Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mixed feelings over San Pedro film event (Tora! Tora! Tora! banned)
The Daily Breeze (San Pedro, CA) ^ | 11/12/2002 | Donna Littlejohn

Posted on 11/12/2002 11:34:01 AM PST by IowaHawk

It was going to be a night to remember. Ushers dressed in World War II military uniforms, vintage cars pulling up to the curb, Pearl Harbor survivors and a recently restored 1940s military searchlight would be on hand Dec. 7 to greet the crowds at a special anniversary showing of “Tora! Tora! Tora!” at San Pedro’s historic Warner Grand Theatre.

The 1970 film — a joint American and Japanese production — is considered one of the most accurate depictions of events leading up to the 1941 Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. Expected to attract hundreds, the showing on the 61st anniversary of the attack was to serve as a fund-raiser for the Fort MacArthur Military Museum in San Pedro.

But now the show is off.

Why? Veterans and museum members say it’s simply a case of political correctness run amok.

While there was a previous theater booking for Dec. 7, according to theater manager Lee Sweet of the city’s Department of Cultural Affairs, which manages the facility, Los Angeles City Councilwoman Janice Hahn concluded that the event would have been insensitive to the Japanese-American community.

“I wanted to be very sensitive to the Japanese-American community,” Hahn said. “Dec. 7 is a tough day, especially for the second and third generations of Japanese-Americans. Why do we want to do something that makes it more difficult?” The showing was planned this year to take the place of the Fort MacArthur Military Museum’s annual Pearl Harbor Day observance.

With World War II veterans passing from the scene or becoming too frail to attend the shrinking ceremony each year, volunteers were looking for a way to reach the wider community with their story.

Volunteer Bob Meza, an NBC engineer, said Warner Grand personnel initially told him no print of the film was available. Through his industry connections, though, Meza was able to get a print from a private collector for the special showing on Dec. 7, Pearl Harbor Day, at the 1930s-era movie theater in downtown San Pedro.

But objections from the city soon followed, Meza said, including liability concerns and then worries that the projection equipment wasn’t adequate.

Those were all resolved by volunteers, who agreed to carry the insurance for the film.

After that, volunteers said, city officials told them two weeks ago that the event couldn’t be held because it might be offensive to members of the Japanese-American community.

Hahn, who was asked to intervene on the museum’s behalf to show the film on Dec. 7, said that after talking with Japanese-American friends, including state Assemblyman George Nakano, D-Torrance, she agreed with the city’s concerns.

Sweet said he didn’t suggest the movie would be insensitive. He said it was because the theater already had something happening that day.

“The city, as far as I’m aware, is not in the business of censorship,” he said. “The date was booked.”

The theater, he said, originally was going to show the film “Boys Town” but now has set aside that night for Mayor James Hahn’s community holiday party. Volunteers contend the date was open according to the theater’s Web site.

“Next year (on Dec. 7) is open and as far as I’m concerned, the first yell gets it,” Sweet said, inviting the group to reapply.

Hahn said she was told by the city that there was a previous booking for Dec. 7 this year. But Sweet also told her he had concerns about “the sensitivity issue,” Hahn said.

Seeking another venue

Museum volunteers, who already had begun printing invitations, are now scrambling to find another venue to show the film.

“The city’s made their decision,” said Joe Janesic, vice president of the volunteer board of directors at the museum. “The association isn’t insensitive to the Japanese-American community. This is simply the best movie on the subject.”

In fact, “Tora! Tora! Tora!” was criticized by some as being sympathetic to the Japanese position when it was released 32 years ago. The movie was co-produced by American and Japanese directors and attempted to tell the story of the bombing of Pearl Harbor in a documentary fashion from both sides.

Volunteers said a Japanese-American newspaper in Los Angeles expressed support for the screening, saying relatives of many of the film’s extras would like an opportunity to see it.

“It’s a G-rated movie,” Janesic said. “They show it in high schools and colleges to teach history.”

Veterans, he said, are up in arms over the city’s refusal.

“I’ve had a lot of calls from VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) people who were looking forward to turning out to see this film,” Janesic said.

‘A political hot potato’

“It’s a political hot potato,” said World War II Navy veteran Joe Stecker of Wilmington. “All we’re asking is for the space to show this, and we’re being refused because it offends someone else.”

Hahn said the movie isn’t the problem, but rather the events planned around it.

“I was told they were going to have 1940s swing dancing and bring in old cars,” Hahn said. “It’s just not really a cause for celebration.”

The evening was never planned as a celebration, Janesic said.

“How could anybody think we would ever dare do that?” Janesic said. “This is not a time to celebrate. It’s a time to remember.”

It should be a time to reflect on those who sacrificed, Stecker said.

“This is a commemoration of the date and the people who died there,” he said. “But I can’t get that through to these politicians.”

Organizers said there were no plans for dancing.

“We’ve made that clear to them 100 times,” Janesic said. “All we’re going to do is show up at 5 p.m., pull out some 1941 restored searchlights, open the box office and have guys in uniform as ushers. We don’t have the people, the money or the time (to do more), quite frankly.”

Hahn said the program would be fine on any other night but Dec. 7, but organizers said doing it on another date misses the point.

Hahn said she’s taken lots of heat for the decision, but still thinks the program would be inappropriate on the anniversary of the attack.

“People here lost their property, they lost their families, right here in San Pedro,” she said of the local Japanese-American community. “My father was a veteran of the war, and I was raised to be very supportive of veterans. I just wanted to be very sensitive to the Japanese-American community.”


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bannedcinema; bannedfilms; censorship; pcidiocy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Just when you thought Political Correctness couldn't get any more inane and Orwellian.
1 posted on 11/12/2002 11:34:01 AM PST by IowaHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
Ridiculous. Sure glad we own the video.
2 posted on 11/12/2002 11:35:41 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
Does this mean we cant see THE RAPE OF NANKING now, either?
3 posted on 11/12/2002 11:37:33 AM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
this is a great, fair and accurate film
4 posted on 11/12/2002 11:38:13 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
Amazingly stupid. You might want to let her know how you feel about all this:

Janice Hahn, COUNCILWOMAN, 15th District City of Los Angeles

E-mail: hahn@council.lacity.org

5 posted on 11/12/2002 11:40:15 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
However, it would be politically correct to show a film about I.V. Lenin or Joe Stalin on May 1st of any year in anally leftist Kalifornia.
6 posted on 11/12/2002 11:40:43 AM PST by JEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
So a film that was made by the US government and the Japanese government is offensive to Japanese-Americans? Where do their loyalties lie that they would be offended by this film?
7 posted on 11/12/2002 11:43:03 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
I do not know what any Japanese would find offensive about TORA3. It was made as a collaborative Japanese-US effort and depicts the IJN accurately as a highly profesional force executing the Hawaii Operation. As a film it is certainly more evocative that recent 'Pearl Harbor' cinema atrocity.
8 posted on 11/12/2002 11:43:36 AM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

However, showing this film might offend the Easily Offended Community.
9 posted on 11/12/2002 11:46:06 AM PST by IowaHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
I heard about this on the radio yesterday afternoon on the John & Ken show on KFI 640 am.

Mayor Hahn actually moved his Christmas party from another location to the movie theater so this event couldn't take place. Friggin' Rat loser.

If it's still there, they should do this event at the Art Theater on 4th Street in Long Beach. It's close to San Pedro, and is a single screen, old theater.

10 posted on 11/12/2002 11:46:38 AM PST by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The opinion of only one JA is mentioned, and that's a second-hand interpretation. Have to talk to him about it since it's much different from what he has said in the past.

The fact is Tora, Tora, Tora is a great movie, and it correctly demonstrates the opposing Japanese-American (our side) and Japanese (their side) military positions and events.

Remember, the folks who later demanded imprisoning the Japanese-Americas (our side) were California politicians (their side, and still are, eh?!).

11 posted on 11/12/2002 11:47:30 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
She shall be duly freeped when I get back to work tonight. Heading to bed for now but a big BUMP for a later liberal butt kicking. Anyone fire this off to Drudge and Oreilly yet? More exposure will only help (I am emailing it to my local radio station as soon as I click post).
12 posted on 11/12/2002 11:48:21 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
“Dec. 7 is a tough day, especially for the second and third generations of Japanese-Americans.

I had to stop reading after this astonishing statement. This guy is on crack.

If Dec. 7 was a date of a nuke dropping, that'd be one thing, but Dec. 7 is when they attacked us.

I get angrier just thinking more about this statement. I better stop right now.

13 posted on 11/12/2002 11:48:37 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
I smell a RAT. I've never heard of any Japanese-American organization objecting to December 7 events. My guess is that Ms. Hahn is a card-carrying leftist military-hater who is covering her tracks with the "sensitivity" issue. Any California Freepers know her?
14 posted on 11/12/2002 11:50:29 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
Why don't they just ban any movies glorifying the Revolutionary War, can't offend those Brits don'cha know?
15 posted on 11/12/2002 11:52:48 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Other movies on the banned list:

Psycho (offensive to the cross dresser community)
Wizard of Oz (stereotypes of Wiccans)
Star Wars (insensitive to the Intergalactic community)
Cujo (negative depictions of Canine-Americans)

16 posted on 11/12/2002 12:01:05 PM PST by IowaHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
I used the e-mail address
17 posted on 11/12/2002 12:01:42 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
this is a great, fair and accurate film

It should be - the Japanese were given license to write & direct their own sequences, as the Americans did their's. Any hypersensetive nutbars taking offense to this event should do the Thorzine Shuffle instead.

The idiot mayor included.

Were I within 50 miles of the theater I'd definitely go.

18 posted on 11/12/2002 12:04:09 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
"Does this mean we cant see THE RAPE OF NANKING now, either?"

No. A movie about the private sex lives of 100,000 Japanese troops has no historical significance. < /sarc >

19 posted on 11/12/2002 12:06:12 PM PST by Jaxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank
Dr. Frank,

What is often overlooked in the history books is that on December 10th, three days after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Japanese Imperal Navy and Marines overran the US Protectorate of Guam. The surviving US Marines defending that tiny island, including my great uncle, and other American citizens were taken back to Japan to serve as slave labor. The Guam natives were pressed into service refortifying the island for the Japanese at the point of a bayonet.

My uncle worked in a Japanese coal mine from 1941 until late August 1945 on little more than rice, stray vermin and water. He later received a field commision in Korea and retired prior to Viet Nam.

The Japanese have little grounds to be offended about a mere movie.

jriemer

20 posted on 11/12/2002 12:06:12 PM PST by jriemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson