Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Pin 2004 Hopes On Folksy Charmer (Edwards)
Independent (UK) ^ | 11-10-2002 | Andrew Buncombe

Posted on 11/09/2002 1:50:58 PM PST by blam

Democrats pin 2004 hopes on folksy charmer

By Andrew Buncombe in Robbins, North Carolina
10 November 2002

Like many in Robbins, Cecil Hackney has a ready solution for a bruised and bewildered Democratic Party looking for someone to lead them to victory – North Carolina's Senator John Edwards.

"I think he could be the next president, given the state of things now," said Mr Hackney. "I think Johnny could hop in there and we'd see. He would be good. He is a good man."

Though not a household figure, Mr Edwards has been a name on the lips of Washington pundits for more than 12 months as people play the political parlour game of select- a-candidate-for-the-Democrats. Youthful, handsome and with a folksy southern charm, the 48-year-old Senator has even been held up as a sleaze-free version of the young Bill Clinton, who emerged with a similar profile to seize the White House in 1992.

Mr Hackney has reason to know John Edwards better than most: the 83-year-old was principal of his high school in Robbins, and remembers him well. "He was a good student and he never bothered me," he recalled. "He was always in the right place at the right time. He was kind of laid-back. He was not arrogant."

In the aftermath of last week's disastrous mid-term elections, which saw the Democrats lose control of the Senate and cede further ground in the House of Representatives, attention has again turned to who will lead the party in the 2004 presidential race and take on the Bush steamroller.

Two of the contenders, Tom Daschle and Dick Gephardt, party leaders in the Senate and House respectively, have been badly damaged by last week's showing. Former candidate Al Gore has yet to decide whether to run, and even if he chose to do so it is not clear that the party would give him a second chance.

Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts may be considered too East Coast, and people generally believe 2004 will be four years too early for Hillary Clinton. In this context people have been focusing on Mr Edwards, who grew up in this quiet, tidy town – just big enough to have traffic lights, but small enough so that one barely has to wait for them to change colour.

The permatanned son of a millworker was elected to the Senate in 1996. Before that he spent two decades as a hugely successful lawyer based in Raleigh, the state capital, becoming a millionaire several times over on the back of a string of compensation cases.

While he rapidly impressed in Washington, Mr Edwards really came to the fore after a series of glowing magazine profiles, including a largely unquestioning paean in Vanity Fair written by the usually acerbic Christopher Hitchens and headlined: "If you designed a perfect politician, the result might be John Edwards".

The Senator's seamless ascent was brutally halted, however, after an appearance on a television talk show last May in which he was shown to be very weak in many policy areas, and on which he could apparently offer no alternatives to the Bush administration policies he was criticising. Though no one doubted his charm or analytical skills, people began to question whether he offered any political substance.

"Not everyone is born with the innate political skills of Bill Clinton," said the political editor of one national news magazine. "It's a pretty steep learning curve. It's [also] hard to know where he stands on issues. That is not unique among politicians, but those who stick around tend to have a deep psychological attachment to the issues."

Mr Edwards's aides say he is still deciding whether to run, but they point out he spent last year doing much of the groundwork required, regularly visiting New Hampshire and Iowa, which will host the first primary elections. And although he could not help secure North Carolina's other Senate seat for the Democrats last week – Elizabeth Dole won easily – they say he has not been badly hurt by the party's poor showing. "He is a new face and someone not considered a Washington insider," claimed spokesman Mike Briggs. "He has experience of life in the real world."

In Robbins, where Mr Edwards' parents still live, people are proud of their Senator's achievements. They will stop and talk on the street about the handsome teenager they "always knew would do well", while others gladly provide the names of his old high-school friends.

"He had that air about him," said Cindy, an employee at the town library, who was four years behind Mr Edwards at school. "When I got married I bought a lot of antiques from his mother. I was kidding to my kids the other day that one day he is going to be the president. That dining table ... I am never going to sell it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; charmer; democrats; edwards; folksy; hopes; pin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2002 1:50:58 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
A trial lawyer with a paper trail, and a Senator.

And, Russert showed him to be an empty suit, afraid to take a position.

He'll be the perfect Democrat candidate.

2 posted on 11/09/2002 1:54:31 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Folksy charmer," my ***. He's a slimey, creepy trial lawyer, and as oily as Bill Clinton.
3 posted on 11/09/2002 1:57:59 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I think Russ Feingold (Rat-WI) is going to emerge as the DemocRatic candidate in 2004. He has a maverick, independent streak in him, voted against the yearly pay raises, and championed the campiagn-finance reform crap.

He's probably the only DemocRat that scares me the most.

4 posted on 11/09/2002 1:59:54 PM PST by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Feingold is a bit liberal. He has an independent streak, but votes straight down the liberal Democrat line when Daschle asks him to.

But, hey, Nancy Pelosi will like him, so he may be just what the Democrats need.

I'm afraid that there's still enough prejudice in America to keep a Jew from being elected to the White House just yet.

5 posted on 11/09/2002 2:05:04 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He'd be another clinton. A handsome, slimy smiler, all style and no substance. The media love him. Let's hope he gets sidelined, because he could be very dangerous.
6 posted on 11/09/2002 2:05:26 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Nah, the DNC is now run by corrupt leftists and the Clintonites. Feingold's not scandalous and sleazy enough to merit a slot on the '04 Rat ticket.

He is attracting traditional lunch-box Democrats, however...you're right he is a little scary though possibly the only Democrat who could give Bush a run for his money if he decides to run and the Rats go through another New Democrat makeover again.

7 posted on 11/09/2002 2:06:15 PM PST by BlkConserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Edwards=Major !
8 posted on 11/09/2002 2:07:36 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long
Sorry.

Edwards=Major Weenie!
9 posted on 11/09/2002 2:08:08 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Feingold is a bit liberal. He has an independent streak, but votes straight down the liberal Democrat line when Daschle asks him to.

Yeah, but he doesn't have none of the other Democrat's nastiness or corruption. He doesn't whine and wail about the "evil" Bush tax cuts or foreign policy. He's a liberal allright, but he's smart enough to pick his battles and stand for issues that resonate with the sheeple (minimum-wage, health-care, job-training).

10 posted on 11/09/2002 2:12:27 PM PST by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
And Algore says, "What am I, a piece of wood?"
11 posted on 11/09/2002 2:12:50 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
They better shoot some Botox around Edward's eyes to slow them down. I've never seen a person blink so much on TV as Edwards. He is a very bad liar. If he blinked that much in court (bet he never goes to court) I wonder how he ever won a case.

Edwards is "Clinton Light" and he just does not have "it".

12 posted on 11/09/2002 2:13:22 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The man is creepy.........he blinks to much.
13 posted on 11/09/2002 2:16:24 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
He's literally the poster child and ultimate role model for all trial lawyers.

His teen-age son was killed in a car accident several years ago. I believe he rolled over his jeep while four-wheeling on the beach outside their multi-million dollar "weekend place". I have always been curious, though I have no way of finding out, if he sued Jeep for his son's own poor judgment.

14 posted on 11/09/2002 2:19:26 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight; BlkConserv
Re: Comments about Russ Feingold: Spot on. Liberal in the JFK mold - he appeals to left-wingers leaning towards the Green party and also Bush Democrats disgusted with the Clinton-controlled DNC.

Look for him to become a major player between now and 2004.

15 posted on 11/09/2002 2:21:14 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
He's probably the only DemocRat that scares me the most.

Long time no see! I can think of several other DemocRats that scare me the most. ;^)

16 posted on 11/09/2002 2:23:51 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
It all depends what Bush does in the next 12 months.

If Bush is riding high in 12 months, than guys like Kerry and Edwards are not even going to try and run, and the Democrats will be looking at only second tier candidates. Someone like Gore for whom 2004 is probably his last chance, and maybe a coule of real liberal idealogues.

If Bush is struggling (basically if the economy is struggling), than Every Democrat out there is going to want to get on the bandwagon. Kerry, Edwards, and maybe even Hillary.

You hear a lot of talk of Hillary in 2008, but that only works for her if the Dems lose in 2004. If someone other than her is elected in 2004, than her presidental hopes are probably completely over, because in 2008 that person would certainly seek re-election.

Basically it is important for Bush to make progress on the economy over the next 12 months, as it will keep his challengers way down
17 posted on 11/09/2002 2:27:09 PM PST by bigmikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Speaking of folksy. I am a resident of the 3rd Congressional Dist in Kansas. Traditionally a GOP hold, Dennis Moore a DEM was re-elected to a third term, primarily due to a monolithic ethnic vote in Wyandotte County which always goes Dem. The night before the election, Rep Moore was pickin' on his flat top guitar. A little blues lick, a little country, etc. This guy is a wolf in sheeps clothing. FOLKSY MY ASS!! He has voted for every major piece of legislation introduced by the Swimmer Aka Ted Kennedy. The GOP nearly pulled off a victory with Adam Taff, a straight talker. Let's me say it again, Rep Moore? Folksy? MY ASS!!!
18 posted on 11/09/2002 2:28:52 PM PST by WyCoKsRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Mr Hackney has reason to know John Edwards better than most: the 83-year-old was principal of his high school in Robbins, and remembers him well. "He was a good student and he never bothered me," he recalled....

Sounds like he was a real dynamo in high school. I'm surprised the teacher even remembered him.

19 posted on 11/09/2002 2:30:18 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Edwards is exploring a Presidential run for one reason only: to keep his name in front of the North Carolina voters for his '04 Senate re-election bid. A couple of 3rd-place primary finishes, and he's out. Back home to NC -- where he'll lose his re-election bid, with Dubya at the top of the ticket, if Dubya is even close to his current popularity.

Besides, Edwards brings nothing to the Dem ticket. The only way Edwards could carry NC against Bush would be in the event of a cataclysmic national Democratic rout, in which case it wouldn't matter whether he was on the Dem ticket or not.

Edwards' 1998 Senate win was a fluke, facilitated by a God-awful campaign by Lauch Faircloth. It is mind-boggling to see how he has leveraged that win into some degree of notoriety. Of course, the farther away from NC Edwards is viewed, the better he looks; hence, the fascination of the UK press. Here in NC, we know better. With Edwards, there's no there there. And that will become apparent long before the Democrats name their candidate.

20 posted on 11/09/2002 2:33:33 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson