Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Focus is on hydrogen (BANKRUPTING THE SAUDIS ALERT)
The Daily Telegraph ^ | October 10, 2002 | Jesse Crosse

Posted on 10/10/2002 2:11:29 AM PDT by MadIvan

If you are wondering how we will all get around once the oil wells run dry, you might take comfort from Ford's latest hydrogen fuel-cell electric Focus. It goes into limited service with commercial fleets in 2004.

It currently exists as a one-off prototype valued at about £2.65 million but while its price might make an insurance broker blush, its performance won't have the same effect. It has the kind of urge usually associated with a 2.5-litre Mondeo and its refinement is surprisingly convincing.

Appearing at this year's Challenge Bibendum, an event described by organiser Michelin as "a rolling roadshow for environmentally friendly vehicles", the Focus joined more than 50 other contestants ranging from a vegetable oil-fuelled VW Golf to a standard petrol-powered Alfa Romeo Brera. Inaugurated in 1998, the event ran from Los Angeles to Las Vegas last year, via the cloying dust and dry heat of the Nevada Desert (Motoring, Nov 10 2001). This year's soggier route - from Heidelberg to Paris - gave us a glimpse of what we can expect to be driving in future.

For many, the end-game is the fuel-cell engine that consumes hydrogen and air to generate electricity, with heat and water as by-products. Using pure hydrogen, fuel cells produce no planet-warming carbon dioxide (CO2 ) and, assuming the hydrogen is also manufactured on a CO2 -free basis, guarantee a guilt-free trip.

But with the hydrogen economy a way off yet, short-term plans to reduce exhaust emissions in conventional cars include alternatives such as natural gas and bio-fuel made using rapeseed oil or even alcohol. The European Commission is advocating the use of these eco-blended fuels as a matter of urgency and this year's Challenge Bibendum reflected that. With so many different kinds available, however, life could become complicated. So far the most taxing decision car buyers face is whether to stick with the standard radio or splash out on a six-CD autochanger. Will we cope with choosing between ethyl-tertiary-butyl-ether or vegetable oil methyl esters? Probably not.

Hybrid entries, such as the Toyota Prius, Honda Insight and new Honda Civic IMA (due in the UK next year), will play a role in cutting fuel consumption and CO2 but fuel-cell lobbyists insist the global car population is expanding so fast that CO2 levels will be back where they started in just a few years. For them, the fuel cell is the only answer and work is progressing quickly. In fact, the improvement in Ford's Focus FCV (fuel-cell vehicle) Bibendum entry beggars belief when you compare it with last year's version.

Accompanied by fuel-cell programme marketing manager (and former F15 pilot) Phil Chizek, test engineer Brian Gillespey and planning analyst Mark Sulek, the Focus endured a two-hour fuel consumption test around the Hockenheim grand prix circuit, near Heidelberg, and outpaced a production Toyota Prius in the process. Later, it completed a three-day trip from Hockenheim to Paris in the hands of sceptical hacks. "This is no hand-built mule cobbled together in a research lab," said Chizek. "It's the first prototype from the production programme and the first to be made using production processes and production tooling."

It also has a unique body made from aluminium, stainless steel and carbon-fibre, which saves 300kg compared with a standard Focus and partially offsets the extra weight of the new 902 fuel-cell engine from Canadian company Ballard.

From the driving seat, the Focus FCV starts silently and is a revelation compared with its predecessor. The irksome rasp of a hidden compressor forcing air into the fuel-cell engine has been all but replaced by subdued sighs and whispers of discreet aerospace technology when the throttle is squeezed. The electric motor characteristically underwrites its modest 88bhp with substantial torque of 170lb ft, roughly equivalent to that of a 2.5-litre V6 and easily enough to cope with the cut and thrust of Strasbourg's rush-hour traffic. Later, in gathering gloom and humming along at 60mph on the open road, the most intrusive sounds were the wind and tyres rolling over tarmac. But with a potential top speed of 115mph and the ability to accelerate to 62mph in 13.5 seconds, the performance of the Focus is already on a par with a conventional family car.

We stopped for fuel after 50 miles, in the informal surroundings of a French transport cafe car park. Pure compressed hydrogen was piped from a tanker into the Ford's boot-cramming, cylindrical fuel tank at a pressure of 5,000 pounds per square inch. Minutes later, we were on our way, carrying enough fuel to take the Focus 200 miles. Stringently tested 10,000psi tanks are in the offing and will double that range, so it almost seems as if the future has arrived sooner than expected.

Despite the huge strides being made, manufacturers agree that significant numbers of fuel-cell vehicles won't appear in private driveways until at least 2010. Given the rate of progress demonstrated by Ford in the past 12 months, however, that possibility becomes more believable by the minute.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: autoshop; energylist; focus; ford; hydrogen; saudis; science; stuffthesaudis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
We should be working on fuel cells as a matter of defence priority. I don't really care about the Green arguments - I suspect they'll be against this as they are more interested in reducing us to primitivism rather than technological developments - but if we produce these vehicles, we yank the rug out from underneath the Saudis, Iranians and Iraqis. They'll be reduced to throwing rocks at low flying British and American bombers on another raid. The entire edifice of terror will lose its ability to finance itself.

How fitting that Ford, which revolutionised cars the first time with the creation of the Model T, is planning to do so again with this. And this revolution will help us be the eventual winners in the war on terror.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 10/10/2002 2:11:29 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty; JeanS; schmelvin; MJY1288; terilyn; Ryle; MozartLover; Teacup; rdb3; fivekid; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 10/10/2002 2:11:56 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
2010 sounds like such a long time, but I guess it isn't. They day I can flip off the arabs and their oil, is the day the world will be just a little better. Can't wait.
3 posted on 10/10/2002 2:34:35 AM PDT by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
You are correct. Cold fusion should be investigated, too.

In the UK in the 6/2/02 Times there was an article confirming the original findings.

The article was, of course, removed in the issues sent to the US.

REASON: The US State Dept and Sen Biden are determined,
with others, to keep the US dependent upon oil,
despite the Constitution and Congressional requirements
for encouraging inventors.

4 posted on 10/10/2002 2:36:40 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paul544
We all should be conserving petrol when we can - not just to save money, but to bankrupt the Saudis. Each penny we cause the price of crude to drop, is a sum that can't find its way into Al Qaeda's pockets.

Regards, Ivan

5 posted on 10/10/2002 2:39:56 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
One thing we should also remember - one thing that helped the long post-World War II boom was cheap fuel. With the advent of a hydrogen based economy, cheap energy will be back in style. And this time the Arabs won't have a monopoly on it.

Regards, Ivan

6 posted on 10/10/2002 2:44:25 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paul544
Okay, I'm really confused...

It seems like these vehicles would solve a lot of the problems of pollution, gasoline consumption, arab oil dangers, etc. But when I read this thread and This thread, I start to wonder: Are they simply slowing the production and perfection of these type of vehicles until they can create new taxes that driving them would demand? A Hydrogen tax? A low-emmission tax? An Arab- Recompensation tax?!

OK, tin foil off....

7 posted on 10/10/2002 2:46:37 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
What we have here is good old fashioned competition between technologies--hydrogen vs. fish and chip oil.
8 posted on 10/10/2002 2:47:44 AM PDT by UKCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UKCajun
I'll go for hydrogen. I'd rather not be reduced to going to fish and chips shop, asking for my Plaice and Chips and for a fill up.

Regards, Ivan

9 posted on 10/10/2002 2:49:47 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Picture that!
10 posted on 10/10/2002 2:50:34 AM PDT by UKCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UKCajun
How about BP Cooking oil on special in ASDA!
11 posted on 10/10/2002 2:51:52 AM PDT by UKCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
You need electric power to make this hydrogen. So what are you going to burn to make it? Oil, gas, coal?

Are you hanging on hydro-electric or nukes to generate the electricty? Are you going to pave over half of New Mexico with photo-voltaic cells? Will you make it with wind turbines?
12 posted on 10/10/2002 2:52:28 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Use nuclear energy and coal - sources which do not require the Saudis.

Regards, Ivan

13 posted on 10/10/2002 2:53:45 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"We should be working on fuel cells as a matter of defence priority."

Where do you get the idea the fuel cells are NOT being worked on?? All the major auto companies are working on them, as are many different US government agencies, including various ones in the DOD.

14 posted on 10/10/2002 2:55:07 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
What ever happend to the Water engine?
15 posted on 10/10/2002 2:58:48 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
I remember when the Humvee first rolled out. They said that the engine could burn gasoline, diesel, kerosene, even perfume or lighter fluid.
16 posted on 10/10/2002 2:59:15 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
My guess is when you burn coal to run hydrogen-powered autos you are utilizing 20% of the energy captured in coal.

One way or another you will waste the other 80%
17 posted on 10/10/2002 2:59:31 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
And nuclear?

Regards, Ivan

18 posted on 10/10/2002 3:01:29 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
What? You mean the idea of placing 2 electrodes in H2O, seeping the hydrogen from one of them and burning it in an engine? As soon as I get some extra $$$, I'll get right on it.
Actually, I've been thinking of that idea since I saw the electrolysis experiment in my 8th grade science class.
19 posted on 10/10/2002 3:01:59 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The most primitive and efficient way to use coal is for heating. You can approach 85%-100% efficiency there. Uranium can never be used in such a basic way....cannot be used in a simple furnace or cook stove. Nuclear yields energy for man only via electricity generation.

With the starting point that "nuclear yields energy for man only via electricity generation" I would guess that nuke generated electricity will be 75% utilized by the time it's hydrogen finally powers an automobile. 25% will be lost from transmission lines, from generating the hydrogen, from filling fuel cells, then finally generating power in the automobile from the fuel cell.

20 posted on 10/10/2002 3:16:42 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson