Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth
Suday Herald (UK) ^ | unknown | Sarah-Kate Templeton

Posted on 12/12/2002 8:13:17 AM PST by Sangamon Kid

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth

By Sarah-Kate Templeton

New research to be published next year will provide powerful evidence that oral sex can cause mouth cancer.

Doctors who first suggested a form of mouth cancer could be linked to the same sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer have found more data to back their controversial theory. Two years ago, the group from Johns Hopkins University in the US published a paper suggesting the human papilloma virus (HPV), the cause of most cervical cancer, can also cause mouth cancer.

A new study, to be published in six months' time, will confirm this research, according to Dr Maura Gillison, an oncologist and member of the Johns Hopkins group. The news comes as Scottish mouth cancer experts are calling for research to be done here into the suspected link with oral sex.

David Soutar, president of the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists, said: 'We were involved in a pilot study which suggested that this is certainly something that we should look into.

'It should be investigated further, particularly in people who don't have any of the risk factors such as smoking and drinking.

'One of the things that has interested me over the past 15 years is the increase in the number of women with oral cancer. It used to be five men to one woman but it is now about two men to one woman. What we do not know is whether this is all down to smoking.

'When I see the increase in women with oral cancer I think oral sex has to be one of the causes. We also have to find out why the age group suffering from oral cancer is becoming younger. Ideally, we would want to look at the under-45s.'

Mr Soutar, a consultant plastic surgeon at Canniesburn Hospital and the Nuffield Hospital, both in Glasgow, says it is difficult to find people willing to discuss their sexual behaviour, but says we have to consider the possibility sexually transmitted viruses are one of the causes.

Finding out whether HPV is a cause of mouth cancer is all the more pressing now that new treatments are being developed to fight cervical cancer. A vaccine to stop cervical cancer could become available within five years and doctors believe a similar vaccine could protect against some oral cancers.

The vaccine works by boosting the immune system against strains of HPV. The vaccine against cervical cancer will be targeted at girls of about 12 or 13, before they become sexually active and vulnerable to HPV.

But Soutar warns that, unlike cervical cancer where most forms of the disease are caused by HPV, the sexually transmitted virus could only be responsible for less than 20% of mouth cancer cases. He said targeting a vaccine would therefore be more difficult.

'If we could identify the sub-group this would be of benefit. We know smoking and drinking is probably the cause in 80% of cases so we couldn't use it in the same way as the vaccine against cervical cancer. This would only be a small proportion of those who have oral cancer.'

In the past decade in Scotland there has been an almost 50% increase in oral cancer among under-45s, and in the last 40 years a fourfold increase in younger patients suffering from it. Oral cancer affects 3000 people in the UK each year and the problem is worse north of the border.

www.omfsaboutface.co.uk/ aware.htm
www.cancerresearchuk.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: cancer; catholiclist; fellatio; homosexuality; morals; mouthcancer; multiplesexpartners; oralsex; semen; sex; sodomy; values; wellthissucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-349 next last
To: Terriergal
The incidence of oral cancer in this case is only .005%. If there has been a 50% increase, that means that the original incidence was .003%. Yeah, this is an insideous problem, huh? It's also worth mentioning that smoking, chewing, and drinking are also correlated with oral cancer. No mention of these factors in the article. Sloopy science, but if you want to use it to further the puritan crusade, by all means do so, you'll only look silly.
61 posted on 12/12/2002 9:21:43 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Yep, need to get me one of those . . . :-)
62 posted on 12/12/2002 9:22:29 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Oral sex is sinful because it is a tendentious privilege, not a right.

What are you babbling about?

63 posted on 12/12/2002 9:23:07 AM PST by Pahuanui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: general_re; Junior
I'm telling you, expensive jewelry under the Christmas tree goes a long way ;)

So does a new car, or a bigger house.

I'm sure Junior will come up with something.

64 posted on 12/12/2002 9:25:00 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
I knew it! Anything that's so much fun can't be good. That's life.
65 posted on 12/12/2002 9:27:16 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"I mean, when you only bath once a fortnight... eeeewwwwww..."

Could be worse, you could do it with a redundant "dead corpse". :>

66 posted on 12/12/2002 9:27:22 AM PST by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
I was getting concerned. 9 responses on an oral sex thread and no reference to Bill Clinton? Are we slipping here at FR?

Thank you for rectifying this troubling oversight!
67 posted on 12/12/2002 9:27:39 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
If anyone has ever seen syphilis of the mouth you would get a picture of the risks involved.

When I was working in addictions I heard someone say to have oral sex to prevent HIV..how foolish that was..any opening in the mucosa  and you were done

68 posted on 12/12/2002 9:28:29 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Looking into my crystal ball, I see "Smokey Back Room" in this thread's future...
69 posted on 12/12/2002 9:28:29 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Pahuanui; lavaroise
Oral sex is sinful because it is a tendentious privilege, not a right.

Wow. Just....wow. Just when you think you've heard the most ridiculous assertion on FR, someone else comes along to one-up it.

70 posted on 12/12/2002 9:28:56 AM PST by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
I went out with a west-river gal once in college who chewed unbeknownst to me. I found out the hard way.
71 posted on 12/12/2002 9:30:56 AM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Lights out, missionary position only, through a hole cut in the sheet - Those are my rules. Immortality, here I come (so to speak).

The problem is it is always the woman that ends up "paying" ..so I guess the pleasure of men is more important than the lives of women..we will remember that for future reference..

72 posted on 12/12/2002 9:31:25 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
We all have to die sometime.

That's what I was thinking too. Might as well die happy.

73 posted on 12/12/2002 9:32:48 AM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
I think your crystal ball is right on the money ;)
74 posted on 12/12/2002 9:33:17 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The problem is it is always the woman that ends up "paying" ..so I guess the pleasure of men is more important than the lives of women..we will remember that for future reference..

What?

75 posted on 12/12/2002 9:34:18 AM PST by Pahuanui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Not sure what you mean by 'tendentious privilege' - I agree it is sinful between unmarried persons... not so sure about married persons though.
76 posted on 12/12/2002 9:35:34 AM PST by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
I mean, I *think* I know what you mean by tendentious privilege...but not clear on it.
77 posted on 12/12/2002 9:37:29 AM PST by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Right, and heteros aren't affected at all?

What is with these guys who, when confronted with the phrase, "oral sex" automatically think "lesbians"? I don't know whether to feel sorry for them or a just little squicked out (shudder).

78 posted on 12/12/2002 9:37:39 AM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid; Phantom Lord
According to reports so does eating crunchy french fries and toasted breads. Will any of you stop eating those???
79 posted on 12/12/2002 9:39:03 AM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HELLRAISER II
Bad news for Monica Lewinsky.
80 posted on 12/12/2002 9:39:36 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson