Skip to comments.
John Rawls is dead
Harvard press release ^
Posted on 11/25/2002 9:52:54 PM PST by Garak
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
John Rawls is pretty much the intellectual founder of modern American liberalism
1
posted on
11/25/2002 9:52:54 PM PST
by
Garak
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Garak
"John Rawls believes that every member of a society should enjoy equal liberties. He believes that a society can be just and fair only if all members enjoy equal freedom. At the very least, a just society must ensure that all of its members start out on equal footing. A good society should make sure that the least advantaged members receive the greatest benefits. The highest priority should be to serve the most disadvantaged member. The interests of the most advantaged member of society should be government's lowest priority."
From an article on Bioethics.
3
posted on
11/25/2002 10:00:25 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: Garak
I had to read some of this guy's stuff in my political science classes as an undergrad. Those readings were - by far - my least favorite.
4
posted on
11/25/2002 10:06:04 PM PST
by
July 4th
To: Garak
Hooray!!! One down, only 2 billion + to go!!!!!!!!!
To: SlightOfTongue
If everyone just understood how influential John Rawls is to the left, and what a big frigging fig leaf for communism his philosophy is, y'all would be shocked.
To: Garak
Will his brother Lou be singing at the funeral?
Let me know, baby.
Paul
7
posted on
11/25/2002 10:18:10 PM PST
by
paulklenk
To: Garak
This garbage was required reading when I was in college.
8
posted on
11/25/2002 10:19:20 PM PST
by
ppaul
To: Garak
Man, and I didn't even know he was sick...
To: Garak
Studied under him at Harvard and M.I.T. That stuff was hip at the time. It's taken years to purge that cr** out of my life.
10
posted on
11/25/2002 11:57:06 PM PST
by
CIApilot
To: Garak
In A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempts to use a constructivist technique similar to the one Kant used in the formulation of the categorical imperative for his moral philosophy. This technique, which Rawls hopes will show us the underpinnings of what we can all conceive us as a just state, is the so-called "veil of ignorance." By conceiving of ourselves as potential constructors of a mythical just future society, but being ignorant of our racial, social, and economic position within that society, Rawls strips away all those pieces of information he considers to be irrelevant to questions of justice. Again, the use of many words to say nothing. Today, Harvard students write a thesis titled: "A Neo-Deconstructionist Paradigm of Pseudo-Conformity and Complex Refutation of Metaphysics.
If you say this is rabble--the "enlightened" ones say you "don't get it." Just as you clouded thinkers do not understand how framed dung is wonderful artistic expression.
Rawls was not a thinker--but instead he constructed an elaborate ruse to justify himself and his world view.
This is what a thinking man writes.
11
posted on
11/26/2002 12:15:01 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: Garak
To bad for Johnnie, God is not a liberal.
12
posted on
11/26/2002 1:10:47 AM PST
by
exnavy
To: Garak
Rawls was the chief proponent of "reflexive equilibrium" as a methodology in Ethics. The basic idea was that a balance or middle ground should be sought between moral theory and moral "data" (i.e. our intuitive moral judgements). Having been exposed to this methodology in the college classroom, I humbly submit that it amounts in practice to the worst kind of sophistry, since virtually any moral principle can be invalidated simply by showing an hypothetical example (divorced from any meaningful context) in which a seemingly obvious intuitive moral judgement is formed contrary to it. The practical result of such a methodology is the denial of any moral absolutes, and the conclusion that the best moral philosophers are the cleverest (though not necessarily the wisest). Would that Rawls' philosophy, like himself, suffer a long overdue demise.
To: Garak
"John Rawls, influential political philosopher, dead at 81"
Probably should read: "John Rawls, influential socialist, dead at 81"
"Rawls is considered by many to be the most important political philosopher of the second half of the 20th century and a powerful advocate of the liberal perspective."
Well, he was an important "political philosopher" in the same way that Karl Marx was important. No wonder they admire him so at Harvard. I have to say, this is one of the few times I have seen academia come right out and (almost, but not quite) admit that when they say "liberalism," they mean socialism.
This whole article really reinforces my low opinion of the ivy league.
14
posted on
11/26/2002 3:30:23 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
To: ppaul
"This garbage was required reading when I was in college."
I suppose they probably balanced that by also requiring reading the works of people like F.A. Hayek?
15
posted on
11/26/2002 3:33:46 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
To: Garak
Kind of sickening to read how many honors academia piled on this guy.
16
posted on
11/26/2002 3:36:32 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
To: Garak
Well, now that I have learned about him, I certainly will not miss him.
17
posted on
11/26/2002 3:46:26 AM PST
by
Bahbah
To: Garak
Few if any modern philosophers have had as decisive an impact on how we think about justice. One of the more depressing depressing sentences I've seen published.
18
posted on
11/26/2002 3:55:37 AM PST
by
laredo44
To: Sam Cree
Kind of sickening to read how many honors academia piled on this guy. Two words for you: Ellsworth Toohey.
In the Fountainhead, Toohey gained a power by creating, conferring, and puffing up the importance of a number of awards on undeserving recipients.
19
posted on
11/26/2002 4:01:34 AM PST
by
laredo44
To: Garak
Maybe the good professor just couldn't take the
GOP's recent takeover of the US Senate. This election
was a repudiation of the kind of liberalism that
Rawls spawned in his ivory tower.
20
posted on
11/26/2002 4:05:44 AM PST
by
AdvisorB
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson