Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: canuck_conservative
I wonder if Microsoft will honor the GNU license and provide its source code free-of-charge...

When hell freezes over...

3 posted on 12/11/2002 4:10:20 AM PST by Pyrion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pyrion
Yeah, if you want to see the "source code", see post #2 here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/797424/posts

What a laugh!
8 posted on 12/11/2002 4:20:05 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pyrion
Count on it, Gates and atty's have figured out a way around this if they are going to start offering Linux. My guess is: it will be a Winux that allows both Linux and Windows applications to run simultaneously on a Palladium box. The Linux piece will be open source but the interface will heavily involve the Fritz module and that's hardware.
9 posted on 12/11/2002 4:25:42 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pyrion
Uhm, release of source code for an application is not necessary under the GNU. The LINUX OS is free under GNU, but applications that run under LINUX need not provide source code as I've understood the conversation.

Codeweavers does not release the source code for their enhanced WINE development products (Crossover Office, developed for $$) though they do release WINE itself (developed under a separate GNU) , and NetTraverse does not release the source code Win4Lin ($$), and NVidia doesn't even release the source code for their X video drivers (to protect trade secrets).

Penguin People - please correct me if I'm wrong.

21 posted on 12/11/2002 5:31:18 AM PST by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pyrion
I wonder if Microsoft will honor the GNU license and provide its source code free-of-charge...

Java anyone?

26 posted on 12/11/2002 6:25:12 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pyrion
The GNU license only applies to software licensed under it. Microsoft is free to sell proprietary software that runs on Linux. Many vendors already do.

The GPL would only affect them if they tried to release their own Linux kernel, incorporated some GPL code into their software, or linked to a GPLd library (most libraries are LGPLd to allow linking by proprietary software).

35 posted on 12/11/2002 8:37:49 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pyrion
I wonder if Microsoft will honor the GNU license and provide its source code free-of-charge...

Don't spread fud. There is nothing about Linux that requires userland applications to be GPL. Microsoft already has provided free (as in beer) Linux software. They provided binaries for their first streaming sound player. I was never able to get it to work, but the binaries existed.

44 posted on 12/11/2002 4:43:29 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson