Very well said!
Posted on 12/06/2002 7:02:30 AM PST by RooRoobird14
Yes, though I would hope the first off-script question would be extremely easy. Something Hillary should have no trouble answering, but which rises just above the level of smalltalk.
If the question were too hard, Hillary could easily recover by saying "she'd have to think about it" or somesuch response. On the other hand, if she's asked something which came straight out of one of her talking points (but didn't happen to be anywhere in the "scheduled" interview) she couldn't very well dodge the question and yet would have to go "off-script".
She also stalls answering by laughing in a nerve chilling manical manner.
But she already served two terms as President!
The Sore Loser never had an interview by O’Reilly while GW had a couple. This is dangerous for a politician because Bill O can end a career if the politician is not quick on his feet. Since the lamestream press has always been a mouthpiece for the DNC, Rat politicians have become lazy and are weak debaters. Add to that the no spin Fox format does not allow them to name call w/o policy discussion.
Demonizing Fox is the oldest Rat trick in the clinton play book! How many Newts have they vilified in the past 20 years? Everyone from Justice Clarence Thomas to GW, the Dems have to tell the world don’t listen to this guy because they are racist, sexist, homophobes and now they do it to a network. The bonus in this one is that now Hillary can say she would never go on a BIAS network like Fox.....how convenient!
Everybody knows that Mz Lesbian Doormat is not very good in the debate format and she must have every scene choreographed. When she visited Portland during the Hillary Socialized Health care bus tour I couldn’t get within 3 blocks of her speech in the commons. You had to have a DNC pass and the closer you got to the stage the higher you were in the DNC inner circle. She would not last 5 minutes with O’Reilly or Tony Snow. Even if she could she is not the risk taker that would allow herself to end her ascension there.
Mz 60’s needs interviewers like Chrissy Mathews and Puffballs where she controls what is asked and a crowd that will cheer her empty answers. Crowds with such depth that when she says that Republicans are racists the crowd cheers like they were in the Politburo hearing Stalin. Of course Chrissy would never ask a question about her questionable past as if he were an journalist or something.
This allows Mrs Hillary Ratdam clinton to pick her interviewers in the wide range of PravdABCBS from Matthews to Staphinfection. These guys will secretly let her in on the questions and in some questions test poll the answers for her. So the attacks on equating Fox news to Rush Limbaugh serves the Rats in 2-3 very convenient avenues. It makes the statement that you should not listen to Fox because they have an agenda like Rush. As if PravdABC does not, and it gives the Rats running for office an excuse not to come on the shows. Conversely they are pretending that the samestream media is fair and balanced so they can go on those mouthpieces for the DNC Rather.
The truth is that Fox is as balanced a news network as there has ever been. Yes, we can tell the leanings of the different interviewers just as you can on any network. It is just that dan rather than having everyone a DNC operative and debates with 6 Rats and one conservative they even things out. The mainstream has just ignored the fact that 50% of this country is from middle of the road to right conservative. Since it is not PC to be conservative they have slanted everything to the left. In the past 20 years however they have become shrill cod pieces for the DNC and cared less and less about us on the right. Fox changed all that, from having white eye candy delivering the news to well thought Conservative spokesmen debating liberals. Of course HilaRat hates this format, it is one she cannot survive w/o dropping a few F-bombs and throwing a chair or something.
Fox-Rox
Very well said!
Would they expect her to leave a tip? New Yorkers didn't mind that she stiffed the waitress there.
You never went to law school did you?
Chriss gave her the general areas about which he would ask questions and the tenor those questions might take.
That means Chris did not giver her the actual questions. Let me explain it with an example.
If Chris were interviewing Hillary, He might tell her beforehand that he is going to ask a question about her age or questions on that subject.
On the show Chris ask Hillary. "How old are you?"
They can both say, Chris never gave her the question before the show. It is not a lie. But Hillary were not prepared for this question she is pretty dumb.
Not even if it were a 'cactus thong'? You see, the first to use the word 'thong' on the thread was a person going by "cactusSharp" and it just gave me an idea ;^)
I considered posting a response to this thread until I read yours. Excellent post. You nailed them. It is refreshing to see people with precisely the same views (and dare I say, insight?) as I.
ROTFLOL, I'm sure that's exactly what happened!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.