Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Fox and Friends" reports today that latest Hillary asked for "Hardball" questions ahead of time
"Fox and Friends" 12/6/2002 ^ | 12/6/2002 | n/a

Posted on 12/06/2002 7:02:30 AM PST by RooRoobird14

Sorry if this is a duplicate post--I did do a search before I posted this and couldn't find anything.

On Fox and Friends this morning they reported that Hillary's last appearance on "Hardball" was a sham. Her lackeys had demanded all questions in writing ahead of time before the interview. At first, the show refused to do this but caved in the day of the show and gave her the questions ahead of time. To repeat: Hillary got the interview questions ahead of time!!!!

And this wretched FemiNazi HAG--supposedly the "smartest woman in the world"---is too insecure to actually have a real interview, but thinks she's entitled to be leader of the free world?

All I can say is this just confirms what we've always known about the Clintons: there's nothing genuine about them, and every word and action is carefully schemed and plotted ahead of time.


TOPICS: Announcements; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; fraud; hardball; hillary; matthews; mediabias; pullthestring; sham; smartestwoman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: ICE-FLYER
I wish to God that some interviewer would have a spine and actually provide Hillary questions then ask DIFFERENT ones just to show the contempt for her that she shows for all of the country and prove to the audiance that she could not muster up enough intellectual strength to punch her way out of a wet paper bag!

Yes, though I would hope the first off-script question would be extremely easy. Something Hillary should have no trouble answering, but which rises just above the level of smalltalk.

If the question were too hard, Hillary could easily recover by saying "she'd have to think about it" or somesuch response. On the other hand, if she's asked something which came straight out of one of her talking points (but didn't happen to be anywhere in the "scheduled" interview) she couldn't very well dodge the question and yet would have to go "off-script".

61 posted on 12/06/2002 6:48:18 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Bubba said he bought the thongs for Chelsea.
62 posted on 12/06/2002 6:55:29 PM PST by angry elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Do you believe matthews?
I don't.
I do believe that he gave hillary the questions.
63 posted on 12/06/2002 6:55:51 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Ref your post # 9.
I agree word-for-word.
64 posted on 12/06/2002 6:57:55 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
This is why, if Hillary runs for President, she will not win in Iowa. Say what you want about the Iowa caucuses, but Iowans demand that their candidates slop around in pig pens, go to the Podunk cafe, and so on.

Hillary CANNOT appear in an unscripted environment like that. She does not need Iowa to win, but it is useful to look good there.
65 posted on 12/06/2002 7:03:17 PM PST by Pappy Smear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
Mrs. Clinton also never answers questions.

She also stalls answering by laughing in a nerve chilling manical manner.

66 posted on 12/06/2002 7:12:05 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gary Boldwater
Hillary will become president in 2004 or 2008.

But she already served two terms as President!

67 posted on 12/06/2002 8:10:34 PM PST by AStack75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
The latest orchestrated attack on Fox and Rush must have it’s origination in Hillarat’s Presidential Committee. It could be just as easily coming out of Gore’s but he seemed to be mouthing the words out of convenience. The main objective for Queen Rat would be that she does so poorly in non-scripted interviews that she would be exposed for the fraud that she is on a Fox interview.

The Sore Loser never had an interview by O’Reilly while GW had a couple. This is dangerous for a politician because Bill O can end a career if the politician is not quick on his feet. Since the lamestream press has always been a mouthpiece for the DNC, Rat politicians have become lazy and are weak debaters. Add to that the no spin Fox format does not allow them to name call w/o policy discussion.

Demonizing Fox is the oldest Rat trick in the clinton play book! How many Newts have they vilified in the past 20 years? Everyone from Justice Clarence Thomas to GW, the Dems have to tell the world don’t listen to this guy because they are racist, sexist, homophobes and now they do it to a network. The bonus in this one is that now Hillary can say she would never go on a BIAS network like Fox.....how convenient!

Everybody knows that Mz Lesbian Doormat is not very good in the debate format and she must have every scene choreographed. When she visited Portland during the Hillary Socialized Health care bus tour I couldn’t get within 3 blocks of her speech in the commons. You had to have a DNC pass and the closer you got to the stage the higher you were in the DNC inner circle. She would not last 5 minutes with O’Reilly or Tony Snow. Even if she could she is not the risk taker that would allow herself to end her ascension there.

Mz 60’s needs interviewers like Chrissy Mathews and Puffballs where she controls what is asked and a crowd that will cheer her empty answers. Crowds with such depth that when she says that Republicans are racists the crowd cheers like they were in the Politburo hearing Stalin. Of course Chrissy would never ask a question about her questionable past as if he were an journalist or something.

This allows Mrs Hillary Ratdam clinton to pick her interviewers in the wide range of PravdABCBS from Matthews to Staphinfection. These guys will secretly let her in on the questions and in some questions test poll the answers for her. So the attacks on equating Fox news to Rush Limbaugh serves the Rats in 2-3 very convenient avenues. It makes the statement that you should not listen to Fox because they have an agenda like Rush. As if PravdABC does not, and it gives the Rats running for office an excuse not to come on the shows. Conversely they are pretending that the samestream media is fair and balanced so they can go on those mouthpieces for the DNC Rather.

The truth is that Fox is as balanced a news network as there has ever been. Yes, we can tell the leanings of the different interviewers just as you can on any network. It is just that dan rather than having everyone a DNC operative and debates with 6 Rats and one conservative they even things out. The mainstream has just ignored the fact that 50% of this country is from middle of the road to right conservative. Since it is not PC to be conservative they have slanted everything to the left. In the past 20 years however they have become shrill cod pieces for the DNC and cared less and less about us on the right. Fox changed all that, from having white eye candy delivering the news to well thought Conservative spokesmen debating liberals. Of course HilaRat hates this format, it is one she cannot survive w/o dropping a few F-bombs and throwing a chair or something.

Fox-Rox

68 posted on 12/07/2002 9:15:51 AM PST by bray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Very well said!

69 posted on 12/07/2002 10:15:30 AM PST by ru4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest
To #12 Budwiesest;

Please...never put Hillary and " thong " in the same paragraph!!!
70 posted on 12/07/2002 12:07:41 PM PST by wunderkind54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pappy Smear
go to the Podunk cafe

Would they expect her to leave a tip? New Yorkers didn't mind that she stiffed the waitress there.

71 posted on 12/07/2002 12:25:21 PM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
And they GAVE them to her?? What kind of journalism is that!
72 posted on 12/07/2002 12:26:53 PM PST by lawgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
Upon further reflection, I no longer believe Chris Matthews or anyone on Hardball gave Hillary the list of questions he would ask her. I actually believe Hillary and her staff submitted the list of questions Chris had to ask.
73 posted on 12/07/2002 12:31:43 PM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Matthews claims that Hillary was demanding the questions right up until air-time and that he DIDN'T give her the questions.

You never went to law school did you?

Chriss gave her the general areas about which he would ask questions and the tenor those questions might take.

That means Chris did not giver her the actual questions. Let me explain it with an example.

If Chris were interviewing Hillary, He might tell her beforehand that he is going to ask a question about her age or questions on that subject.

On the show Chris ask Hillary. "How old are you?"

They can both say, Chris never gave her the question before the show. It is not a lie. But Hillary were not prepared for this question she is pretty dumb.

74 posted on 12/07/2002 12:48:11 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wunderkind54
Hillary and " thong " in the same paragraph!!!

Not even if it were a 'cactus thong'? You see, the first to use the word 'thong' on the thread was a person going by "cactusSharp" and it just gave me an idea ;^)

75 posted on 12/07/2002 12:58:17 PM PST by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
I thought she did the same to H&C?
76 posted on 12/07/2002 1:02:52 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
 
 
Hellary Klintoon
Give over the questions, Matthews!!
NOW!!
 
 

77 posted on 12/07/2002 9:02:26 PM PST by DeBug=int13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14

78 posted on 12/08/2002 4:29:05 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
Mz 60’s needs interviewers like Chrissy Mathews and Puffballs where she controls what is asked and a crowd that will cheer her empty answers. Crowds with such depth that when she says that Republicans are racists the crowd cheers like they were in the Politburo hearing Stalin.

I considered posting a response to this thread until I read yours. Excellent post. You nailed them. It is refreshing to see people with precisely the same views (and dare I say, insight?) as I.

79 posted on 12/08/2002 4:46:18 AM PST by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
Upon further reflection, I no longer believe Chris Matthews or anyone on Hardball gave Hillary the list of questions he would ask her. I actually believe Hillary and her staff submitted the list of questions Chris had to ask.

ROTFLOL, I'm sure that's exactly what happened!!!!

80 posted on 12/09/2002 1:39:49 PM PST by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson