Skip to comments.
Nobel Peace Price: Did the Right Man win?
BBC News ^
| Oct.11,2002
| BBC News
Posted on 10/11/2002 11:01:32 AM PDT by Molly Pitcher
From the BBC:
Post your comments here about Jeemy's win!
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiusagenda; jeeemycarter; nobelpeaceprize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: Molly Pitcher
Since my comment will likely never see the light of day on their leftist board, I'll post it here:
As a professional apologist and excuse-maker for murderous despots including Yasser Arafat, Fidel Castro, Hafez al-Assad, and Kim Il Sung, Mr. Carter is the perfect choice for this hypocritical and comical award.
BTW, don’t miss this wonderful old chestnut (or should I say “peanut”):
The Trite Stuff - Reflections of an ex-president (Classic, priceless Carter bashing)
41
posted on
10/11/2002 12:25:31 PM PDT
by
dead
To: Molly Pitcher
I think, and this is just one cat's opinion, mind you, that Richard Chamberlain should have won! Why? First he negotiated peace with Hitler, then he went on to play peace loving Dr Kildare, and finally he became a peaceful, award winning basketball player. A perfect candidate!
To: Revolting cat!
Fashionably merry, too! (Or "gay" - I always get these synonyms confused!)
To: Revolting cat!
Richard Chamberlain gay? Oh how sad. Such a waste of manhood.
To: Molly Pitcher
To: Molly Pitcher
Jimmy Carter is not a naive simpleton. He is an disgraceful, Arab arse-kissing (His Carter Center is 90% funded by Saudis), Arafat speechwriting, Marxist traitor. He should be shunned by all Americans.
His "legacy" since leaving office is one of appeasement of dictators and marketing Yasser Arafat the murderer as Arafat the "statesman", with thousands of innocent victims' blood on his hands as a result.
To: Molly Pitcher
Ick, I just found out the Jimmah won the Nobel peace prize. Are we never to be rid of the dem presidents??? We now have to listen to his sanctimonious speeches ad nauseum. One good thing though, x42 is probably gnashing his teeth right now...
To: Molly Pitcher
Carter is the 2nd worst president in my lifetime (Slick has him beat by a nosehair)..... His legacy will be building dwellings for losers, not his term in office. He's such a loser. Too bad he gets $ for being such a loser.
To: Molly Pitcher
See - even a peanut farmer can win
To: b4its2late; The Raven; All
I just checked...the same comments are there as when I posted this thread hours ago....
To: Molly Pitcher
The trouble with the PC method of foreign policy is that (take for instance Iraq) - you don't get the assurance that it will work - or that it will last.
Tis better to remove the offending party (take for instance - Saddam)
What would Jimmy Carter have done with the Cuban missiles? Left them there?
To: Molly Pitcher
The trouble with the PC method of foreign policy is that (take for instance Iraq) - you don't get the assurance that it will work - or that it will last.
Tis better to remove the offending party (take for instance - Saddam)
What would Jimmy Carter have done with the Cuban missiles? Left them there?
To: The Raven
Well, that's it exactly. A show of will and strength is the more
likely deterrent, and thus produce the peace which the left says is their goal.
And of course, in contrast, weakness or perceived weakness increases the risk of war, aupposedly what the left wants to avoid.
That should be the lesson of the '90s and our weak reaction to the terrorist actions of that decade.
Jeeeeeemy et al. think they can talk the evildoers out of their ways! Talk about hubris!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
