index of blue-chip US shares - which sets the tone for stock markets world wide - is on track to finish the year about 17% lower...

Last year at this time, Repukie economists taking their cue from little Dumbya were predicting 12,500 for the DJIA. Now, they blame Clinton and 9/11 for the Bush Recession and resulting fall of the DJIA.

With Dumbya in charge investment in cash at 1.25% has been a successful strategy. Pity the value of your portfolio if your wishes are granted and your MIA war hero and his Repukie syncophants continue their failed borrow-and-spend policies in 2003.

Happy New Year, Ivan!

14 posted on 12/31/2002 10:32:14 AM PST by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Do these guys know anything else to say besides doom and gloom .. the markets have seen much worse and survived and they will survive again
15 posted on 12/31/2002 10:53:31 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
BTW ....


16 posted on 12/31/2002 10:55:02 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"You and ole snookems are glass-half-empty people. "

Hey Sinks. That's because we are throwing out all the cool aid. I hope your glass is still full but include a New Year resolution to swear off this drink. Three years of down should be evidence of melting.

I'm melting, melting, melting ...........

17 posted on 12/31/2002 11:03:10 AM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Gold futures mark 23% rise for 2002
Indexes up 40%; investment risks spell reward for gold

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7BA129CBFE%2DD5DF%2D458D%2D87D1%2DF4EB1E86BCCB%7D


18 posted on 12/31/2002 11:04:50 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Web Retailers Cheered as Shoppers Flock Online

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Shoppers flocked to the Web this holiday season, boosting online sales from 20 percent to as much as 41 percent, even as traditional retailers showed what is likely to be the smallest gain in more than 30 years.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/814339/posts?page=43#43

19 posted on 12/31/2002 11:08:41 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Wouldn't you have the borders closed if terroism were the problem? What should one make of this following article & what have we done in Afganistan but sign ageements to push thru an oil pipeline? The people of Afgaistan are hardly getting any aid & the rebels are back in the territory. Why not smell the coffee & see that this gov will not protect us
"Powell: US will develop Iraqi oil
CAMERON SIMPSON
THE US said yesterday that it plans to secure Iraqi oilfields if it invades the country and it is looking at the possibility of using oil production to pay for post-war reconstruction.

However, last night it was warned that it would "reap a terrible whirlwind" if it went ahead with this strategy in a second Gulf war.

Colin Powell, the US secretary of state,told NBC's Meet the Press: "The oilfields are the property of the Iraqi people. And if the coalition of forces goes into those oil fields, we would want to protect those fields and make sure they are used to benefit the people of Iraq and are not destroyed or damaged by the failing regime on the way out the door."

Mr Powell said that revenue generated from the oilfields would be used "in accordance with international law and to benefit the people of Iraq".

Administration officials also say they planned to keep the United Nations oil-for-food programme running, at least temporarily, to ensure that post-invasion oil dollars are spent on the country's basic needs.

International oil companies such as Exxon Mobil, BP, and Shell would want to take part in any rehabilitation of the country's oil industry, analysts said."
20 posted on 12/31/2002 11:13:01 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson