Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AR POLL: US Senate (Tim Hutchinson (R) 43% v Mark Pryor 51% )
katv.com ^ | 11/02/2002 | Arkansas News Bureau/Stephens Media Group

Posted on 11/02/2002 8:04:26 PM PST by KQQL

>

The Spirit of Arkansas      
  Search KATV
  
 news internet

 News

 Weather

 2002 Vote

 Sports

 Around The Home

 ARSN

 7 On Your Side

 Daybreak

 Good Morning Arkansas

 KATV Forums

 Programming

 HealthCheck

 Healthy Baby

 Recipes

 Local Entertainment

 Community Events

 Inside KATV

 Movie Reviews

 JobCenter

 Member Profile

 Classifieds

 Advertise On 7

 Games

 Contact KATV

  Home Page


eforecast.gif

enews.gif

newslink.gif

ath_miniad.gif

 

US Senate

 

Return to index page

If the election for the US Senate were held today, would you vote for...

 
Tim Hutchinson (R) Mark Pryor (D) Undecided
43 % 51 % 6 %
This is the fourth survey conducted by ORA on this race since August. The three previous surveys were conducted for the Arkansas News Bureau/Stephens Media Group:

  August September October 1
Hutchinson (R) 41 % 40 % 43 %
Pryor (D) 51 % 50 % 48 %
Undecided 8 % 10 % 9 %

Hutchinson and Pryor are virtually tied in name recognition. Pryor's favorable rating is higher than Hutchinson's and Pryor also has a lower unfavorable rating than Hutchison:

  Favorable Mixed Unfavorable Don't recognize
or can't rate
Total Name
Recognition
Hutchinson (R) 52 % 4 % 35 % 9 % 91 %
Pryor (D) 60 % 4 % 29 % 7 % 93 %

Pryor leads Hutchinson in the First, Second and Fourth Congressional Districts, while Hutchinson leads Pryor in the Third District:

  First
District
Second
District
Third
District
Fourth
District
Hutchinson (R) 36 % 37 % 58 % 42 %
Pryor (D) 57 % 57 % 36 % 54 %
Undecided 7 % 6 % 6 % 3 %

Hutchinson and Pryor are virtually tied in the support they receive from their respective parties. Hutchinson furthermore leads among Independents:

  Democrats Independents Republicans
Hutchinson (R) 8 % 51 % 85 %
Pryor (D) 86 % 44 % 9 %
Undecided 6 % 6 % 5 %

Pryor leads among voters with a high school education or less while the two are virtually tied among voters with some college education. Hutchinson leads among college graduates:

  Some HS HS Grad Some
College
College
Graduate
Hutchinson (R) 34 % 34 % 48 % 52 %
Pryor (D) 63 % 58 % 47 % 44 %
Undecided 4 % 8 % 6 % 4 %

Pryor leads among voters 35 and older while Hutchinson leads among younger voters:

  18-35 35-44 45-54 55-64  65+
Hutchinson (R) 61 % 38 % 44 % 47 % 37 %
Pryor (D) 34 % 56 % 50 % 52 % 55 %
Undecided 5 % 6 % 7 % 1 % 8 %

Pryor leads among retirees and white collar workers, while Hutchinson leads among white collar voters:

  White
Collar
Blue
Collar
Retired
Hutchinson (R) 51 % 43 % 39 %
Pryor (D) 45 % 53 % 54 %
Undecided 4 % 4 % 7 %

Pryor leads among voters whose yearly incomes fall below $50,000 per year and Hutchinson leads among voters with incomes $75,000 or more. The two are virtually tied among the $50,000-$75,000 per year income group:

  <$20K $20-30K $30-40K $40-50K $50-75K  >$75K
Hutchinson (R) 34 % 41 % 44 % 47 % 48 % 56 %
Pryor (D) 60 % 52 % 50 % 51 % 49 % 39 %
Undecided 6 % 8 % 6 % 2 % 3 % 5 %

Hutchinson and Pryor are virtually tied among whites while Pryor holds a substantial lead among African-Americans:

  White African
American
Hutchinson (R) 47 % 15 %
Pryor (D) 48 % 75 %
Undecided 5 % 9 %

Pryor leads among both men and women:

  Male Female
Hutchinson (R) 44 % 42 %
Pryor (D) 51 % 51 %
Undecided 5 % 7 %

Methodology
Opinion Research Associates, Inc., of Little Rock, interviewed 500 randomly selected registered voters in Arkansas who said they were planning to vote in the November General Election.
Interviews were conducted by telephone during the evenings of October 23-25, and on Saturday October 26, 2002.
Interviews were conducted statewide and divided equally among the state's four congressional districts, with 125 interviews completed in each district.
The margin of error for a random sample of 500 registered voters = ±4.5 percentage points, at the 95% level of confidence. This means that the 95% of all random samples of this size will produce percentages that can be expected to vary, as a result of random variation, by no more than 4.5 percentage points from the true population parameters.
Percentages calculated on smaller subsamples will have a somewhat larger margin of error depending upon the size of the subsample. For example, the margin of error for each of the congressional districts is approximately ±9 percentage points.
Occasionally percentages may not add up to 100% because of rounding error.

Return to index page

main_newsteam.gif

Privacy Policy, Terms of Use

Copyright ©2002 KATV, LLC.   Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.

Problems, Questions, Comments? Contact the Webmaster
KATV adheres to the ICRA RATING SYSTEM for parental control



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last
To: HoundsTooth_BP
You can't imagine how strongly I am pulling for you to be right on this.
61 posted on 11/02/2002 8:50:46 PM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Is anybody suppose to take seriously a poll put out by a TV station?

The TV station didn't conduct the poll. They're just the ones who hired the pollster.

62 posted on 11/02/2002 8:52:04 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
Standing up for marital fidelity is getting harder, because so many men have dumped their wives and want to shout down anyone who disagrees with such behavior. It's kind of like trying to be pro-life - so many women have had abortions that they have an emotional commitment to the abort cause - and will shout down pro-lifers. As more men leave wives and families - and more women get abortions - it's harder and harder to make a case for olde social and moral standards, because the pool of people who refuse to listen, or who respond only with anger, grows.
63 posted on 11/02/2002 8:52:09 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Something is wrong here. Hutch is winning the Indy vote, but is losing overall. They are about the same with their party votes...so obviously they over sampled the RATS.

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner.

64 posted on 11/02/2002 8:56:12 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: churchillbuff
Stand up for morality.

Put an ally of Bill Clinton in office.

66 posted on 11/02/2002 8:56:47 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: Lando Lincoln Cheesehead
I have the same reaction. All of a sudden divorce is a dirty word when it comes to Hutchinson in AR.

Divorce is one thing I dont' believe is anyone's business since none of us can walk in their shoes. If someone hasn't been there, they have no idea what made a marriage go bad! And you certainly don't take it out on a politician when it happens on a daily basis to all sectors of the Country!

69 posted on 11/02/2002 8:58:39 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Looks like the promise-breaker's getting his comeuppance. Why did he have to run again after dumping his wife? Why couldn't he step aside and let someone without baggage be the nominee? BECAUSE HE'S SELFISH AND SELF-CENTERED!
70 posted on 11/02/2002 8:58:50 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

Comment #73 Removed by Moderator

To: churchillbuff
I dunno, seems to me that punishing the country and continuing the destruction of our juducial system(not to mention delaying by at least 2 years, if not more, most major conservative initiatives) because one wants to 'send a message' a rather selfish act. Not to mention short-sighted, self-defeating, and a pyrrhic victory.(look it up)
74 posted on 11/02/2002 9:06:08 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
DUMP YOUR WIFE, LOSE AN ELECTION.

As opposed to get enraged, and throw the election?

75 posted on 11/02/2002 9:07:36 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Looks like the promise-breaker's getting his comeuppance. Why did he have to run again after dumping his wife? Why couldn't he step aside and let someone without baggage be the nominee? BECAUSE HE'S SELFISH AND SELF-CENTERED!

Once again, I ask you for your evidence. People with integrity don't drop dirty accusations, then fail to prove them.

People with integrity also don't post the same response 5 times on one thread.

76 posted on 11/02/2002 9:08:48 PM PST by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: conservative_2001

LOL.... Don't strain him too hard. Hell he can't even fly his state flag.

78 posted on 11/02/2002 9:11:08 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I share your frustration and I'm obviously not as close to the circumstances in AR as you. And, I believe the right has a higher moral standard than the left. However, I wish the electorate could see that the greater good can be served by voting Hutchinson. But, we are where we are.
79 posted on 11/02/2002 9:13:06 PM PST by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

Frankly, I'm getting really fed up with all these so-called "conservatives" who come in here and attack Tim Hutchinson. They make vicious accusations, then fail to provide evidence of their charges, no matter how many times I ask them.

I've questioned every "conservative" I've seen who has accused Tim of having an affair, asking them for their evidence of this charge, and every single one of them runs from me.

They come here to bash his integrity, but don't have the integrity themselves to prove their charges. Real conservatives know better.
80 posted on 11/02/2002 9:13:30 PM PST by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson