NJ DEBATE 2 RE-AIRING TONIGHT--C-SPAN-- 7PM: Lautenberg Incoherence, Prevarication, Continue

c-span | 11-3-02 | Mia T

[Mia T]

NJ DEBATE 2 RE-AIRING TONIGHT--C-SPAN-- 7PM: Lautenberg Incoherence, Prevarication and Nastiness Continues

[governsleastgovernsbest]

How can a self-respecting person, Democrat or not, vote for this obviously senile guy?

[sam_paine]

I give up. I've listened to this for several minutes now!!! I can't watch this anymore!

[Irish Eyes]

This is absolutlty the worst debate I have ever seen. Forrester barely gets a chance to speak, he has been interrupted by both constantly. The moderator just now broke in to say he almost had an announcement but was mistaken. What a farce of a debate.

[snippy_about_it]

Lautenburg sure knows how to talk without saying anything coherent.

[sboyd]

Forrester has so much more class than Launtenburg. Lautenberg stumbles and stutters for the answers. watching these two I can't help but think only a fool would vote for Lautenberg.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Does anyone REALLY expect a fair debate in NJ?

[Intolerant in NJ]

Used to be 'rats would accuse the 'pubs of "raiding Social Security" and wanting to "give tax cuts to the rich"...the Lout has refined this in his current campaign by claiming that "Republicans want to raid social security to give tax cuts to the rich"...I see the day coming soon when all 'rats can run under the same unifying slogan "Republicans want to raid Social Security to give tax cuts to the rich so they can buy illegal assault weapons to shoot kids and little old ladies"...the demagogism of these people is astounding.....

[Republic]

At the end, before the closing statements-the moderator (if you can call him that) asked each candidate to state what he admired most about the other.

Lautenberg went first. He said something along the lines of what I admire about Forrester is that he can say one thing early on and then so easily change his words later. That is way off in terms of actual wording-but it is the gist of it, I think.

The moderator then said "That certainly did not sound like something admirable, something you admire..."

To which Forrester said " Didn't sound like it to me, either.

Then Forrester continued. "I admire that Frank worked hard throughout his life and that he served in our nations' military and although I disagree with his ideas how this nation needs be governed, I certainly would not discount his contributions." [Words to that effect, anyway.]

The camera panned to lautenberg face, and the look of meaness, hatred, anger and undisguised loathing found upon his mug was astounding. Chilling. Kinda scary.

[Mia T]

 

 

NEW JERSEY DEBATE2:

Even More Lautenberg Incoherence, Prevarication and Nastiness

 

 

Mia T, 11-03-02

 

It was a total rout.

The doddering old fool actually outdid his New Jersey Debate1 performance notwithstanding Gabe Pressman running interference after every Forrester Debate2 offensive.

Hard to believe but Lautenberg was even more ubiquitously incoherent, stumbling, bumbling, nasty, prevaricating and totally out of touch with the needs of the post-9/11 world.

All while Forrester performed flawlessly...

I cannot imagine anyone bothering to vote for this retrograde, venomous, senile relic...which means that the clinton-McAuliffe-DNC voter fraud machine will be working overtime in New Jersey... POLL WATCHERS ALERT!

 

 

 

 

clinton-McAuliffe-DNC CORRUPTING ELECTORAL PROCESS/UNDERMINING HOMELAND SECURITY

NEW JERSEY DEBATE: Incoherence and Prevarication Characterize Lautenberg's Performance

YOO-HOO Mrs. clinton:

THE CLINTON RAPES ARE "UNBECOMING"

Torricelli-Lautenberg-DNC Switcheroo Scheme Not 1st Foray into Virtual Reality

après-ski: Frank's a no-show

See Frank run.

_{PLANE FACT}

[Intolerant in NJ]

the moderator (if you can call him that) asked each candidate to state what he admired most about the other...I saw this - Lout couldn't even bring himself to say one kind thing when asked to, vs. Forrester's class in giving a positive statement even after Lout had dissed him - says volumes about which is really the compassionate vs. the venomous party - very sad.....

[jackbill]

Mia, did you hear the C-SPAN caller the other day who claimed that he was a doctor (internal medicine) for over 30 years. He said that, after viewing the first debate, that he was convinced that Lousyberg had early Alzheimers? And he said that the DemocRATs who were putting him in this position were shortening his life.

The doctor claimed that Lousyberg could not serve for more than six months.

[Steven W.]

no, no - according DemoncRAT lore, Republicans want to starve grandmothers and then throw them out to rot in the street, not shoot them, unless they shoot them after they've thrown them out starving onto the street, I guess.