[GeneD]

Oooooh! Fewer abortions! SOUND THE ALARM!!!!!

[St. Clair Slim]

Then maybe they will now get rid of the Planned Parenthood clinic not far from where my cousin used to live.

[Paul Atreides]

``The threat to choice is greater today than it has been in decades,'' said Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League.

Boo hoo!

[MHGinTN]

From the article: Anti-abortion groups were encouraged by the victories, but made clear they expect concrete results in the form of legislation restricting abortions and confirmations of anti-abortion federal judges. And that is the essence of what the supporters for serial killing are left to defend ... reductions are characterized as extreme when the wholesale slaughter now occurring is actually the extreme defended as enlightened social policy! Can someone say 'blood of the innocent on their hands'? You bet we can!

[<1/1,000,000th%]

The Republican takeover of the Senate, a result of crucial victories by candidates opposed to abortion, has set off cautious celebration among anti-abortion activists and alarm bells in the opposing camp.

They're moving to France???

[ClancyJ]

Maybe they need to go out and get their abortions today while they can. Or, maybe check on layaway options.

Such a crisis! What is a woman to do in these times of no birth control, no pills?

Such power in denying their future son or daughter its only opportunity at life. How can they possibly give up that power?

[Robert_Paulson2]

"Tipping the balance of the Supreme Court with one more extremist justice would ensure the loss of abortion rights for generations"

<< gasp >>

ain't it a bitch?
put some ice on it....

[pabianice]

We need to use correct terminology. They are PRO abortion, not 'abortion rights.' Let's remember that here on FreeP.

[coramdeo]

I'm a little slow, and it's been a long time since I studied formal logic, so let me see if I got this right.

1. In every Senate race where the pro-aborts spent millions of dollars making abortion an issue, the PEOPLE voted for the right-to-life candidate and rejected the pro-abort candidate.

2. The pro-aborts now fear that this might allow the Senate to confirm "one more extremist justice" who is not a pro-abort.

3. Thus, the majority of the voters in all five of those states are "extremists."

Everyone understand now?

[zarf]

I am a pro-choice Republican, but I'm against partial birth abortions.

What is pathetic is that the Democratic Party's only rallying issue is abortion.

It is the only issue that motivates them to go to the polls.

Taxes? Defense? Social Security? Homeland? Defense? Do the Demonrats have any substantive views on these issues?

Ann Coulter was right....they should change their name to the abortion party.

[americanMel]

``Roe v. Wade hangs by a single vote,'' said Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women. ``Tipping the balance of the Supreme Court with one more extremist justice would ensure the loss of abortion rights for generations." Extremist justice? Who are they calling extremist? PUHLEEEZE. Take a pill and get over it already. We've taken our country back (hopefully).

[nutmeg]

FYI

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Let them shake in their boots I am damned tired of the leftist democrats representing good as bad and bad as good all awhile saying they care for the underdog and poor folks and are 'for the people.'

They are pro death under the guise of women's 'rights' and then scream about death and want to take guns away! Such hypocrites! America has cought on to their lines of lies of utter evil vile and hate!How many partial birth and abortions was an uncounted vote?

[F.J. Mitchell]

Isn't it a twisted conception of reality, when these pro-baby murder ghouls, refer to those who are grieved to the soul over the 100 million babies, that have died because of the perverted supreme court decision called "Roe vs Wade, as extremist?

[Lurking2Long]

They're coming to take me away, ha-ha (the abortionists, that is)!

[Steve_Seattle]

It has been obvious to me that preserving Roe v. Wade has been the central operating principle of the Democratic Party since the mid-1980's. Preserving Roe v. Wade at any cost is what has turned the party into a party of liars and thugs. The anti-Bork campaign, the Clarence Thomas hearings, the rabid defense of Clinton, the party line vote against Charles Pickering - all of the ugliest episodes in the history of the modern Democratic Party can be traced back to Roe v. Wade. The Dems should change their name to the National Abortion Rights Party. Then maybe aging Catholics like my parents (who vote 100% Democrat) would finally get it.

[No Left Turn]

"What will come of this country if we can't kill babies?" fretted Planned Parenthood president, Gloria Feldt.

[Aric2000]

Sorry to tell you all this, but NOTHING is going to happen with abortion, it is one of the 3rd rail of politics.

The only thing that we might get now is a ban on partial birth abortions, but the fact of the matter is, it ain't gonna change until the peoples minds are changed. Hitting them upside the head with laws is not gonna change anybodies minds, and shooting abortion doctors just makes it worse.

Nothing is gonna happen with abortion, either way.

It is in a deadlock and will remain where it is for quite a while yet.

[PennsylvaniaMom]

While the timing of possible Supreme Court vacancies is uncertain, a battle may flare soon in Congress over the late-term procedure referred to by its critics as partial-birth abortion. Congress tried to ban the procedure in the late 1990s, but failed to overturn two vetoes by President Clinton.

Referred to by its critics? That is what the procedure is actually called by those who provide this grisly 'choice.' Infanticide would be what its critics (myself included) would call it. Further impartialitiy from those who edit the AP wire...

[syriacus]

I voted straight RTL. I hope the message was well received.

[Salvation]

From an email:

11/7/02

Dear Karen,

Don't wait for Dan Rather to tell you this...

But one of the key factors in yesterday's elections
was the abortion issue...

And in all the key close races in which abortion was
the issue, the PRO-LIFE candidate won!

Consider this...


--IN NEW HAMPSHIRE, pro-life Sen. John Sununu won
by a strong margin over his
pro-abortion opponent.


--IN COLORADO, pro-life Sen. Wayne Allard won by a
surprising margin over his
pro-abortion opponent.


--IN GEORGIA, pro-life Sen. Saxby Chambliss won by an
overwhelming margin over the
pro-abortion incumbent.


--IN NORTH CAROLINA, pro-life Sen. Elizabeth Dole won.


--IN OREGON, pro-life Sen. Gordon Smith won handily.


--AND IN MISSOURI, pro-life Sen. Jim Talent won by 23,401
votes over the pro-abortion incumbent
in the race that tipped the balance of
power in the Senate!!


Karen, your PRO-LIFE VOTES and your PRO-LIFE VOICE
made THE DIFFERENCE in this election!

Even in Arkansas where a pro-life incumbent was defeated,
incoming Sen. Mark Pryor ran on a family values and faith
platform and supported a ban on abortion in most instances.


THESE PRO-LIFE VICTORIES HAPPENED DESPITE THE FACT THAT
THE PRO-ABORTION LOBBY SPENT MILLIONS TO RALLY THEIR BASE!

And you can bet that if these key elections had gone
the other way, the top story in the news would be the
pro-life defeat.

Now think...
Have you heard ANY analysis like what you just read above?