Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Governor Speech on Budget Reductions
VA Governor's Website ^ | 10/15/2002 | Mark Warner

Posted on 10/15/2002 4:55:39 PM PDT by GummyIII

Press and Policy > Events and Speeches

Address to the Commonwealth on Additional Budget Reductions (Oct. 15, 2002)

View Summary Report on Budget Reductions (pdf, 208 Kb)

View archived Webcast of this speech

Speech sections:

Introduction
Budget Introduction
Early Budget Cuts
More Reductions Needed
Decisions on Spending Cuts

Start at the Top
Improve Efficiency
Preserving Services to People
Effect on Vital Services
More Targeted Reductions
Conclusion

Introduction   #Back to Top back to top

Good Evening.

Before I begin my remarks about our budget, I must address a more immediate reality. For the past thirteen days, the series of random sniper attacks in and around Virginia has made us all concerned about the safety of ourselves and our families, and we must remain on guard. Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and their families.

Throughout this time, I have been in constant contact with state, local, and federal law enforcement officials.

We have made all state resources available to the manhunt, and our law enforcement officers are working night and day. Make no mistake about it: We will find those who have committed these crimes, and we will prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

But I asked for broadcast time tonight, because I want to talk to you directly about the significant financial challenge facing state government.

Budget Introduction   #Back to Top back to top

When I assumed office nine months ago, my business experience told me that there would be tough budget decisions to make. The roots of our budget problem were clear.

In the late 1990s, state spending grew significantly, and simultaneously more than 50 new tax breaks were enacted. In short, the state increased spending and cut revenues at the same time.

This could be sustained only as long as the record prosperity of the 1990s continued. But over the long term, businesses can't operate that way. Families can't operate that way. And state government won't operate that way.

As the economy cooled, the structural imbalance in the state budget became clear. The national recession and the economic effects of the September 11 attacks made the problems worse.

Early Budget Cuts   #Back to Top back to top

The budget shortfall I inherited totaled $3.8 billion when I took office. Working with the General Assembly — Democrats and Republicans alike — we balanced the budget on time. In doing that, we made many difficult choices.

We cut state spending. We used half of the state's "rainy day" reserve. We authorized tuition increases at public colleges and universities.

We froze car tax reimbursements. We reduced contributions to employee retirement accounts. And we've shrunk the size of state government by more than 3,700 employees since January.

None of these actions was easy, but they allowed us to balance the budget and preserve critical state services.

This past spring, national experts said the economy was poised for recovery. But with corporate scandals and the plummeting stock market, the economy continues to struggle along. In fact, last fiscal year, Virginia saw the largest decline in state revenues in the 40 years the Tax Department has kept records.

Virginia is not alone in this situation. Virtually every state — and nine of ten states in the southeast — saw record declines in their income tax collections this past spring.

More Reductions Needed   #Back to Top back to top

By late summer, the state's leading business executives and our best economists advised me to lower our economic forecast, and I adopted their sound advice. This new forecast means we now must plan for $1.5 billion less revenue than we had originally projected for our current two-year budget. In late August, I reported this shortfall to the General Assembly, and I set out a timetable with which to address the shortfall in a prudent, businesslike fashion.

In many ways, this latest $1.5 billion seems unreal — just like any large number on a page. So, perhaps two examples will bring it into scale.

To produce savings of $1.5 billion, we could have eliminated all funding for State Police, Sheriffs, local police, and all general district courts for the next two years. Or, we could have eliminated the state share of salaries and benefits for more than 59,000 public school teachers.

Obviously, we wouldn't do either of these, but they do illustrate the seriousness of the problem. And unfortunately, the problem does not stop there. This is more than just a revenue shortfall problem.

There are also a number of spending issues we have very little control over — more students in our public schools and colleges, surging costs for medical care and health insurance, an increasing number of prison inmates, and the continuing cost of the most severe drought that Virginia has seen in decades. When these costs are factored in later this year, the budget problem will exceed the $1.5 billion we're now facing.

After addressing the General Assembly in late August, I took a number of immediate actions. I imposed strict monthly and quarterly spending limits on every state agency and college. I restricted all new hiring of state employees and consultants. And I directed my staff to help my government efficiency commission — the Wilder Commission — to develop specific proposals for consolidating agencies or eliminating functions of state government, and that panel will report in December.

Finally, I directed state agencies to prepare three separate proposals to cut their own budgets by seven, eleven, and fifteen percent. I asked for these three levels so that I could assess the specific impacts of each cut proposed. By law, the Governor may not cut individual agency spending by more than 15% unilaterally. Anything above that level requires General Assembly approval.

Decisions on Spending Cuts   #Back to Top back to top

State agencies have submitted detailed reduction plans that total more than 2,000 pages, and we have spent the last few weeks analyzing them line-by-line.

I have consulted with legislators from both parties, and my staff gave detailed briefings on the reduction plans to every legislator who requested one. I have asked legislators their views on what services should be protected and what services should be eliminated entirely. I am grateful to those legislators who took the time to be part of this process. Having their input has been very helpful.

This has been a careful and deliberative process. Because what's at stake are services we expect from state government, Virginia's financial standing, and the well-being of our state workforce.

Last week, I was gratified when all three financial rating companies re-affirmed Virginia's triple-A bond rating, the highest rating possible. In particular, these financial experts commended our pro-active, yet conservative, approach for dealing with our revenue shortfall.

Our priorities are clear in what we have protected from cuts, at least for now — State Police and local sheriffs, basic state support for public schools, long-term care for the elderly and disabled, and health care for low-income Virginians to note a few examples.

Start at the Top   #Back to Top back to top

So today, after completing this careful process, I directed state agencies to begin implementing budget reduction plans that will save $858 million over the next two years.

These cuts begin with the Office of the Governor, where I will reduce the budget of my office by more than 17 percent, and I will reduce my own salary by 20 percent.

The budget reductions for each agency average close to 11 percent and range up to 15 percent. Again, 15 percent is the maximum amount the law allows me to cut. Excluding state colleges, 63 of the 91 state agencies will have their budgets reduced by the 15 percent maximum amount in at least one year.

One thousand eight hundred thirty-seven (1,837) full and part-time state employees will be laid off — ranging from senior management to entry-level. All eligible employees will receive the full severance benefits they are entitled to under the law.

These totals do not include the impact on state colleges and universities, whose Boards of Visitors must approve their final reduction plans. Their preliminary plans indicate that about 4,500 additional layoffs could occur, but the colleges and universities may choose to raise tuition or use other balances to offset these cuts. That being said, layoffs in higher education will probably number in the thousands.

Improve Efficiency   #Back to Top back to top

Throughout this process, we have forced agencies to re-examine longstanding practices. We've tried to bring business principles to state government. Some of these reductions will actually improve the effectiveness of certain agencies.

  • By re-thinking the way we operate, we'll be able to eliminate redundant management layers in the Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Corrections.
  • We'll consolidate payroll processing for over 40 agencies into a single small unit at the Department of Accounts.
  • We'll privatize mail service for a number of agencies using the Department of Treasury.
  • We'll make better use of the Internet in a variety of agencies to send out publications electronically instead of through print.
  • And we'll re-negotiate contracts in today's economic environment, when companies are willing to provide significant discounts to gain our business. The Department of Social Services did this recently, and they were able to save more than $800,000 on a single contract.

There obviously are other opportunities for additional long-term savings in the way state agencies buy goods and services — in the way the state acquires and uses computer technology — and in the way the state manages its personnel processes.

We will continue to pursue these opportunities in the weeks to come, and we will offer specific proposals when we submit our budget in December.

Preserving Services to People   #Back to Top back to top

But most of these decisions have not been so easy, and they have often meant selecting the lesser of two bad choices. In the end, we have chosen to maintain direct services to people as our first priority.

For example, we decided to cut clerical staff for parole, so that we could maintain parole officers themselves — even though that decision will force parole officers to spend more time on administrative duties, and less time in the field.

We decided to cut pollution prevention activities, so that we could maintain actual water quality monitoring and testing. We decided to cut health education programs, so that we could continue actually providing health care and medical services.

In each of these areas, and many others, we were forced to make the painful choice to cut investments that may actually save money over time. I understand that, and I am committed to restoring them as soon as the economy allows.

Effect on Vital Services   #Back to Top back to top

At the end of the day, a budget shortfall of this magnitude cannot be solved with sound bites about "cutting the fat." These budget reductions will affect vital services that Virginians count on, and there should be no attempt to disguise that fact. Let me give you some specific examples.

  • Every DMV office across the state will close one day a week. Twelve branch offices will close permanently.
  • State support for local and regional libraries, and educational TV and radio will be reduced by 15 percent. The Library of Virginia will close one day a week, and many local libraries may shorten their hours as well.
  • State support for local and state museums and the arts will be reduced by 15 percent. Some state museums will close one additional day a week.
  • State support for cooperative extension will be reduced by 12 percent a year, eliminating 147 extension agents, faculty, and support positions.
  • Funding for state colleges will be further reduced from 9 to 13 percent. Cuts for each college and university will vary, based on tuition level and percentage of students from outside Virginia. The result will be larger classes, fewer course offerings, and for some students, perhaps additional time in order to graduate.
  • State assistance for students who attend private colleges will be reduced 13 percent.
  • State support for community mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse services will be reduced 10 percent. I know community service boards will make every effort to preserve services for their clients with most urgent needs, but unfortunately thousands of Virginians will wait longer for the services they need or have their services limited.
  • State funding for Commissioners of the Revenue, Treasurers, and Clerks of Court will be reduced 11 percent, and Commonwealth's Attorneys will be reduced 7 percent.
  • Half of the funding designated for maintenance and roof repair in state facilities will be eliminated.
  • Capital grants for local and regional airport improvements will be reduced 15 percent.
  • State ABC stores will reduce their operating hours.
  • Funding for a salary increase for public employees in fiscal year 2004 will be eliminated, but I will continue to look for ways to restore this raise as the economy allows.

More than 140 other programs will see their funding reduced. Examples include:

  • soil and water conservation districts
  • industrial site development
  • workforce training
  • animal welfare inspections
  • tourism promotion
  • small business development
  • ports and harbors
  • Area Health Education Centers and
  • indoor plumbing grants.

A listing of dollar reductions for every agency is available here. (pdf, 208 Kb)

More Targeted Reductions  #Back to Top back to top

These $858 million in budget reductions will come close to balancing the budget for fiscal year 2003. We will also consider options such as reserves in the "rainy day" fund and other balances we can draw down. But when the General Assembly meets in January, more cuts will be necessary, particularly for fiscal year 2004.

Simply continuing to make each program leaner, however, will not solve our problem. We have to recognize that some programs and agencies will not be able to do their jobs if they are cut further.

It is therefore time to acknowledge that some programs and agencies will need to be fundamentally altered or eliminated entirely. So again, between now and my December budget proposal, I will submit my plans for consolidating agencies and eliminating programs to the General Assembly for its consideration and approval.

Finally, we have to acknowledge that some of the programs we have protected so far — like public schools and Medicaid — may have to be cut later on.

Conclusion   #Back to Top back to top

These decisions have not been easy, and I have not made them lightly. I know this is going to hurt, and that it will have a dramatic impact on many Virginians who depend on state services, on thousands of students in our colleges and universities, and on the state employees who will lose their jobs.

Now this process has been tough, and it may get tougher. I understand that many Virginians will disagree with the savings we have made, and they will do so publicly. That is the strength of our system.

But for those who are quick to criticize this situation solely for political gain, I have a simple challenge: if there is a better way — show us. For every budget reduction you disagree with, tell us where you would make an offsetting cut.

Virginia has weathered tough fiscal times before, and we will get through this one as well. The foundation of our economy is diverse and therefore strong, and we are poised for our nation's economic recovery. We have one of the best workforces in the country. And Virginia continues to offer an unparalleled quality of life.

As Virginians, we all take pride in the leading role our Commonwealth played in America's first century. I believe Virginia can lead America again in the 21st century. But to do so, we have to answer some fundamental questions about the very nature of what we expect from state government.

  • How do we educate our children and grandchildren for tomorrow's jobs?
  • How will we sustain the excellence we have come to expect from our colleges and universities?
  • How will we keep our communities safe?
  • How do we promote economic growth so that all Virginians can get good jobs?
  • How do we protect our environment and enhance the quality of life around Virginia?
  • What kind of transportation system — what kind of health care system — what kind of mental health system do we expect in the 21st century?

These are the kinds of questions that we'll need to address over the weeks and months to come. It's a conversation not just for elected officials, but for all of us.

Since taking office, I have pledged to work cooperatively with our other elected officials, and to talk straight with the people of Virginia. I believe that has been our record so far, and I intend to continue it. And as taxpayers, you deserve to know that your elected officials will act as good stewards of your tax dollars.

Virginians are heirs to a long tradition of fiscal responsibility, and tonight we re-commit ourselves to maintaining that tradition. By doing so, we will help build the foundation of a brighter economic future for all our people.

I appreciate the chance to speak with you tonight. Good night, and God Bless the Commonwealth of Virginia.

# # #

Governor of Virginia - Mark R. Warner
Copyright 2002



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: budgetcut; reduction; speech; warner
I just left a meeting of educators who decided he could get his whole budget cut if he'd just get rid of the VA DOE.
1 posted on 10/15/2002 4:55:39 PM PDT by GummyIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
Go ahead and flame me, Virginia FReepers, but in the context of the DC Sniper situation, I've had a chance to see Warner speak for the first time.

He strikes me as an incredibly wimpy, bleached blond, New Age, unprincipled media boy.

OK, go ahead, have at it.
2 posted on 10/15/2002 5:02:14 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hey,I suspect most of us would agree with you. I didn't vote for him! THe Republican candidate was slightly less wimpy. I miss George Allen (and even his sucessor, James Gilmore).
3 posted on 10/15/2002 5:05:31 PM PDT by GummyIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
Well at least your governor sounds like he's doing something. Looking at some of his points:
Every DMV office across the state will close one day a week. Twelve branch offices will close permanently.
Can you do any of the DMV paperwork over the internet? I think it is possible to renew your license in WA. I hope so as I never want to step foot in that archaic swamp again.
State ABC stores will reduce their operating hours.
What is the state doing selling booze?
Funding for a salary increase for public employees in fiscal year 2004 will be eliminated
Welcome to the real world, state employees!

Simply continuing to make each program leaner, however, will not solve our problem. We have to recognize that some programs and agencies will not be able to do their jobs if they are cut further.
Oddly he doesn't mention that some jobs the state just shouldn't be doing.
4 posted on 10/15/2002 5:06:30 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Alcohol is controlled/regulated in Virginia in ABC stores. We can do most of our DMV paperwork on the 'net, now. This is the second year state wages have been frozen. I don't have a problem with that except social workers and eligibility workers are having more and more work dumped on them with no more pay. They don't get comp time or overtime, but they work it anyhow. Of course we both know it's the whole system that needs fixing. As for cutting funding that needs cutting but isn't/won't be, that was my point above. DOE is top priority in my book.
5 posted on 10/15/2002 5:11:53 PM PDT by GummyIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
I just left a meeting of educators who decided he could get his whole budget cut if he'd just get rid of the VA DOE.

My opinion:

Despite that Warner is a not all that bad as Dem's go, I think he is mainly posturing here.

Maybe not. But there are still all kinds of questions I'd like to know the answers to. Even so, VA is not a bad state. You should see the things they pull off in California when the bucks get tight.

The first things they do are to stop picking up garbage in the parks and to decrease the number of hours when the libraries are open. It get worse after that.

6 posted on 10/15/2002 5:16:55 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
I just left a meeting of educators who decided he could get his whole budget cut if he'd just get rid of the VA DOE.

My opinion:

Despite that Warner is a not all that bad as Dem's go, I think he is mainly posturing here.

Maybe not. But there are still all kinds of questions I'd like to know the answers to. Even so, VA is not a bad state. You should see the things they pull off in California when the bucks get tight.

The first things they do are to stop picking up garbage in the parks and to decrease the number of hours when the libraries are open. It get worse after that.

7 posted on 10/15/2002 5:17:15 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
I have to laugh at myself. Based on your post, I realized that Warner is a Dem! I had been assuming that he was a Republican (combo I suppose of Warner last name and assumption that VA has gone quite Republican), and was really ashamed to have him in the party.

Now that I realize he's a Dem, well, I can feel good about feeling bad about him!
8 posted on 10/15/2002 5:32:19 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
Wow! I wish we had some Republicans who would start talking like this!
9 posted on 10/15/2002 6:03:20 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Last time I renewed my Virginia. driver’s license I did it thru their web site. It was painless. I was amazed. Ya just create yourself an account, click. Give them your credit card number, click click. Two days later your new license arrives in the mail. Very nice web site they got. Even got a discount on the fee for doing it on the net. I should send a thank you note to Al Bore. Hell, maybe I’ll send him one of them E-Mail things.
10 posted on 10/15/2002 6:40:21 PM PDT by CJinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
We've been through these cycles before in Virginia. (Because there is no provision for running a deficit)

In '92 the Dept of Education in Virginia was reduced from 800 to 600 employees with the stroke of a pen.
All 800 had to re-apply for their own jobs... like musical chairs. Only 600 hired.

I don't work there... it was in the papers.
11 posted on 10/15/2002 6:48:40 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
You are right on target.
12 posted on 10/16/2002 6:58:34 AM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Can you do any of the DMV paperwork over the internet?

Yes. Also by mail.

State ABC stores will reduce their operating hours. What is the state doing selling booze?

Hopefully this will lead to much past due privatization.

Funding for a salary increase for public employees in fiscal year 2004 will be eliminated...Welcome to the real world, state employees!

Two considerations here: 1) It's true that a lot of state employees need to go, but 2) There are some that are necessary and they've been in the real world since 1999, the last time they received a salary increase.

13 posted on 10/16/2002 7:07:23 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
I was around for the budget reductions during Wilder's term. IMHO, Warner has dilly-dallied around with this mess for 5 months! They've known that tax revenues have been way below projected since at least July and they are just now getting around to doing something about it?! Gimme a break.

I really hate to sound like an old timer but....back when Wilder was administering budget reductions, reduction plans were required within 2 weeks and cuts were announced within a week after that. None of this 5 month nonsense.

He kept going on and on about his business experience. If he had been running a business that was running in the red like this and took 5 months to do something, they'd be filing chapter for bankruptcy.

And the slurping - man oh man - how bush league can he get? Did he not practice before giving this speech?

And one other point, all the tv stations aired this speech but wouldn't air the President's speech last week? Wasn't that speech just as important? Aaarghhh.

Sorry to go on such a rant. The guy just annoys me to no end.
14 posted on 10/16/2002 7:08:51 AM PDT by iceskater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iceskater
IMHO, Warner has dilly-dallied around with this mess for 5 months! They've known that tax revenues have been way below projected since at least July and they are just now getting around to doing something about it?! Gimme a break.

You aren't paying attention. This is the second round of cuts. The first round amounted to cuts of $3.8 billion dollars in the two-year budget (Virginia has a two-year budget cycle). These cuts are in addition to that first round.

There was a report on the DC news (which has been mostly covering the shootings) where they briefly interviewed a woman who said she voted for Gilmore because he wanted to eliminate the car tax, and now she thinks that the state needs more tax revenue, so she supports the sales tax increase that's up for a vote in November for NoVa roads.

15 posted on 10/16/2002 7:45:36 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
No, I've been paying attention but you are right, this is the 2nd round of cuts for this fy. There will be at least one more after this one, too. The General Assembly will have to do more for this fy to balance the budget when they meet in January.

My irritation is that the governor, et.al. have known since at least July that revenues weren't coming in as projected. Instead of doing something in August (like when Wilder was governor), he's fiddled while Rome burned and waited 5 months to issue agency cuts. That's 5 months of payroll. The delay has just made it harder to meet the reductions.

The TV/radio/newspaper coverage here has been superceded by the sniper coverage also. I did see some poor slob from the Dept. of Taxation practically crying on TV (channel 12 in Richmond) about all the poor state employees who are going to lose their jobs. It was embarrassing to watch him. For heaven's sake, 1800 jobs is less than 2% of the state workforce. This is not exactly lines of state employees homeless on the streets of Richmond. It's horrible for the people who are losing their jobs but for crying out loud it's not the apocolypse. Sheesh.
16 posted on 10/16/2002 8:08:03 AM PDT by iceskater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: iceskater
No, I've been paying attention but you are right, this is the 2nd round of cuts for this fy. There will be at least one more after this one, too. The General Assembly will have to do more for this fy to balance the budget when they meet in January.

OK, sorry, I thought it sounded like you meant this was the first "cutting" that had been done at all. There is some timing involved, as the cuts might potentially push wavering sales-tax voters toward a "yes".

17 posted on 10/16/2002 8:17:19 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Leave it to a Democrat to not know how to cut a budget. He cuts the things that makes money for the state - DMV and ABC. When I do my personal budget I don't begin by quitting my job.
18 posted on 10/16/2002 8:26:58 AM PDT by BSunday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
OK, sorry, I thought it sounded like you meant this was the first "cutting" that had been done at all.

No problem. Actually, my department is taking between $750K and $1M before this is all over. I could just as easily get laid off as any one else.

There is some timing involved, as the cuts might potentially push wavering sales-tax voters toward a "yes".</I.

Sigh. I think you're right. This makes sense on why he delayed and delayed and delayed. He wants that sales tax increase in No.Va. and Hampton and the bond issues to pass. He's spent the last month running around the state telling people how horrible the cuts will be, etc. How Clintonian of him!

19 posted on 10/16/2002 8:31:15 AM PDT by iceskater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson