Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arkansas - SUPREME COURT SAYS VOTERS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED EXTRA TIME
Associated Press ^ | November 7, 2002

Posted on 11/07/2002 7:29:30 PM PST by HAL9000

The state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Pulaski County residents were not entitled to an extra 90 minutes of voting this week. The move clears the way for election officials to toss out ballots cast after the official close of the polls.

The Pulaski County attorney's office says officials are currently reading the ruling.

A judge in the Arkansas' most populous county extended poll-closing time from seven-30 p.m. to nine p.m. on Tuesday, citing long lines at some precincts and the absence of ballots at others. The justices said today Circuit Judge Collins Kilgore was wrong to do so.

Republicans accused state Democrats of trying to steal the election by extending voting hours in the predominantly Democratic county -- a key U.S. Senate race was on the ballot -- and the state Supreme Court ruled late Tuesday that the extra hours were illegal.

It was unknown how many votes were cast in the extra 90 minutes. Some of the late ballots were challenged Tuesday night, allowing the local Election Commission to identify some of them.

The commission has not counted the disputed votes and wanted direction from the Supreme Court on what to do with them. The justices in the four-three ruling did not give specific directions in their order, instead reiterating that Arkansas' voting hours are 7:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. -- except that people in line at 7:30 p.m. can stay in line.

The court said today quote "The legislative branch of our state government has spoken on this issue and there is no provision in our election code authorizing an extension on voting times by the judiciary. Persons who have presented themselves for voting and who are in line at the polling place to do so when the polls close are permitted to vote.

It also wrote in an unsigned order quote "We hold that Judge Kilgore clearly abused his discretion and exceeded his authority in extending the voting hours to nine p.m. in contravention of state law."

(Copyright 2002 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: arkansas; elections; pulaskicounty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2002 7:29:30 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Does this have any effect on the outcome?
2 posted on 11/07/2002 7:31:23 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Bump. How much did Pryor win by?
3 posted on 11/07/2002 7:33:04 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: HAL9000
We hold that Judge Kilgore clearly abused his discretion and exceeded his authority in extending the voting hours to nine p.m. in contravention of state law."

Of course he did, he's a Democrat. This comes natural to them.

5 posted on 11/07/2002 7:36:00 PM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Does this have any effect on the outcome?

Not in any major contests, e.g. Hutchinson v. Pryor, or Huckabee v. Fisher.

The Democratic Party tried to round up every wino and bum down by the river and get them to the polls, but the statewide margins of victory were too large for the extra 90 minutes in Pulaski County to make a difference.

6 posted on 11/07/2002 7:37:09 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
What can happen now?
7 posted on 11/07/2002 7:37:28 PM PST by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Now - Let's see what happens in New Jersey when the USSC looks at that case.

I don't think enough people are considering New Jersey - as evidence of how the democrats did EVERYTHING (including illegal changes!) to avoid losing.

And THAT cheating backfired: The "soccer moms" of the world cannot tolerate such cheaters.

And the rest of the republicans out there got scared being cheated themselves, in theri state.

And THOSE republicans said "Never again."
8 posted on 11/07/2002 7:39:23 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Since when does against the law apply to democrats?
9 posted on 11/07/2002 7:42:07 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
It's nice to know there is some sanity in the courts somewhere. Although I would have liked the decision to be unanimous.
10 posted on 11/07/2002 7:43:40 PM PST by TXBubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBubba
so they changed the rules ? ...no big deal....Its only fair that the democrats get to win some....
11 posted on 11/07/2002 7:50:02 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
How are they going to know which ballots were cast illegally? Do they time stamp them?
12 posted on 11/07/2002 7:51:45 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altair
How are they going to know which ballots were cast illegally? Do they time stamp them?

The GOP election monitors were instructed to challenge every ballot cast by persons who entered the voting place after 7:30 pm, so those ballots should be marked. I've been trying to contact a poll watcher to get more info, but no luck so far.

13 posted on 11/07/2002 7:56:13 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Persons who have presented themselves for voting and who are in line at the polling place to do so when the polls close are permitted to vote.

That's why the whole "long lines" excuse doesn't make sense. You still get to vote if you got there on time, even if you stand in line for three more hours after the doors close.

14 posted on 11/07/2002 7:59:47 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
It also wrote in an unsigned order quote "We hold that Judge Kilgore clearly abused his discretion and exceeded his authority in extending the voting hours to nine p.m. in contravention of state law."

These guys are paying attention. They know that the petition for a writ of certiorari in the New Jersey "Torricelli Switcheroo" case is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. That court did not grant emergency relief, but neither did it turn down the case.

My hunch is that the Supreme Court absolutely wants to put an end to these judicial shenanigans where judges decide for themselves what election law should be, instead of what it says... except that SCOTUS didn't want to do it again in the heat of an election. We shall see.


15 posted on 11/07/2002 8:01:03 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
When they get caught, and the cops and judges are honest.
16 posted on 11/07/2002 8:04:35 PM PST by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
It's nice to see that in some places in the republic the law is still the law, not to be contravened or ignored by judges on a whim.
17 posted on 11/07/2002 8:06:31 PM PST by mark the shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Thats all well & fine but are they going to toss this judge out on his ear for breaking the law?
18 posted on 11/07/2002 8:12:47 PM PST by SERE_DOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Now - Let's see what happens in New Jersey when the USSC looks at that case.

If I am not mistaken, I believe the USSC said they would not consider the case.

19 posted on 11/07/2002 8:17:34 PM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
This trickery further highlights the urgent need to get as many Constitution-honoring judges in place at the Federal level ASAP.
[Good riddance to Judiciary Committee Chairman, Patty "Leaky" Leahy.]
20 posted on 11/07/2002 8:19:27 PM PST by TheGrimReaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson