Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sharpton raps Clinton for election losses
Washington Times ^ | 12/05/02 | Steve Miller

Posted on 12/04/2002 9:57:31 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:59:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Bill Clinton failed to lead the Democratic Party during last month's midterm elections, the Rev. Al Sharpton said yesterday, and the former president is now compounding the party's poor showing by blaming others.

"For him to say that the Democrats failed to bring out a message is wrong," Mr. Sharpton said in an interview with The Washington Times. "He was the messenger, he was the one out there and helped run the campaign, him and [Democratic National Committee Chairman] Terry McAuliffe. So how can he give an objective opinion with his subjective involvement?"


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beigelikeme; clinton; clintonhaters; sharpton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2002 9:57:31 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Brett66
Run Al, Run!!! :)
3 posted on 12/04/2002 10:02:39 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
They love you, Al.
Accept nothing less than the VP slot in '04.
Run, Al, Run!
4 posted on 12/04/2002 10:06:59 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"For him to say that the Democrats failed to bring out a message is wrong," Mr. Sharpton said in an interview with The Washington Times. "He was the messenger, he was the one out there and helped run the campaign, him and [Democratic National Committee Chairman] Terry McAuliffe. So how can he give an objective opinion with his subjective involvement?"

Al must be a dittohead. This is almost exactly what Rush was saying today...

5 posted on 12/04/2002 10:07:14 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
:)
6 posted on 12/04/2002 10:08:17 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Hmmm I wouldn't be surprised if Fat Al starts showing up on Rush. You just never know with the guy... ;-)
7 posted on 12/04/2002 10:08:23 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
No, No!! Run Al Run!! This is getting good. Picture this: Al Sharpton runs for Prez in the Dim-o-rats primaries and gets trampled. The "Rev." doesn't even get offered the VEEP slot on the ticket. Then, the black segment of the party feels betrayed, rejected, shut-out or whatever, by the white element of the party (who has taken them for granted for a gazillion years). Now, you have a real stink on your hands and the blacks stay home on election day. The Dims will never win an election without 90% of the black vote. They can't win now WITH 90% of the black vote. Ah yes, this is getting GOOD!
8 posted on 12/04/2002 10:10:31 PM PST by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
" He added that Mr. Clinton, who was famously described as the "first black president" by author Toni Morrison, was actually "the first beige president. If I run, I will be the first black president."

clinton was the first red president.
9 posted on 12/04/2002 10:11:48 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think Sharpton missed the fact that Bill Clinton did go to bt the last month for many Democrats and they were flattened and Clinton and the party were rejected.
10 posted on 12/04/2002 10:12:09 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
When Al gets defeated in the primaries, he'll come back to the plantation, but the dems can probably kiss these +90% numbers from black voters bye bye. That'll be fun to watch. :)
11 posted on 12/04/2002 10:13:31 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Trouble in harlem ? (gasp)
12 posted on 12/04/2002 10:18:21 PM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If I run, I will be the first black president

No. If Condi runs, she *will* be the first black president.

13 posted on 12/04/2002 10:21:21 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
When sycophant blacks christened Clinton the First Black President, they supposed no actual black would object, and any who did would surely be attacked as Uncle Tom. Well, whatayaknow, the first highly visible black to object is none other tha Al Sharpton, genuine leader o' the peeps.

This could get ugly. Who's the real black?

14 posted on 12/04/2002 10:38:13 PM PST by moodyskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The last Democratic president to win a majority of the white male vote was Lyndon Johnson in 1964. Dumbing down society still hasen't reversed this trend:)

Must mean that people who can still read dislike being lied to and discriminated against, e.g., white males.

15 posted on 12/04/2002 10:38:29 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: ObieTrice
Hell, if Al keeps telling the truth he may have to switch parties.
17 posted on 12/04/2002 10:40:59 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: breakem
Hell, if Al keeps telling the truth he may have to switch parties.

I'll confess that I am rather glad that Sharpton called Clinton on this.

It was a typically blatant maneuver. I can't imagine how the man can manage to live with himself. He's disgusting. He's worse than that.

19 posted on 12/04/2002 10:54:20 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
And the first red-nosed President!
20 posted on 12/04/2002 10:55:49 PM PST by L`enn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson