Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrat Plan to regain control of the US Senate in January.
BLUEBAY | 12-17-2002 | VANNROX

Posted on 12/17/2002 11:56:04 AM PST by vannrox

The Democrat Plan to regain control of the US Senate in January.

Written by VannRox

For BLUEBAY

December 17,2002

Well, they are doing it again. That’s right. Pulling the rug out from the Republicans yet again. The victories of the November 2002 elections are but a faded dim memory, and yet the control of the US Senate, once thought and assumed to be in Republican control, may just be a fading dream.

Like the Senate was in 2000, with a balance of power organized by Senator Lott, under the assumption that the Democrats would abide by the agreement, we find ourselves in yet another like situation. To refresh ones memory, it should be remembered that the Senate in 2002 was evenly divided between the Democrats and the Republicans. Lott, the Senate majority leader, felt that a power sharing agreement needed to be composed to "share" power with the Democrats. He believed, that the power composition would stay evenly divided, and that any dead lock would be determined by the VP – A Republican.

What he, and the rest of the Republicans, did not know nor expect was that the Democrats began in earnest to recruit Republican Senators to turn and switch control to the Democrats. They were very active in this regard, and they, as well now know, promised the world to "Jumping’" Jim Jeffords. Who, as I should remind everyone, left the Republican Party and became an independent. Thus giving power to the Democrats.

The Democrats then used that power to effectively stall each and every presidential initiative presented to Congress. They rendered George Bush sterile. To this day, many important bills and judicial confirmations have been stalled due to this action.

The Plan for January.

The Democrats have taken an innocuous comment made by Senator Lott, and are using it like a blunt mallet. Pounding and pounding away. Attacking and attacking like a rabid dog at Lott. Why? It is more than mere "Borking", they are approaching this with a ferocity that has been unequaled. Indeed, not even Carville would be capable of such sustained slander, vitriol and vociferous attacks. They have claimed every crime under the sun, and few not even in existence to unseat Lott.

Why?

If, the Democrats manage to "win" the fight with Senator Lott, and thus manage to have him step down from the Republican Leadership, they will have created a situation where as their control of the Senate is GUARANTEED.

Senator Lott has made it known, that if he were to step down from the Senate Leadership position that he would leave the Senate. This is public knowledge. This would then force the current Governor of Mississippi; a democrat, to replace the Senator. He has also made it public that he would choose a Democrat…and a very liberal one at that.

Thus, this action would crate a situation in which the Senate would be a 50% 50% mix of Republicans and Democrats. – Just like in 2000. Al the projected ties would then have to be broken by the VP.

Stupid Political pundits and Democrat Activists within the media are making the same kind of statements presented to the population prior to the 2000 Senate Jim Jeffords Switch. That it is on Principle that one must (just MUST) get rid of Lott. "Oh my Gosh he’s got to go"…decry the seminar callers who have flooded the Rush Limbaugh Radio Show. They argue, that that is the "right thing to do…". The Democrat Activists are quite busy.

Why?

Because there are a number of RINO’s just ripe for jumping from the Republican party to the Independent or Democrat Party. One, who will remain nameless, but who represents a North Eastern State has been siding with the Democrats for years now and is ready to make just a switch, provided the keys to the Kingdom are provided to him.

Unofficial sources are said to believe that his (the Senators) feelers on this subject were answered in a very understanding way. "…think of me as Santa Claus…" has been the response that is supposed to have been uttered. There is no question that this is in the works.

Provided the Media pressure can be maintained through Christmas, and the Democrat activists can maintain a pro-leave Polling appearance…. Democrat strategists believe that they could possibly regain control of the US Senate in January. To facilitate this, special envoys have been sent to Mississippi to increase pressure there, via a write in campaign, and a media blitz, and promises of riches beyond any Democrat ideal of wealth have been hinted at within the halls and chambers of those "in the know". One such offer of such riches is the possibility is as a VP candidate in 2004.

Yep. The Democrats are doing it again. And, we Republicans are just stupid enough to fall for it.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2002; bush; clinton; control; democrat; dnc; gore; jeffords; lott; power; senate; vannrox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Comments.
1 posted on 12/17/2002 11:56:04 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I believe that various posters here at Free Republic have witten similar scenarios.
2 posted on 12/17/2002 12:00:51 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
JUst one. Good Writing but you need to read a little more.

This whole controversy was started by Carville himself.In fact he quoted Lotts remarks That very night.

Also, tied to this, but not mentioned is the immediate departure of mary matalin from the White House.

Once Carvilles hand in this had been exposed her departure makes alot more sense.

3 posted on 12/17/2002 12:02:09 PM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I'm just about commented out. I'm trying not become emotional about these developments but I'm having really ugly sensations provoked by comments made by Spike Lee, Jesse Jackson, and others...to include my president. I keep waiting for Condi Rice and Colin Powell to step out and proclaim all Republicans racist. Day-o.
4 posted on 12/17/2002 12:05:50 PM PST by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Senator Lott has made it known, that if he were to step down from the Senate Leadership position that he would leave the Senate.

Lott is a self centered, first class SOB who is showing that he is willing to destroy any chance of advancing his party's agenda for at least the next two years. He will treat his own party this way but will crawl sniveling to the Rats for permission to wipe the dog crap from their shoes.

5 posted on 12/17/2002 12:07:14 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
After watching Lott on BET publicly saying he was not a racist while promising to make race a key factor in his and the Governments decisions, he must go.
6 posted on 12/17/2002 12:11:34 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I have said it all along: thanks to the useful idiots who consider themselves to be conservatives who picked up Jesse Jackson's "TRENT LOTT IS A SEGREGATIONIST" mantra, once again, the Stupid Party snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.
7 posted on 12/17/2002 12:12:06 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The democrats??? Better check, whole lot of republicans been getting in some good licks on poor old Lott. Course the dems love all the help they can get because they have more bloodletting planned.
8 posted on 12/17/2002 12:13:06 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Your analysis is incorrect.

1. Lott has said he will not resign from the Senate.

2. Even if he did resign from the Senate, Mississippi must hold an election for a replacement within 90 days. The republican candidate is the overwhelming favorite, as long as he can walk and chew gum at the same time.

3. Assume an interim dem replacement for that 90 days. The senate is still 50-50 and ties are broken with the Vice PResident's vote. We win.

4. So, will Lincoln Chaffee jump ship because of an interim dem replacement for Lott? He would be crazy to do so. We will likely take back the senate in 90 days and he loses his chairmanship because he is no longer with the majority. Plus, the dems will have a very rough time taking the Senate in 2004. Why would he jump ship to a likely minority party in two years?

The reality here is that any way this plays out, the Republicans are likely to keep control of the Senate. Now look at the 'other hand.'

Let's say we give into our fears and keep Lott as SML. Do you think that America would be a better place had Thurmond's Dixiecrats run the country since 1948? Their main platform was segregation now, segregation forever. Real segregation enforced by law.

I for one do not think so. I do not want my party lead by a man who says that he thinks the Dixiecrats being elected would be a peachy idea. Not only is that statement immoral. It is incredibly stupid for him to have done so in front of CSPAN cameras. Had he given this a moment's thought, he would have understood just how stupid that statement would sound.

Either he is a rascist. Or he is very, very stupid. Neither is acceptable in a SML for the Republicans.

Don't blame this on the dems. They can no more resist race-baiting than can a junkie resist a loaded needle. Lott knows that and opened his mouth anyway. Lott has only himself to blame for this fiasco.

9 posted on 12/17/2002 12:15:37 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
It's nobody's fault but Trent's.
10 posted on 12/17/2002 12:15:55 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
This whole controversy was started by Carville himself.In fact he quoted Lotts remarks That very night.

Also, tied to this, but not mentioned is the immediate departure of mary matalin from the White House.

Once Carvilles hand in this had been exposed her departure makes alot more sense.


Hmmmmm.... That sure makes me wonder.
11 posted on 12/17/2002 12:18:00 PM PST by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
Lott has not said that he would not resign from the Senate. I have no idea where you get that source.

We are playing with political fire on this, and I am no fan of Trent Lott.
12 posted on 12/17/2002 12:18:29 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
With due respect to General Benedict Arnold, who for good reason was once the most admired man in America (after personally leading a winter assault on Quebec, after building a battle fleet on the shores of Ticonderoga that won a significant naval victory on Lake Champlain, and after leading the assault that won the American victory at Saratoga) and who later -- after being screwed by Congress and pilloried into court martial by the President of Pennsylvania -- changed sides; Trent Lott handing control of the US Senate to Democrats would make him America's greatest traitor ever.
13 posted on 12/17/2002 12:18:30 PM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
The rapidity of it, and the lack of pomp was a big warning flag.
14 posted on 12/17/2002 12:19:07 PM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Well, I'd almost agree with you if I hadn't heard Mary announce on MTP that she was leaving the WH at the end of the year....the time was right after Karen Hughes announced she was leaving.
15 posted on 12/17/2002 12:19:23 PM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
A recipe for disaster. For the Democrats. Can you imagine the backlash the 'Craps will feel in '04 if they try to pull another obstructionist Dasshole?
16 posted on 12/17/2002 12:19:56 PM PST by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Lott is a self centered,

He will treat his own party this way

They haven't treated him very well of late, because of thier self centeredness(if that's a word) running away from him like he was a tar baby.

17 posted on 12/17/2002 12:20:13 PM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
But look at the dieffering manner in which both left.

Hughes was feted and paraded around, etc. And Mary M. is a much higher profile advisor having been a member of the Punditry. She was shown the door.

18 posted on 12/17/2002 12:21:05 PM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
This whole controversy was started by Carville himself.In fact he quoted Lotts remarks That very night.

Blaming the messenger?

19 posted on 12/17/2002 12:21:58 PM PST by Station 51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
You're exactly right. If only people would open their eyes to the truth!

Thanks for posting this!

20 posted on 12/17/2002 12:23:01 PM PST by neutrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson