Posted on 12/20/2002 9:23:00 AM PST by Doomonyou
Son of Doomonyou
12/12/02
Ms. Tay
Freshman Honors English
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” That comes from the bill of rights, which is part of the constitution, the document that our country was founded on. Yet somehow, people now consider guns to be a liability issue, to be dangerous, and flat out wrong. So what do people want to do? They want to take away the guns that we are granted with, via the 2nd amendment. They think that if we take away the guns, all of the shootings will stop, crime will decrease, and the world would be a much happier place.
On the contrary, in 1997, after Australia passed the act to destroy 640,381 firearms, citizens were forced top line up, and have their guns confiscated. That should have made Australia a safe and pleasant place to live, right? Wrong again! In 1998 the crime in Australia dramatically increased. Homicides committed with firearms increased 300%. Not only that, armed robberies increased 44%. All these happened after the government decided to take away the firearms. However, that only INCREASED the crime rate. That’s why firearms should never be outlawed.
Firstly, the US is not the only country to suggest having a Gun Control act. In fact, the idea of taking away the right of people to own and bear arms has gone back, to near 1900. Yet gun control violates the 2nd amendment “Right to own and bear arms.” The constitution goes on to say “that the right to …bear arms…shall not be infringed.” So intuiting gun control would be contradicting the document this country was based on.
Secondly, guns are given a bad rap because they have been connected with more than a few hundred murders. However, Steven Milloy, author of the book "Junk Science Judo", notes that "the ranks of firearms owners produce about 1,000 accidental deaths each year" or about 0.0000167 accidental deaths per gun owner. Doctors, on the other hand, "account for 250,000 accidental patient deaths per year" (a figure often quoted in the Journal of the American Medical Association).
By taking away firearms, we are only increasing crime. So what would happen if we were to require that citizens be armed? Most people believe that would send crime rates skyrocketing. In Switzerland, there is a law that requires all male adults to keep a firearm in their household. The crime rates there are unbelievably low! So you do the math.
In closing, here is a list of countries having successful gun-control laws in the 20th Century -- and the results of those laws:
1915-1917 Ottoman Turkey, 1.5 million Armenians murdered
1929-1953 Soviet Union, 20 million people who opposed Joseph Stalin murdered
1933-1945 Nazi-occupied Europe, 13 million Jews, Gypsies, and others who opposed Hitler murdered
1948-1952 China, 20 million anti-communists or communist reformers murdered
1960-1981 Guatemala, 100,000 Maya Indians murdered 1971-1979 Uganda, 300,000 Christians and political rivals of Idi Amin murdered
1975-1979 Cambodia, 1 million educated persons murdered 1968-????
United States of America: To be announced later.
What would become of us if we had a gun control act issued. Would we end up happier? Or would we destroy each other? For we must remember--“Those who do not [cannot] know [remember] history, are doomed [condemned] to repeat it.”—George Santayana
The only help he got from me was my copy of "More Guns, Less Crime", a handful of Pro second amendment links, and a couple from the gun control dogs.
Oh yeah, we go hunting or shooting whenever possible.
The idea of taking away the right of people to own and bear arms has gone back, to near 1900.
Gun control goes back to when guns were first invented (see Japan before Perry and the Battles of Lexington and Concord). Weapon control goes to the very dawn of man (how many slaves of the Romans owned a sword?).
The constitution goes on to say “that the right to …bear arms…shall not be infringed.”
It actually says "the right OF THE PEOPLE" - makes for a much stronger argument.
Add to the list of dates for "modern" times of gun control and genocide: Cuba, Rwanda and Sudan
Noted, I told him I would print this thread and he could read it and all the additional good points made!
That was one of the links I gave him.
Liberals (I.E., Communists/socialists) don't care about the truth. We can keep on attempting to inform them about the truth, but they don't care about the truth. All they want to do is disarm the people.
Thats their only agender.
No matter what we say or do to try and convince them is like beating a dead horse. We must fight them like any other enemy. We must defeat liberalism at all costs or we'll never, ever truly know liberty.
Constitution and Bill of Rights should be capitalized. "Intuiting" is not "instituting." The crime rates there are unbelievably low! So you do the math.
He seemed to have lots of stats, until he got to Switzerland. What happened?
And "so you do the math" is not appropriate in an essay. Try "the truths are self-evident."
SD
Right.
It was a speech, not an essay. "Intuiting" was a typo. (I checked with him.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.