Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Claude Frédéric BASTIAT: THE LAW
The Federal Observer ^ | 1850 | Claude Frédéric Bastiat

Posted on 10/23/2002 3:15:00 PM PDT by 45Auto

The Doctrine of the Democrats ~

The strange phenomenon of our times -- one which will probably astound our descendants -- is the doctrine based on this triple hypothesis: the total inertness of mankind, the omnipotence of the law, and the infallibility of the legislator. These three ideas form the sacred symbol of those who proclaim themselves totally democratic.

The advocates of this doctrine also profess to be social. So far as they are democratic, they place unlimited faith in mankind. But so far as they are social, they regard mankind as little better than mud. Let us examine this contrast in greater detail.

What is the attitude of the democrat when political rights are under discussion? How does he regard the people when a legislator is to be chosen? Ah, then it is claimed that the people have an instinctive wisdom; they are gifted with the finest perception; their will is always right; the general will cannot err; voting cannot be too universal.

When it is time to vote, apparently the voter is not to be asked for any guarantee of his wisdom. His will and capacity to choose wisely are taken for granted. Can the people be mistaken? Are we not living in an age of enlightenment? What! Are the people always to be kept on leashes? Have they not won their rights by great effort and sacrifice? Have they not given ample proof of their intelligence and wisdom? Are they not adults? Are they not capable of judging for themselves? Do they not know what is best for themselves? Is there a class or a man who would be so bold as to set himself above the people, and judge and act for them? No, no, the people are and should be free. They desire to manage their own affairs, and they shall do so.

But when the legislator is finally elected -- ah! then indeed does the tone of his speech undergo a radical change. The people are returned to passiveness, inertness, and unconsciousness; the legislator enters into omnipotence. Now it is for him to initiate, to direct, to propel, and to organize. Mankind has only to submit; the hour of despotism has struck. We now observe this fatal idea: The people who, during the election, were so wise, so moral, and so perfect, now have no tendencies whatever; or if they have any, they are tendencies that lead downward into degradation.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bastiat; commies; liberty; socialists
This is an excerpt from the full work of Bastiat, possibly the best known of the 19th Century anti-Socialists. His warnings and commentary are as true today for the US as they were for France in the 1800's.I see there are a lot of archived postings from the works of Bastiat on FR. This is just a little reminder.His definition of the Democrat fits so well about half the US Senate today.
1 posted on 10/23/2002 3:15:01 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
This work ("The Law") is one of the best, clearest and easiest to understand arguments for Liberty and against Statism. It should be required reading.
2 posted on 10/23/2002 3:21:09 PM PDT by Chairman Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chairman Fred
I gave my copy of "The Law" to a young friend who recently graduated from USC's Law school. He's already established with a law firm, has won his first case, and ... he'd never heard of Bastiat.
3 posted on 10/23/2002 3:29:41 PM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
You can buy a case of 100 for $150 from Laissezfaire books.

I like to give these away as gifts.

http://laissezfairebooks.com/product.cfm?op=view&pid=IN8397

4 posted on 10/23/2002 3:31:32 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Bastiat was a badass. I discovered his work by accident about two years ago, on the internet. I have never heard his name mentioned, even in passing, throughout the course of my education - and I'm about to graduate from college in December.
5 posted on 10/23/2002 3:35:19 PM PDT by Schmedlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
~ What Is Law ? ~

"What, then, is law? It is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense. Each of us has a natural right--from God--to defend his person, his liberty, and his property"

"These are the three basic requirements of life, and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other two. For what are our faculties but the extension of our individuality? And what is property but an extension of our faculties?"

"If every person has the right to defend -- even by force -- his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly. Thus the principle of collective right -- its reason for existing, its lawfulness -- is based on individual right."

"And the common force that protects this collective right cannot logically have any other purpose or any other mission than that for which it acts as a substitute."

If an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force -- for the same reason -- cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups."

"Such a perversion of force would be, in both cases, contrary to our premise. Force has been given to us to defend our own individual rights."

"Who will dare to say that force has been given to us to destroy the equal rights of our brothers? Since no individual acting separately can lawfully use force to destroy the rights of others, does it not logically follow that the same principle also applies to the common force that is nothing more than the organized combination of the individual forces?"

"If this is true, then nothing can be more evident than this: The law is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all."

And, hence,the 2nd Amendment follows logically.

6 posted on 10/23/2002 4:57:26 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Something else that I've always wondered about the second amendment, in regards to the foolish notion that the second amendment only applies to the "militia." Why would we need an amendment to recognize the right of the militia to bear arms? Was this to stop the government from disarming the militia? Do we expect the militia to use rocks and sticks, when called upon? And if the second amendment only applied to the militia, why wouldn't it read, "... the right of the militia to keep and bear Arms..."?
7 posted on 10/24/2002 10:17:39 AM PDT by Schmedlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Is Bastiat the antidote to Marx?
8 posted on 10/24/2002 10:23:38 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
GOOD POST!!

-Bastiat Fan

9 posted on 10/24/2002 10:25:39 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson