Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/02/2002 8:04:26 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: KQQL
don't believe it....
2 posted on 11/02/2002 8:05:42 PM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Opinion Research Associates, Inc., of Little Rock, interviewed 500 randomly selected registered voters in Arkansas who said they were planning to vote in the November General Election.

"Registered" voters. Not "likely" voters.

Next...

3 posted on 11/02/2002 8:06:00 PM PST by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackRazor; Free the USA; Torie; paul544; deport; Coop; ambrose; fern
Oh well..
4 posted on 11/02/2002 8:06:27 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Crap! So much for the 47-40 edge nationally, eh?
5 posted on 11/02/2002 8:08:20 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
I'm not an Arkansas resident but I see that Pryor leads in groups of which I'm part of: female, over 35, making under $50,000/yr.
7 posted on 11/02/2002 8:09:09 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Percentages calculated on smaller subsamples will have a somewhat larger margin of error depending upon the size of the subsample. For example, the margin of error for each of the congressional districts is approximately ±9 percentage points.

Is this normal?

10 posted on 11/02/2002 8:11:41 PM PST by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
I wish it were true. This one would sting our ex-Purjurer-in-Chief.
11 posted on 11/02/2002 8:13:23 PM PST by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Arkansas, don't give up: don't let the 'rats win.
13 posted on 11/02/2002 8:16:01 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
9% surveyed don't know who Hutch is? But only 7% don't know who Pryor is? Bad sample, too small a sample,...
14 posted on 11/02/2002 8:17:07 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Terrible news. This one will take a miracle if it's not gone already.

Why couldn't Hutchinson keep his pants on?!?

16 posted on 11/02/2002 8:17:56 PM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative_2001; Coop; rightwingbob; DeaconBenjamin; Congressman Billybob; Vis Numar; mwl1; ...
Poll Ping!

If you want on or off my poll ping list, let me know!

19 posted on 11/02/2002 8:19:25 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Just remember what the LA Slimes did to Simon. They skewed their poll to show Davis ahead by 8 points. The RNC was so surprised, they investigated and discovered the LA Slimes had used 51% dems and 36% repubs for their poll, giving Davis the edge.

When the RNC redid the poll, they came out with only a 2% lead for Davis.

I have a feeling this is what's going on with all the "too close to call races". If the actual numbers were known, it wouldn't be so close. The dems are hoping the repubs will think "we're already behind, we're going to lose - why bother voting".

We must get people out to vote. I'm going to be precinct walking again tomorrow. Talk to everyone you know!
24 posted on 11/02/2002 8:22:27 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Folks.......The unfavorabe/favorable ratings are virtually the same despite Hutchinson's actions. How on Earth can he be down so much??? I am thinking voters may be rejecting him for another reason besides his moral lacking.
26 posted on 11/02/2002 8:25:15 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
This is part of an orchastrated dem effort to lie about the numbers in an effort to keep republicans home. Won't work, Terry.
44 posted on 11/02/2002 8:35:50 PM PST by mysonsfuture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Is anybody suppose to take seriously a poll put out by a TV station? If Hutchinson is so far behind,why is GWB and Cheney wasting their time by campaigning in Arkansas for him?
51 posted on 11/02/2002 8:42:56 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Something is wrong here. Hutch is winning the Indy vote, but is losing overall. They are about the same with their party votes...so obviously they over sampled the RATS.
52 posted on 11/02/2002 8:42:58 PM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
I just peaked at the weather forecast for Arkansas and I noted with a certain amount of glee that "rain and storms"are forecasted for Tuesday!
56 posted on 11/02/2002 8:46:06 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
I am not a resident of Arkansas, however I do know a little about statistics (BS in math), and the methodology as it is described is full of holes. They do not have the 95 confidence factor except in an abstract dreamland--great for determining the likely results of a similar poll, not neccesarily including the actual election.
58 posted on 11/02/2002 8:47:35 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Is there time too dump this wife and go back to the original?
81 posted on 11/02/2002 9:17:20 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KQQL
Yup, Hutchinson is toast. What is it with Arkansas politicians and infidelity? Hutchinson deserves to lose. Let's make up the loss elsewhere.
142 posted on 11/04/2002 7:18:07 AM PST by JoeMomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson