Posted on 10/07/2002 4:46:37 PM PDT by rohry
Market WrapUp for the Week The Week in Graphs Storm Watch Geopolitical News Energy Resource Page Precious Metals Raw Materials Monday, October 7, 2002 The Cauldron is Bubbling Over Despite these declines, stock prices are still too expensive. That is because earnings have declined much faster than prices. Not a day goes by but we hear of one company after another follow each other in unison with warnings over revenues, earnings, more job layoffs, restructuring charges, writedowns, or some disappointment. Wall Street is trying to put the best face on matters with standard clichés. I watched one money manager defend his position with the glib cliché that hes optimistic and you have to look at the long run. Nobody wants to admit that we are in a protracted bear market that is the result of a bubble deflating. This bubble will deflate and the bear market will continue until such time as the pendulum swings to the extreme. At bear market bottoms, nobody will want to own stocks and P/E multiples and dividend yields will reflect values that will be enticing. We are a long way off form that point. We're only in the second phase of this bear market and it hasnt completed its cycle. I believe there will be a bear market rally and then the final third phase of the bear market, which will be the final wash out. We're far from a bottom despite the wishful spin coming out of Wall Street. Worry Menu Grows Troubled Financial Sector Were talking just about the financial sector here. There are also plenty of rogue waves and ten-sigma events lying around the geopolitical seas. We can start with an impending war, which the President will address in his speech to the nation tonight. In a war, armies kill and blow things up. Lives are lost, property is destroyed and governments are toppled. War introduces more uncertainties for the financial markets and they abhor uncertainty. This upcoming war wont be like the last war since the objectives are much more complex. A regime change is being planned and that means there will be an occupation force in the region for quite some time. A $100-$200 billion war budget implies different objectives and a different strategy with multiple outcomes. If things go well in the initial battle ,there may be cause for celebration. It is what happens afterwards that leaves a big question for the financial markets. Rebuilding a nation or a government is a lot more difficult than defeating an army on the battlefield and making it go back home. So take your pick from either the financial sector, here and around the globe, or the geopolitical minefield and it isnt hard to understand the gyrations in the financial markets. There is plenty to worry about and it is doubtful whether risk control programs have ten-sigma events programmed into their formulas, especially geopolitical risks. He Just Doesn't Get It ... or He Just Doesn't Admit It Mr. Greenspan also went on to praise the growing mountain of leveraged derivatives in our financial system as healthy too. Financial derivatives have grown at a phenomenal pace over the past fifteen years. (He thinks this is good!) Conceptual advances in pricing options and other more complex financial products, along with improvements in computer and telecommunication technologies, have significantly lowered the costs of, and expanded the opportunities for, hedging risks that were not readily deflected in earlier decades. [Speculation opportunities have also grown exponentially.] Moreover, the counterparty credit risk associated with the use of derivative instruments has been mitigated by legally enforceable netting and through the growing use of collateral agreements. [Most contracts are OTC contracts which makes them less liquid and subject to price implosion in the event of a crisis. Derivatives are concentrated in fewer players today and make an event risk like LTCM even more likely.] These increasingly complex financial instruments have been especial contributors, particularly over the past couple of stressful years, to the development of a far more flexible, efficient, and resilient financial system than existed just a quarter-century ago. [Event-driven risks are increasing with each new crisis, bigger than the last. JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America hold most derivatives. Their portfolio makes Enron and LTCM look conservative.] The Sword of Damocles Over Metal Shorts
LTCM boxed itself into a corner by increasing its leverage as credit spreads widened and ten-sigma events multiplied. The gold shorts are doing the same thing. As more money moves into bullion and into precious metals, the shorts will be forced to cover. They are hoping that things will be much more subdued and quiet when they do. What they are hoping is that the divergence /convergence theme remerges. Thats what their models tell them and thats what they hope will happen. However, we would suggest with a upcoming war, a slumping economy, growing defaults, bankruptcies, widening credit spreads, rising default premiums, Argentina and next Brazil, divergences are widening -- not converging as their models would suggest. It is just a question of which rogue wave overwhelms them, or worse yet, a series of rogue waves which could in fact be a hundred footer as experienced in the Halloween Perfect Storm of 1991. Today's Market Wall Street is screaming for another Fed induced bailout. They want interest rates to be lowered to zero if necessary. Not that it would help. Just look at Japan if you want to see the efficacy of lowering rates. The Japanese Nikkei fell to 8,688 down from over 39,000 12 years ago. There is absolutely no reason to buy right now. The only thing that has made money this year is shorting the markets and going long gold and precious metals. Even in the washout of the third quarter, the metals held up superbly. You would have to go back three decades to find another time when there was this much uncertainty. Expectations are still far too high as are valuations. NYSE daily lows are back at levels of where they were back in July of this year. The VIX closed at 49.18, up nearly three points for the day. The volatility index is not quite at levels that we saw during the July plunge, but we are slowly getting there and in fact may surpass it. The VXN jumped over 60 to 62.32. It looks like it still wants to rise. We still have a way to go and it appears like it is going to take massive intervention to forestall a decline. Like all crises under Mr. Greenspan's reign, the Fed is more than willing to oblige. Do I hear hyperinflation floating in the air? The next round of intervention in the markets should be not only be breathtaking to watch, but historical in its precedent. John Laws record may about to be surpassed. Volume levels came in at 1.54 billion on the NYSE and 1.40 billion on the NASDAQ. Market breath was decidedly negative by 25-7 on the big board and 25-9 on the NASDAQ. Overseas Markets Japanese stocks fell, with the Nikkei 225 Stock Average having its biggest drop in three months. Banks such as UFJ Holdings Inc. slid on concern the government may seize weak lenders and force their worst customers to fail. The Nikkei sank 3.8%, its biggest decline since June 26, to 8688.00. Bond Market © Copyright Jim Puplava, October 7, 2002 |
Thanks for doing my response to his comment. You saved my time ! :) It is tiring after a while to type in a same answer to the same repeated comments. Many people think that some stimulus package can get us out of current economic downturn. Even the massive taxcut and deregulation cannot save us from this trouble.
That is a secret.
Ok, What would you like Bush to do or say about the economy? He doesn't need to say anything to me about it. We are darn lucky the economy isn't worse off than it is. Hopefully, Bush is working behind the scenes to get the Senate back. If he gets it back, then the policy wonks can tweak the economy with tax policy.
According to Daley, about 500,000 telecom-industry jobs have been lost and $2 trillion in market capital has evaporated in the last 18 months.
I am not applying for the job of political consultant, or strategist, or communications director, or chief of staff. I am not even saying that economic recovery hinges on the President saying anything. What I am saying is that political objectives depend on political success. When Ronald Reagan was president, the economy was much worse, and we were fighting a cold war. Somehow he managed to communicate his agenda on both issues at the same time. I wish this President would do the same.
Hopefully, Bush is working behind the scenes to get the Senate back. If he gets it back, then the policy wonks can tweak the economy with tax policy.
That's my point. If the President requires both the House and the Senate to be Republican majority in order to have an economic policy, then it seems to me he is less than effective in that area. Ronald Reagan never enjoyed such an advantage.
I would say the smartest thing Bush could do would be get rid of Greenspan. Unfortunately, he needed to get rid of him two years ago. The Fed is about to do to GW what he did to Bush I.
What you haven't learned that this is not a problem.
Don't worry, some WS whizo will be along shortly to post the lesson.
Unless you're going to try and closely time the market -- a difficult game which most people lose -- I recommend that you stay in cash or the nearest cash equivalent for some time. You'll sleep better.
It's never too late to get out, until the actual bottom. Not that you should try to time that either. When the next bull is clearly developing, you'll feel no desire to ask fellow freepers for advice.
If my limited memory is corrrect RR came on the scene facing Carters failed policies and inflation of almost 20%(we are still paying for that). Reagans Fed raised interest rates until they nearly drove us into a recession but he also got tax rates back down to earth which offset the pain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.