Posted on 11/25/2002 4:58:42 PM PST by HighWheeler
I have no problem if babies are killed in the first trimester. The next day however, in the second trimester, magic occurs and they should not be aborted. Or was that the third trimester?
Abortion is even a good solution for people who are having responsible sex.
Babies are not very human anyway. They cant even eat real food.
Mothers should have their babies killed by professionals so it is 100% completely safe for everyone involved.
Children can make too much noise when they are laughing; they should have been aborted when their mothers had the chance.
Fathers and babies dont deserve rights. Mothers also vote, and are therefore entitled to the exclusive authority to kill other humans at will.
Babies should be killed in the privacy of a public clinic.
A baby is unwanted by everyone if the mother feels it is unwanted.
I tell everyone know that I practice compassion for the less fortunate: so I want to help you rid your womb of that annoying pest.
As long as babies are killed humanely before the parts are sucked out, Im OK with it.
My job is more important than some baby interfering with my life.
Abortion is the greatest act of selfishness? So What? SOMETHING has to be the greatest act of selfishness.
Whatever you do, dont let me see the results of the procedure, I might get sick and have awful flashbacks for the rest of my life.
Im outraged that they kill cute dogs and cats at the pound. Dogs and cats are almost like people.
Im not going to let some perfectly anonymous stranger adopt my baby.
The baby we aborted 5 years ago would be in kindergarten this year. Ill bet he would have been the smartest child in class, too. And the most handsome. My brother would have given him a full sized fielders glove for his birthday, and he would have loved it so much he would have worn it to bed for a week. Oh well, he would have spilled his cereal milk this morning at the breakfast table, and who can put up with that huge mess?
(1) Do you have any problem if babies are killed in the first trimester, in the second trimester or was that the third trimester?
(2)Abortion is even a good solution for people who are having responsible sex.
(3)So should mothers should have their babies killed by professionals so it is 100% completely safe for everyone involved?
(4)Fathers and babies dont deserve rights. Mothers also vote, and are therefore entitled to the exclusive authority to kill other humans at will is that what you democrats think?
(5)Babies should be killed in the privacy of a public clinic?
(6)As long as babies are killed humanely before the parts are sucked out you are OK with that Mr Abortion party?
since the rats are the abortion party they would answer yes to all the above.
"Why are the repukes really against abortion? Because most women that choose this option are white middle class. The repug voting base. If only African Americans or hispanics or just the poor chose abortion they wouldn't give a sh*t. They need to breed white unwanted kids. Children that will be ignored by their parents. Children full of hate. Children that will grow into freepers."
My, aren't we spiteful when our womb-suctioning priveleges are suddenly in peril?
Why the heck stop at thirty days? That's just an arbitrary number; a 29 day old infant is really no different from a 31 day old... There's no particular reason to stop at thirty days, or thirty weeks, or thirty years! I'm not truly free, unless I'm free to choose to terminate any bipedal blob of tissue that happens to be inconvenient! Some of them are, after all, interfering with my career, my happiness, my sense of personal fulfillment.
Bastard. You made me cry.
Some years ago while engaged in a political debate about homosexuality in college, I was challenged by a group of liberal left-wing radical feminazi types to defend my views given the then popular notion that homosexuality was genetically caused.
I stated that there seems to be some merit to the claim that homosexuality may indeed be caused by genetic factors. When twins are separated at birth and one is later learned to be homosexual, if one investigates the other twin - there is a high probability that the twin would also be homosexual.
They proceeded to question me as to why I was then against homosexuals. I stated, "I am not against homosexuals, but homosexuality." and this got them going.
I cut them off with this. "When my wife and I decide to have a baby, we intend to take advantage of this knowledge and have the fetus tested for these genetic markers that indicate a propensity toward homosexuality. If found positive - we will have it aborted."
HORROR in their eyes, mouths dropped, and one stated, "That's sad - there are many great people who have contributed to humanity through time. You're going to deny that possibility just because you find out that the fetus is gay?"
I waited....
"It's our CHOICE not to have a homosexual child."
I then lowered my voice - and intoned in my steelly glare - "How does it feel to be Pro-Life? You must not be as liberal as you thought."
I later learned that all had rationalized the event and were convinced that a new law should be enacted to ban people from finding out if a fetus is gay in order to avoid abortions.
Ah, but at least they recognized the slippery slope.
completely out of the womb! If the head is still in it doesn't count.
Yep. Ann now refers to the Democrat party as the Abortion party. She's correct. I've started using that term for the Democrats, too. Most people know who you mean.
If a woman is PLANNING on giving birth, knows the sex, decorated the baby's room, and is a few months pregnant, why should a drunk driver who hits her in her car be prosecuted for the death of the fetus, even though the woman was not injured?
I never said it had anything to do with you. I saw the sarcasm tag
"I once asked, with a perfectly straight face and a completely convincing air of innocence, a pro-choice woman who was studying to be a Jewish rabbi, Is there a Kosher way to abort a baby, like there are Kosher ways to kill beef and chickens? She stared at me with daggers for about 5 full seconds trying to see if I was just jerking her chain. She was convinced I was sincere, and told me simply No.
I hoped it was a very memorable moment for both of us.
Easy there im well aware of what he/she is doing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.