Skip to comments.
Iraq Says It Fires on U.S., British Planes
Reuters News Service ^
| Nov. 26, 2002
| N/A
Posted on 11/26/2002 11:27:23 AM PST by jgrubbs
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi forces fired on U.S. and British warplanes patrolling "no-fly" zones in northern and southern Iraq Tuesday, an Iraqi military spokesman said.
There was no immediate comment from Washington or London.
The incidents happened as U.N. arms inspectors prepared to begin their first searches in four years Wednesday for illicit nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.
The United States has said that Iraqi fire on its jets over the "no fly" zones may constitute a breach of this month's U.N. resolution 1441, under which Iraq must cooperate with the inspections or face the threat of war. Other members of the Security Council, including Britain, disagree with that view.
Flying from Turkey, a formation of planes flew 16 sorties starting at 10:50 a.m. over northern areas including Zakho and Arbil, the Iraqi spokesman said in a statement.
In the south, starting at 11:40 a.m., aircraft flew over several areas including al-Nasseriyeh and Samawa, he added. In both north and south, Iraqi air defense forces opened fire.
Iraq does not recognize the "no fly" zones set up after the 1991 Gulf War to protect Kurdish populations in the north and Shi'ite Muslims in the south. Incidents of firing on the U.S. and British jets patrolling the zones are frequent.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: breach; iraq; noflightzones; noflyzones; unresolution1441; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
11/26/2002 11:27:23 AM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: jgrubbs
When will we consider this to be a material fu****' breach, damn it!!!!!!??????And you ostrich-types, don't give me this crap about "when are you going to go enlist?" That is not the point, period!
2
posted on
11/26/2002 11:29:26 AM PST
by
mhking
To: mhking
Relax and watch it unfold, at the time and place of our choosing, not Saddam's.
3
posted on
11/26/2002 11:31:19 AM PST
by
Magnum44
To: mhking
I completely agree. American lives are on the line every day over the skies of Iraq because he's shooting at them. WE need to make Iraq live up the the resolution they "agreed" to and get this war going already!
4
posted on
11/26/2002 11:32:23 AM PST
by
Ragirl
To: mhking
I wonder if it will be a material breach when one of our guys gets hit.
5
posted on
11/26/2002 11:33:18 AM PST
by
ladtx
To: mhking
When will we consider this to be a material fu****' breach, damn it!!!!!!??????As soon as our strategery of directing subliminable misinformation at Saddam causes him to misunderestimate us.
6
posted on
11/26/2002 11:33:53 AM PST
by
Poohbah
To: mhking
In my humble opinion, having someone point a $50,000 radar at a plane, then watching the plane deliver a $1 Million missle to destroy the radar is sending the wrong message. Might I suggest that we fire two of our $1 Million dollar missles. The first takes out the $50,000 mobile tracking sytem, the second takes out a $5 Billion oil refinery. That should send a message that even a tyrant should understand.
7
posted on
11/26/2002 11:34:00 AM PST
by
Hodar
To: jgrubbs
Oi, Saddam - try and hide from this!
Regards, Ivan
8
posted on
11/26/2002 11:35:40 AM PST
by
MadIvan
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Hodar
How about if we targeted every $50,000 radar installation with a $25,000 Daisy Cutter?
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: jgrubbs
To: Hodar
The breach will occur when one of our planes is "hit" by Iraqi ground fire. This will be a Gulf of Tonkan type event. I personally can hardly wait, but obviously all of the troops and supplies will have to be in place. Logistics wins wars.
13
posted on
11/26/2002 11:43:28 AM PST
by
appeal2
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Magnum44
I think you're right. It seems Saddam is trying to draw us into fire. This president is a careful planner and I've not seen him yet react in a foolish way that gets his focus out of alignment. When he's ready, Saddam had better be prepared! This man will not pursue this war the way his father did.
15
posted on
11/26/2002 11:50:14 AM PST
by
twigs
To: mhking; Poohbah; rdb3; Miss Marple; Dog
That's an admission. I hope the CO of the 509th is near his phone...
B-2 bomber: $500 million.
KC-10A Extender: $86.3 million.
16 JDAMS: $62,846 each
Knowing the only warning Saddam will have that we have had enough when the JDAMS hit their targets: PRICELESS.
There are some things money can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard.
16
posted on
11/26/2002 11:50:44 AM PST
by
hchutch
To: Hodar
the second takes out a $5 Billion oil refineryI believe a better idea would be to take out one Palace each time,
not an oil asest which we can use in a few months.
17
posted on
11/26/2002 11:57:32 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: ASA Vet
asest = asset
I are an exsellant poofreeder, duh.
18
posted on
11/26/2002 12:01:01 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: ASA Vet
We actually got a resume where the guy wrote, under Addtional Qualifications/Skills, "I am an excellent poofreader."
We decided that we probably didn't need that particular skillset in the office...
20
posted on
11/26/2002 12:06:22 PM PST
by
Poohbah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson