Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military dismisses 6 gay Arabic linguists amid shortage of translators
AP ^ | 11-14-02

Posted on 11/14/2002 1:12:58 PM PST by mikenola

Edited on 07/14/2004 12:59:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Nine Army linguists, including six trained to speak Arabic, have been dismissed from the military because they are gay.

The soldiers' dismissals come at a time the military is facing a critical shortage of translators and interpreters for the war on terrorism.


(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200211; arabictranslators; homosexuals; translators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2002 1:12:58 PM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mikenola
"Don"t Ask , Don't" Jihad !!!!!
2 posted on 11/14/2002 1:15:10 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
I guess they got tired of all the "girlfriend" and "you go girl" thrown into the translations.
3 posted on 11/14/2002 1:16:03 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Maybe they should have hidden the Pink Head Wraps in a better place.....
4 posted on 11/14/2002 1:17:40 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Is there some reason translations can't be done by civilian support personnel? That would moot the whole issue.
5 posted on 11/14/2002 1:18:03 PM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
They were obviously not cunning linguists.
6 posted on 11/14/2002 1:19:07 PM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
"Nine Army linguists, including six trained to speak Arabic, have been dismissed from the military because they are gay."

Good. Send them to Saudi Arabia to bone up on their skills. The Muslims there will clear up their "problem".
7 posted on 11/14/2002 1:19:46 PM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
... "It's not a gay-rights issue. I'm arguing military proficiency issues -- they're throwing out good, quality people," said Alastair Gamble, a former private first class ...
No, this is a gay rights issue. The army discharges far more adulterers than it does gays. So where are the articles about how discharging adulterers is undermining preparedness?

Part of being fit to serve means adhering to the military's codes of conduct. This is the case no matter how talented you are.
8 posted on 11/14/2002 1:20:27 PM PST by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
I think they can ( civies ) I remember a statement by the FBI asking for such help.....
9 posted on 11/14/2002 1:20:44 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
Or, they shouldn't have shown up for work in burkas.
10 posted on 11/14/2002 1:20:45 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Bad. Bad. Bad boy.
11 posted on 11/14/2002 1:22:02 PM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
I can understand an infantry or armor unit not allowing homosexuals within their ranks. Whether they are gay or sad seems arbitrary. However, I do not understand why it is of any importance if office rats are homosexuals. Is this any more disruptive than male and female office rats being attracted to one another?
12 posted on 11/14/2002 1:23:23 PM PST by Schmedlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
they were caught together after curfew

Talk about a Covert Jihad !
13 posted on 11/14/2002 1:23:34 PM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Why don't they just hire them as private contractors? The DOD could still provide the training and benefit from their services. I see no need for linguists to be soldiers, if they are just used for document translations.
14 posted on 11/14/2002 1:27:46 PM PST by Semper911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
Alas poor Gamble and Hicks
Were discharged for handling di--s
The shame took its toll
But they're still smoking pole
Cause you can't gay dog new tricks
15 posted on 11/14/2002 1:31:55 PM PST by JohnMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
"Part of being fit to serve means adhering to the military's codes of conduct."

Well put.

16 posted on 11/14/2002 1:32:28 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Schmedlap
This gets into the whole discussion of "don't ask - don't tell".

Somehow the behavior of these former analysts became known and was considered to be disruptive to a productive work atmosphere. Sort of like adultery is - and is a non-gay issue.

A separate thread on FR yesterday mentioned a coach who benched his entire first string football team (including his son) in an important game for violating an alcohol policy they had signed before the season. The players were sobered up probably by game time - why would this coach want his rules enforced?

17 posted on 11/14/2002 1:34:11 PM PST by NorthGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NorthGA
"Somehow the behavior of these former analysts became known and was considered to be disruptive to a productive work atmosphere."

I didn't notice it written anywhere that it was considered to be disruptive. I know it is against policy, but sometimes leaders down at the lower levels forgo policy in the interest of mission accomplishment. I am curious why these leaders did not. They may have been right. Again, I'm just curious.
18 posted on 11/14/2002 1:38:22 PM PST by Schmedlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
LOL!
19 posted on 11/14/2002 1:38:32 PM PST by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnMac
Last line should be:
"Cause you can't teach a gay dog new tricks".
Sorry
20 posted on 11/14/2002 1:38:50 PM PST by JohnMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson