Skip to comments.
AR POLL: US Senate (Tim Hutchinson (R) 43% v Mark Pryor
51% )
katv.com ^
| 11/02/2002
| Arkansas News Bureau/Stephens Media Group
Posted on 11/02/2002 8:04:26 PM PST by KQQL
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Spirit of Arkansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search KATV news internet
|
|
Return to index page
If the election for the US Senate were held today, would you vote for...
|
|
|
|
Tim Hutchinson (R) |
Mark Pryor (D) |
Undecided |
43 % |
51 % |
6 % |
This is the fourth survey conducted by ORA on this race since August. The three previous surveys were conducted for the Arkansas News Bureau/Stephens Media Group:
|
|
August |
September |
October 1 |
Hutchinson (R) |
41 % |
40 % |
43 % |
Pryor (D) |
51 % |
50 % |
48 % |
Undecided |
8 % |
10 % |
9 % |
Hutchinson and Pryor are virtually tied in name recognition. Pryor's favorable rating is higher than Hutchinson's and Pryor also has a lower unfavorable rating than Hutchison:
|
|
Favorable |
Mixed |
Unfavorable |
Don't recognize or can't rate |
Total Name Recognition |
Hutchinson (R) |
52 % |
4 % |
35 % |
9 % |
91 % |
Pryor (D) |
60 % |
4 % |
29 % |
7 % |
93 % |
Pryor leads Hutchinson in the First, Second and Fourth Congressional Districts, while Hutchinson leads Pryor in the Third District:
|
|
First District |
Second District |
Third District |
Fourth District |
Hutchinson (R) |
36 % |
37 % |
58 % |
42 % |
Pryor (D) |
57 % |
57 % |
36 % |
54 % |
Undecided |
7 % |
6 % |
6 % |
3 % |
Hutchinson and Pryor are virtually tied in the support they receive from their respective parties. Hutchinson furthermore leads among Independents:
|
|
Democrats |
Independents |
Republicans |
Hutchinson (R) |
8 % |
51 % |
85 % |
Pryor (D) |
86 % |
44 % |
9 % |
Undecided |
6 % |
6 % |
5 % |
Pryor leads among voters with a high school education or less while the two are virtually tied among voters with some college education. Hutchinson leads among college graduates:
|
|
Some HS |
HS Grad |
Some College |
College Graduate |
Hutchinson (R) |
34 % |
34 % |
48 % |
52 % |
Pryor (D) |
63 % |
58 % |
47 % |
44 % |
Undecided |
4 % |
8 % |
6 % |
4 % |
Pryor leads among voters 35 and older while Hutchinson leads among younger voters:
|
|
18-35 |
35-44 |
45-54 |
55-64 |
65+ |
Hutchinson (R) |
61 % |
38 % |
44 % |
47 % |
37 % |
Pryor (D) |
34 % |
56 % |
50 % |
52 % |
55 % |
Undecided |
5 % |
6 % |
7 % |
1 % |
8 % |
Pryor leads among retirees and white collar workers, while Hutchinson leads among white collar voters:
|
|
White Collar |
Blue Collar |
Retired |
Hutchinson (R) |
51 % |
43 % |
39 % |
Pryor (D) |
45 % |
53 % |
54 % |
Undecided |
4 % |
4 % |
7 % |
Pryor leads among voters whose yearly incomes fall below $50,000 per year and Hutchinson leads among voters with incomes $75,000 or more. The two are virtually tied among the $50,000-$75,000 per year income group:
|
|
<$20K |
$20-30K |
$30-40K |
$40-50K |
$50-75K |
>$75K |
Hutchinson (R) |
34 % |
41 % |
44 % |
47 % |
48 % |
56 % |
Pryor (D) |
60 % |
52 % |
50 % |
51 % |
49 % |
39 % |
Undecided |
6 % |
8 % |
6 % |
2 % |
3 % |
5 % |
Hutchinson and Pryor are virtually tied among whites while Pryor holds a substantial lead among African-Americans:
|
|
White |
African American |
Hutchinson (R) |
47 % |
15 % |
Pryor (D) |
48 % |
75 % |
Undecided |
5 % |
9 % |
Pryor leads among both men and women:
|
|
Male |
Female |
Hutchinson (R) |
44 % |
42 % |
Pryor (D) |
51 % |
51 % |
Undecided |
5 % |
7 % |
|
Methodology Opinion Research Associates, Inc., of Little Rock, interviewed 500 randomly selected registered voters in Arkansas who said they were planning to vote in the November General Election. Interviews were conducted by telephone during the evenings of October 23-25, and on Saturday October 26, 2002. Interviews were conducted statewide and divided equally among the state's four congressional districts, with 125 interviews completed in each district. The margin of error for a random sample of 500 registered voters = ±4.5 percentage points, at the 95% level of confidence. This means that the 95% of all random samples of this size will produce percentages that can be expected to vary, as a result of random variation, by no more than 4.5 percentage points from the true population parameters. Percentages calculated on smaller subsamples will have a somewhat larger margin of error depending upon the size of the subsample. For example, the margin of error for each of the congressional districts is approximately ±9 percentage points. Occasionally percentages may not add up to 100% because of rounding error. |
Return to index page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
1
posted on
11/02/2002 8:04:26 PM PST
by
KQQL
To: KQQL
don't believe it....
To: KQQL
Opinion Research Associates, Inc., of Little Rock, interviewed 500 randomly selected registered voters in Arkansas who said they were planning to vote in the November General Election. "Registered" voters. Not "likely" voters.
Next...
To: BlackRazor; Free the USA; Torie; paul544; deport; Coop; ambrose; fern
Oh well..
4
posted on
11/02/2002 8:06:27 PM PST
by
KQQL
To: KQQL
Crap! So much for the 47-40 edge nationally, eh?
To: All
Let's see what ZOGBy comes with in AR poll...
6
posted on
11/02/2002 8:08:39 PM PST
by
KQQL
To: KQQL
I'm not an Arkansas resident but I see that Pryor leads in groups of which I'm part of: female, over 35, making under $50,000/yr.
7
posted on
11/02/2002 8:09:09 PM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: KQQL
Yup, I'll wait for some confirmation from a more reputable poll... but I think Hutchinson is toast in any event.
8
posted on
11/02/2002 8:09:52 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: KQQL
Looks like the promise-breaker's getting his comeuppance. Why did he have to run again after dumping his wife? Why couldn't he step aside and let someone without baggage be the nominee? BECAUSE HE'S SELFISH AND SELF-CENTERED! (Just ask the wife he dumped). Don't tell me that the way somebody behaves toward their wife and family doesn't say something about how they'll behave in the political realm. CHARACTER COUNTS. If he would put selfishness ahead of his vows to his wife, why WOULDN'T he put selfishness ahead of the interests of the Republican PArty?
To: KQQL
Percentages calculated on smaller subsamples will have a somewhat larger margin of error depending upon the size of the subsample. For example, the margin of error for each of the congressional districts is approximately ±9 percentage points. Is this normal?
To: KQQL
I wish it were true. This one would sting our ex-Purjurer-in-Chief.
To: KQQL
The newpaper/pollster is owned by Stephen's in AK aren't they allies of the Clinton's?
What is their track record?
12
posted on
11/02/2002 8:14:57 PM PST
by
Leto
To: KQQL
Arkansas, don't give up: don't let the 'rats win.
To: KQQL
9% surveyed don't know who Hutch is? But only 7% don't know who Pryor is? Bad sample, too small a sample,...
To: Leto
You are reaching. Hutchinson is toast.
To: KQQL
Terrible news. This one will take a miracle if it's not gone already.
Why couldn't Hutchinson keep his pants on?!?
To: ambrose
DUMP YOUR WIFE, LOSE AN ELECTION.
To: comebacknewt
Why couldn't Hutchinson keep his pants on?!?
Or, why couldn't he choose not to run this year, after creating a personal scandal for himself? There would have been other, stronger GOP candidates, but this selfish lout insisted on having his cake and eating it too.
To: conservative_2001; Coop; rightwingbob; DeaconBenjamin; Congressman Billybob; Vis Numar; mwl1; ...
Poll Ping!
If you want on or off my poll ping list, let me know!
To: Leto
Don't be an idiot.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson