Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA Work Force Grows From 13 to 64,000
AP via Yahoo ^ | 12/31/02 | Leslie Miller

Posted on 12/31/2002 5:29:40 AM PST by IoCaster

TSA Work Force Grows From 13 to 64,000

Tue Dec 31, 4:27 AM ET

By LESLIE MILLER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - In little more than a year, the Transportation Security Administration has grown from 13 employees to 64,000, 42 percent more than Congress wanted.

TSA chief James Loy said Monday that 23,000 of those new federal workers are airport baggage screeners hired to monitor checked bags for explosives. Another 33,000 are airport passenger screeners the people who check travelers before they get to the gate.

The remaining 8,000 workers hold various positions, from airport security directors and deputies to administrative assistants.

Congress created the TSA following the Sept. 11 attacks and imposed a 45,000-employee cap, but the agency got around it by giving some employees five-year, "temporary full-time" contracts.

Loy defends the hirings but acknowledges the TSA is strapped for money because, like most other agencies, it's operating at last year's funding level after Congress failed to pass a new annual budget before leaving town for the holidays.

"We are literally holding a meeting on Thursday to figure out (what account) we're going to steal from to pay our employees," Loy said.

Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Ky., chairman of the House Appropriations transportation subcommittee, has harshly criticized the TSA for its hiring practices.

Rogers was traveling Monday and unavailable for comment, said his spokeswoman, Leslie Cupp. However, earlier this fall he said the TSA was "growing too fast into a huge bureaucracy."

"We have reviewed TSA's staffing estimates and concluded that they can do the job with 45,000 full-time federal employees," he said.

House Republicans have proposed giving the TSA $5.2 billion this year, $200 million less than Loy requested. The GOP plan calls for less spending on staffing and more on such things as installation of stronger cockpit doors and airport modifications to accommodate bomb-detection machines.

Though congressmen may criticize the TSA, lawmakers are unlikely to make deep cuts in an agency that many view as crucial.

Loy said he plans to talk to Rogers and other critics and believes he'll be able to convince them that the work force is the right size.

Steve van Beek, senior vice president of Airports Council International-North America, an airport trade group, said the TSA has a huge job and needs lots of people to fulfill it. Without adequate staffing, he said, baggage screening could become bogged down, creating long lines and delaying flights.

"I'm comfortable with the number out there right now," he said.

Andy Davis, spokesman for Sen. Ernest Hollings, D-S.C., outgoing chairman of the Commerce Committee, said the senator and other Democrats don't have a problem with the size of the work force.

"(Hollings') view is that aviation is national security and we've got to find the money for it," Davis said.

The TSA took over airport security from the airlines, which hired private companies to check baggage and screen passengers. Critics said the private companies provided little training, paid low hourly wages and provided few benefits, creating high turnover.

The TSA's starting salaries range between $23,600 and $35,400, and benefits include health care, life insurance, paid vacation and sick leave. The screeners receive 44 hours of classroom training, 60 hours of on-the-job training and a promise of advancement if they do well.

___

On the Net:

Transportation Security Administration


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: tsa
This department underwent some serious bloat in record time.
1 posted on 12/31/2002 5:29:40 AM PST by IoCaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
This is another example of your government at work. Did I really say, At Work! slip of the finger.
2 posted on 12/31/2002 6:13:27 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
>> In little more than a year, the Transportation Security Administration has grown from 13 employees to 64,000, 42 percent more than Congress wanted.


This is truly grotesque......a new federal bureacracy with 64000 employees with guaranteed lifetime employment full benefits, pension etc via your tax dollars...gee I feel a lot safer now....
3 posted on 12/31/2002 6:16:03 AM PST by freeper12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
Ungoliant is in charge.
4 posted on 12/31/2002 6:45:37 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
On Sunday I flew from Wichita Falls, Texas, to Dallas. There were 14 passengers on my flight. I counted 9 TSA employees "working" our flight. As usual, I had to take off my shoes and belt. Then they wanted to examine my watch (chronograph, actually) because of the various hands and dials, I assume. They were very courteous, but this stuff is getting ridiculous. Meanwhile, we can't cover our borders, but we can have a TSA employeee/passenger ratio of 64%?
5 posted on 12/31/2002 7:00:02 AM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
For some time, in airports,these TSA folks have been known as:

Thousands Standing Around.

The Tarheel

6 posted on 12/31/2002 7:00:52 AM PST by Tarheel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
I feel so much more secure now. </sarcasm off
7 posted on 12/31/2002 8:01:40 AM PST by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
This department underwent some serious bloat in record time.

If you think that's bad, just wait for "Homeland Security" to get going.

8 posted on 12/31/2002 8:05:28 AM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
64,000 out of 8,000,000 unemployed is but a small start.
9 posted on 12/31/2002 8:14:47 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
It's not even a start. Just another burden on the taxpayers. The tick is starving the host!
10 posted on 12/31/2002 12:58:08 PM PST by RS_Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson