Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems, Taking OFF the Gloves?
The Logical View ^ | 11/24/02 | MARK A SITY

Posted on 11/24/2002 11:09:18 PM PST by logic101.net

TAKING OFF THE GLOVES? MARK A SITY 11/24/02

Sen. Feinstein (aka Sen. Frankenstein) says it is time for Democrats (aka Socialists) to "take off the gloves". It seems she feels that they haven't been tough enough on Republicans. So, does this mean that we will be treated to stronger lies than "Bush is a moron", or "Republicans want to poison the air and water", or "Republicans want to starve children", or "Republicans want to kick old people out of their homes". Oh, and let's not forget the animation of Bush kicking an old lady in a wheel chair off a cliff? The previous statements were with the 'gloves on'? What wonderful bits of "wisdom" we have to look forward to in the near future!

She wants to run a whitewater investigation against the VP for talking with energy companies about our energy policy. Well excuse me, but who else would you talk to, chicken farmers? She justifies this because so much money was spent in the Whitewater investigation that, in her words "nothing ever came of it". Never mind that people went to jail as a result of that investigation. The Clintons just managed to skate out of it.

She wants to demonize tax cuts more, claiming they are "for the rich". Never mind that all taxpayers got a tax cut, small as it was. Never mind that tax cuts work to stimulate the economy every time they are tried. Never mind that she also wanted to attack the Republicans on the economy, even though it has been Democrats that have been preventing stimulation of the economy. Socialists are never called on their inconsistencies.

Actually though, I'm looking forward to this battle. They can't go much farther left without showing their true colors. Nor can they manufacture lies bigger than they have in the past without looking silly.

Bring it on! Rush is right, Liberals do get funny when they are out of power.

MARK A SITY http://www.logic101.net/


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: feinstein; frankenstein; liberals; socailists
x
1 posted on 11/24/2002 11:09:18 PM PST by logic101.net
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
What is it with these people? My supposition is that they are so used to the white trailer trash they've been supporting for the last 10 years that every Republican is working on a personal agenda for MONEY. The Clintons have because they've never owned their own home or ever worked in a legitimate private sector.

W and Cheney grew their fortunes (God Bless 'em - Free Enterprise) in the private sector. W and Cheney are working as paupers based on their current US pay, in comparison on the wekkly dididends on their investments (God Bless 'em). So why do these frigging liberals keep speering people for wanting to be patiotic Americans and who are trying to keep our country free from terrorism. The Dems and the Streisands of the left are determined to destroy this Republic.

Good night. Now I feel better. Cheers.

2 posted on 11/24/2002 11:23:20 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
She wants to run a whitewater investigation against the VP for talking with energy companies about our energy policy.

How creepy is this? Does she just think that the whitewater investigation was started for no other reason than the Republicans wanted it? President Clinton appointed Fiske as the investigator himself! Not the Republicans. He had too because even the liberal media was calling for an investigation because the evidence warranted one (then they spent the next eight years ignoring the scandal.) This is the type of stuff the Democrats should be called to the floor on. The Republicans should demand from Feinstein on what basis she calls for investigation! This is truly an insight into how they viewed the independent council when it was used against Republicans- as a political bludgeon.

3 posted on 11/24/2002 11:27:16 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
"You can't make an omlet without cracking a few eggs!"

Joseph Stalin (responding to criticism of his purges)

4 posted on 11/24/2002 11:51:06 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
By the way; has anyone heard anything from Babs Streisand since the November 5th election? Alec Baldwin? Tim Robbins?
5 posted on 11/24/2002 11:52:46 PM PST by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
Does she just think that the whitewater investigation was started for no other reason than the Republicans wanted it? President Clinton appointed Fiske as the investigator himself! Not the Republicans

I guess Diane forget this little point

Maybe someone should remind her

6 posted on 11/24/2002 11:58:18 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: no dems
There is no phone in the small village in France that Alec lives in.
7 posted on 11/25/2002 12:47:06 AM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
She wants to demonize tax cuts more, claiming they are "for the rich".

Feinstein is another one of these limousine liberals who talks about "the rich" as if they were somebody besides her. If she wants to pay more taxes, nothing stops her from sending a voluntary contribution to the U.S. Treasury. She has at least $50 million; why not start there?

Honest stories of working people, as told by rich Hollywood stars


8 posted on 11/25/2002 1:05:07 AM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: no dems
By the way; has anyone heard anything from Babs Streisand since the November 5th election? Alec Baldwin?

Yes, he's at an undisclosed bunker location in France.

10 posted on 11/25/2002 4:04:10 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Bingo! It's funny how rich liberals always want to help the poor with someone else money. If they feel taxes should be raised, WHAT THE HELL IS STOPPING THEM FROM SENDING THEIR OWN MONEY TO UNCLE SAM?!
11 posted on 11/25/2002 4:05:46 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Isn't it funny how they don't have a problem spending our money because we are those filthy rich!!
12 posted on 11/25/2002 5:56:15 AM PST by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
So, does this mean that we will be treated to stronger lies than "Bush is a moron", or "Republicans want to poison the air and water", or "Republicans want to starve children", or "Republicans want to kick old people out of their homes". Oh, and let's not forget the animation of Bush kicking an old lady in a wheel chair off a cliff? The previous statements were with the 'gloves on'? What wonderful bits of "wisdom" we have to look forward to in the near future!

Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over expecting to get different results the next time.

'Nuff said regarding DiFi

13 posted on 11/25/2002 6:04:35 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
What are they going to do? Rape, pillage and murder? Thought thats what they had been doing all along. These guys need a new plan. The only plan they have is to tax us to death while they grow rich for doing nothing but attack an administration thats trying to fight a war. Commie Democrats are a bigger threat to me than terrorist.
14 posted on 11/25/2002 6:06:56 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
Can't add to these posts. You guys have said it all.

But this deserves a bump.
15 posted on 11/25/2002 12:45:43 PM PST by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
Dems, Taking OFF the Gloves?

Careful. Next they'll be setting down their purses.

16 posted on 11/25/2002 1:17:20 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
This is great news that they are taking off the gloves since they have

brass knuckles

hidden inside them, now out in the open for all to see (thank you little tommy dash-hole)

17 posted on 11/26/2002 4:45:25 AM PST by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
Think about it. 11% voted for the Libertarian candidate, a party that claims to want smaller, less intrusive government. McCallum was providing that, or trying to. Doyle is a big government liberal/socialist. McCallum lost by 3%. Do the math!

MARK A SITY
18 posted on 11/26/2002 7:38:05 AM PST by logic101.net
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Would love to know how DiFi and others hope to conduct a fishing expedition against Cheney when they have ZERO subpoena power since they lost the senate majority.

What idiots.
19 posted on 11/26/2002 7:42:45 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
Actually, the Cheney energy meetings were not held publically. A la the Hillary Health meetings in 92.

That is wrong, no matter who does it. 'Pod

20 posted on 11/26/2002 12:59:38 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson