To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bush could never send Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton to represent him in the deadly and proliferating tension in North KoreaYeah, that's what he needs to do all right -- send them Bubba 'n Jimmah.
But only on the condition that North Korea keeps them.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What do the real Democrat foreign policy experts (e.g., Al Franken, Sean Penn, Bill Maher, et al) think about all this?
3 posted on
12/30/2002 6:29:33 AM PST by
Consort
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I didn't know Mary McGrory was still alive.
After reading this column, I still don't.
FReegards,
Slings and Arrows
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I always mentally picture this hag dressed as a gypsy fortune teller, with ring festooned hands waving in the air and a fixated gaze into a cheap crystal ball. Her opinion is about as useful.
Opinions truly are like rectal sphincters: everyone has one. McGrory's problem is that what comes out of her oral sphincter is indistiguishable from what comes out of the rectal sphincter. And then there is Molly Ivins, queen of the Bush haters.............
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Didn't realize this hag was still around. She has not gotten better with age IMO! Still just as nasty as ever!
7 posted on
12/30/2002 7:15:24 AM PST by
PhiKapMom
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What an ass - doing nothing with N. Korea is despicable, yet that is exactly what they want the President to do with Iraq. The biggest problem is, if you were to put their contradictory comments side-by-side, they wouldn't see the contradiction...
9 posted on
12/30/2002 7:18:57 AM PST by
trebb
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This attitude on the left about how important the North Korean threat is will last until the day Bush turns his focus towards that country. Then, suddenly, McGrory and company will say that North Korea isn't that important; it will be Libya or Iran or something new to Bush should be concentrating on.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bush could never send Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton to represent him in the deadly and proliferating tension in North Korea; he blames them for coddling Pyongyang. It takes an amazing amount of mendacity to spin Clinton and Carter's appeasements of North Korea to be a negative against Bush.
11 posted on
12/30/2002 7:26:01 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: Oldeconomybuyer
And what is Bush, defender of the Free World, scourge of terrorists, doing about all this?As of this moment, nothing. I didn't know Mary McHag was a presidential insider. HOW DOES SHE KNOW THAT NOTHING'S BEING DONE BEHIND THE SCENES?
12 posted on
12/30/2002 7:41:56 AM PST by
Puppage
To: Oldeconomybuyer
But Jimmy Carter facilitated a treaty with North Korea years ago - wasn't that problem solved once and for all? Wasn't it, Mary? Didn't Carter and Clinton solve the Korean problem?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ok, Mary, tell us what YOUR solution is. Mary? Hello? Are you still on the line? bzzzzzzzz
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Jimmy Carter is the U.S. answer to Neville Chamberlain, Bezelbubba is the U.S. answer to Nero. Just what we need to negociate with a bunch of 3rd World despots bent on destroying us.
16 posted on
12/30/2002 7:53:22 AM PST by
wjcsux
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This from a rag that supports senator potty mouth in tennis shoes for her anti American attacks on the decent people of this country. What else could you expect?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bush could never send Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton to represent him in the deadly and proliferating tension in North Korea; he blames them for coddling Pyongyang.
The funniest thing is, she doesnt.
Not only did Jimmy and Billy allow Pyongyang to continue to develop nuclear weapons, they graciously agreed to subsidize it.
18 posted on
12/30/2002 1:27:03 PM PST by
dead
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson