Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Gets Bill From Planned Parenthood for $77,000!!!
This came in the U.S. Mail | November 27, 2002 | Saundra Duffy

Posted on 11/27/2002 2:04:01 PM PST by Saundra Duffy

How would you like to go to your mail box and receive a legal document that says you owe Planned Parenthood $77,000? As some of you may recall, three of us plaintiffs sued Planned Parenthood with the hope we could force them to tell the truth about the link between abortion and breast cancer. Go to www.AbortionBreastCancer.com for more info about the ABC Link. The press release announcing the lawsuit is below. Legal expertise for our case was provided by Thomas More Law Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. The first round was lost by us and the Judge ordered us three poor women to pay PP legal fees, hence this disgusting "bill" from Planned Parenthood. Good news is that our attorneys are appealing. That's where we are now. Here's the news release about the lawsuit:

Women's Group Lauds Abortion-Breast Cancer Suit Against Planned Parenthood August 17, 2001

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer announced that a lawsuit was filed yesterday in a San Diego court by three California women against Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliate, Planned Parenthood of San Diego and Riverside Counties. The suit accuses Planned Parenthood of having mislead women about the safety of abortion. Research published over nearly a half of a century has linked the procedure with increased breast cancer risk. The incidence of breast cancer among American women has climbed 40% in the last quarter of a century since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. The incidence of all other cancers has declined in the U.S. over the same period.

The plaintiffs, Agnes Bernardo of Chula Vista, Pamela Colip of Loma Linda, and Sandra Duffy-Hawkins of Sacramento, are not demanding monetary damages, but they are demanding Planned Parenthood to provide women with accurate information about the overwhelming evidence that abortion raises breast cancer risk. The plaintiffs are represented by the Thomas More Law Center located in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

A 1996 review and meta-analysis of the studies found that induced abortion raises a woman’s breast cancer risk by 30%. The leading author of that paper written in collaboration with scientists from Penn State College of Medicine, Professor Joel Brind of Baruch College of the City University of New York, has written extensively about an ongoing effort by scientists to cover-up the research. [Brind et al. (1996) J Epidemiol Community Health 50:481-96]

In the only study specifically commissioned by the National Cancer Institute, Dr. Janet Daling and her colleagues at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center reported that “Among women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50% higher than among other women.” [Daling et al. (1994) J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1584-92]

The only statistically significant prospective study (one based on medical records, not interviews and which, therefore, rules out any possibility of recall bias) was conducted in New York and found a 90% increased risk. [Howe et al. (1989) Int J Epidemiol 18:300-4]

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer provides a wealth of information about the research, public policy and women’s legal rights at www.abortionbreastcancer.com.

Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, reported that “Twenty-eight out of 37 studies published since 1957 have associated this elective surgical procedure with breast cancer. We applaud the efforts of the Thomas More Law Center to assist women. Women have a right to make fully informed decisions concerning their own health. If a women are denied crucial information about the risks of a procedure, can it really be said that a choice ever belonged to them? Accurate information about the research has been censored by Planned Parenthood and its supporters since abortion was legalized in the U.S. nearly three decades ago. It was censored by the same people who ardently professed that they cared about women’s health. Planned Parenthood’s greed will cost women their lives and devastate families. This is a travesty of justice.”

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer is an international women’s organization founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: abclink; abortion; breastcancer; plannedparenthood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last
To: ambrose
I think so.

For every billboard and bus stop placard they place on busy highways, Operation Rescue turns off bunches of people who would tend to agree with them.

181 posted on 12/02/2002 2:31:23 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
You don't win friends or influence people by shoving fetuses in their face or by filing frivolous lawsuits.
182 posted on 12/02/2002 2:34:49 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

I was part of a class action suit against toyota. all i got was a lousy 15% discount for service at THEIR shops. In fact I didn't even ask to join up, they just added anyone who had leased a car between x year and y year.
183 posted on 12/02/2002 3:15:36 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I'm proud of your commitment, and If you ultimately lose I would contribute my share (and a little more) to paying off your debt. However, I think that you received terrible legal adivce (not your fault). The suit does seem frivolous to me on a legal basis (even if the underlying issue is not frivolous). I can't imagine under what basis your lawyers argued that you had standing.
184 posted on 12/02/2002 7:09:16 PM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
It ain't over until the fat lady sings. For victory & freedom!!!


185 posted on 12/03/2002 7:36:17 AM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Thomas More Law Center

Many victories and some setbacks

http://www.thomasmore.org/index.cfm?location=5&subsectionid=1&pageid=1

But as Saundra says: It isn't over til the fat lady sings!!
186 posted on 12/03/2002 7:46:57 AM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
Great t-shirt! Take that, NOW!! (SShhhhhhh - the moderators might erase your post due to the photo on the t-shirt.) This is just between us girls. For victory & freedom!!!
187 posted on 12/03/2002 9:51:24 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
The suit does seem frivolous to me on a legal basis (even if the underlying issue is not frivolous)

It was supposed to be all about consumers' right to know but Planned Parenthood somehow got it all turned around to be a debate about abortion. It is not a frivolous notion that women should be fully informed before they submit to a medical procedure. Go to www.AbortionBreastCancer.com to read about the ABC Link. Thanks for your post, FReeper pal. For victory & freedom!!!

188 posted on 12/03/2002 9:53:47 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
Randall Terry has been used and abused and totally screwed by the pro aborts. There's been a "miscarriage" of justice. Thanks for posting this. I hope pro-lifers from far and wide will send money to help Terry and his family get back on their feet. For victory & freedom!!!
189 posted on 12/03/2002 9:55:59 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

bump


190 posted on 10/19/2004 8:23:26 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

I couldn't find it in the thread ... does anybody have the name of the judge ?


191 posted on 10/20/2004 9:11:47 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

http://www.politicalusa.com/columnists/andersen/andersen_036_print.htm


192 posted on 10/20/2004 10:01:04 AM PDT by LibertyGirl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Oh, just the usual, a couple of windmills, a few dragons.


193 posted on 10/20/2004 10:06:15 AM PDT by Old Professer (Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

I can't remember the name of the Judge but I can look it up. Shall I?


194 posted on 10/20/2004 1:52:15 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: LibertyGirl77

Thanks for posting the article. Unfortunately, this has become a politically incorrect subject and so women are treated as ignorant boobs to be kept in the dark because WE CAN'T HANDLE IT! We can't handle INFORMATION.

If I were predisposed to cancer WHICH I AM ACTUALLY I would want ALL the information I could get! I would want to know that some studies have concluded that there's a link between abortion and breast cancer. If I were to choose to have an abortion anyway, at least I could say I had all the facts. It would be an INFORMED choice.

As it is right now, women are kept in the dark, blindly marching through the abortion mill, unknowingly submitting themselves to developing breast cancer later in life. There are a lot of dead women walking around.

Why is this so hard?


195 posted on 10/20/2004 1:56:59 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
"My Mother died of cancer and I have had two bouts with cancer. I honestly want to protect women. I have not had an abortion. The other two plaintiffs had abortions but do not have breast cancer (thank God!)."

Doesn't that sorta go against your premise that abortion causes breast cancer? Not trying to disagree, just curious.

196 posted on 10/20/2004 2:13:18 PM PDT by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson