Big sloppy wet kisses for Annie!! 
Posted on 11/06/2002 3:16:33 PM PST by venizelos
WAS SUPER-PUNDIT Ann Coulter targeted by a journalistic hoax?
On September 1, editor Bob Unger published an open letter telling Miss Coulter she was "fired" – that is, that he was dropping her syndicated column from his paper, the Centre Daily Times (CDT) of State College, Pennsylvania.
Two days later, Unger told Editor & Publisher (E&P) that he was swamped with supportive e-mails. E&P reported Unger’s claim, apparently without checking its accuracy. Bill O’Reilly of Fox News likewise made no attempt to question or challenge anything Unger said in a September 18 interview.
Despite the puppy-dog trust some interviewers have lavished on Unger, mounting evidence suggests that his "firing" of Ann Coulter may have been a carefully-staged hoax.
In previous columns, I questioned Unger’s e-mail figures. For instance, Unger implied that he had received only 15 pro-Coulter e-mails during a two-day period which happened to coincide with a massive pro-Coulter e-mail campaign by the FreeRepublic.com message board, targeting Unger.
What happened to all of those Free Republic e-mails?
Now a CDT reader has informed me that Unger started running Coulter’s column only a few weeks before "firing" her. Unger may have planned Coulter’s "firing" from the beginning, this reader suggests.
Intrigued, I ran a Nexis search. Sure enough, Coulter’s columns ran in CDT for only three months – from May 26 to August 30, 2002.
What could possibly have happened in a mere three months to turn Unger against Miss Coulter?
Of course, Miss Coulter’s book Slander sold over 400,000 copies and topped the New York Times non-fiction hardcover bestseller list for eight weeks straight during that time period. But that hardly seems a firing offense.
In his open letter, Unger implied that he was "shocked, shocked" – as Claude Raines put it in Casablanca – to discover that Miss Coulter thinks liberals are "no good."
Was Unger the only journalist in the country who did not know Miss Coulter’s opinion of liberals?
He also called Miss Coulter a "hater."
"[S]he hates Democrats," he told O’Reilly. "Clearly, she hates liberals. She's made no bones about hating environmentalists. I think she hates most Muslims…"
Of course, Miss Coulter does not "hate" Muslims. However, after losing her friend Barbara Olson in the 9-11 attack, Miss Coulter wrote of America’s enemies, on September 13, 2001: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity!"
Her battle cry resonated with middle America, catapulting Miss Coulter overnight into uber-celebrity. Sara Rimensnyder writes in Reason Magazine:
Until then, Coulter was best known as a TV pundit whose stock in trade was tossing her platinum haystack while firing off the sort of conservative bons mots more typically associated with Rush Limbaugh than with leggy blondes. Since Coulter advocated conversion by the sword, her stock has really blown through the roof.
Is Unger the only journalist in America who missed all of that?
Unger is precisely the sort of whining, mincing, bed-wetting liberal whom Miss Coulter savages in every column she writes. Why did he publish her column in the first place?
The Mark David Chapman Syndrome comes to mind.
Chapman was a misfit who imagined he could share in John Lennon’s celebrity only by shooting the poor man. Can it be that Unger likewise believed that the only way he could bask, even briefly, in Miss Coulter’s limelight was by hurting her?
Unger is now out of a job. He stepped down suddenly on October 21. Unger and his boss – CDT publisher Henry Haitz – have both issued public statements denying any connection between Unger’s departure and L’Affaire Coulter.
Their announcements call to mind Otto von Bismarck’s admonition, "Never believe in anything until it has been officially denied."
Firing people is a touchy business in today’s litigious society. One can’t really blame Mr. Haitz for playing it safe and trying to downplay the controversy.
Unfortunately, Haitz has gone above and beyond the call of duty. In his effort to demonstrate editorial continuity, he is following dangerously in Unger’s footsteps.
"I'm glad Ann Coulter's no longer in the CDT," Haitz stated on October 27. "She's not coming back."
Like Unger before him, Haitz told Editor & Publisher on October 29 that over 90 percent of his e-mails have opposed Coulter. E&P’s Dave Astor failed yet again to treat this claim with the skepticism it deserves. He did, however, at least take the trouble this time to note that E&P’s own e-mail has run 90 percent in Coulter’s favor.
I wonder what sort of e-mail Mr. Haitz is really getting.
Big sloppy wet kisses for Annie!!
That's Unger there in the background at his new job.
"I'm glad Ann Coulter's no longer in the CDT," Haitz stated on October 27. "She's not coming back."
Haitz (ironic name, BTW) keeps missing the point, here. It is not that Ann, who probably does not even know of his fishwrap, is not returning to the CDT... it is HE who is not returning to ride Ann's coattails.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.