Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forrester Statement On New Jersey Supreme Court Decision
Forrester 2002 | 10/2/2002 | Forrester 2002

Posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:31 PM PDT by Politico2

Forrester Statement On New Jersey Supreme Court Decision

(TRENTON, OCTOBER 2) – U.S. Senate candidate Doug Forrester tonight issued the following statement:

“Today, the people of New Jersey lost. The Torricelli-Lautenberg machine’s disregard for the rule of law, fair elections and the people of New Jersey will, once again, make our great state the butt of national jokes.

“The good people of New Jersey understand what has transpired over the past few days. A few powerbrokers read public opinion polls and concluded that I was going to beat Bob Torricelli, and decided to change the rules of the game. The good people of New Jersey will not allow these political games to win the day.

“Today, this election became an election between, on the one hand, those who seek to restore New Jersey’s reputation and, on the other hand, those few powerbrokers who will say anything and do anything to rig the system to their advantage. I will continue my fight to restore dignity and honor the office of the United States Senate. And with the people of New Jersey, we will win this fight.

“Unfortunately, the New Jersey Supreme Court has now decided that New Jersey law, as written, should not apply to this election. Their decision is flawed.

“We will pursue an appeal of this matter to the Supreme Court of the United States, to ensure that the men and women of our military will not be disenfranchised and that the rule of law will be upheld.

“This is a fight that the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine began when it decided it could not win this election within the rules provided by state law.

“Regardless of the outcome in the courts, I will continue my fight to put the interests of the people of New Jersey before politics.

“The Torricelli—Lautenberg machine has failed to fight to strengthen our national security. The Torricelli – Lautenberg machine has consistently voted to cut defense and intelligence spending.

The Torricelli – Lautenberg machine voted against a national missile defense system to protect American families and our allies. The Torricelli—Laugtenberg machine has failed to clean more than 19 of New Jersey’s 132 Superfund toxic waste sites. The Torricelli—Lautenberg machine has consistently voted for higher taxes and against a Balance Budget Amendment. And under the Torricelli – Lautenberg machine, New Jersey has remained dead last among the states in getting a return on the tax dollars we send to Washington meaning our hardworking families continue to bear an enormous tax burden.

“These issues continue to confront us. These are the issues I have been speaking about since I entered this race. Theses are the issues I will continue to speak about until Election Day.

“Enough is enough. I will continue to stand against the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine. Hang on, New Jersey – help is on the way!”

-- 30 --

Paid for by Forrester 2002, Inc.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: lautenberg; military; missledefense; newjersey; nj; senate; senator; torch; torricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-290 next last
To: Political Junkie Too
Time's a wasting. Let's see if Lautenberg stalls on a debate. He only has 34 days now. Let's get this campaign moving. Does he really want a campaign or does he just want to stall his way in to the Senate?

Lautenberg needs to show the people of New Jersey what he's made of.

-PJ

21 posted on 10/02/2002 5:24:37 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Don't get mad -- Get the Senate!!! Let's all send $25 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee via www.nrsc.org.

I've only given to a candidate once and that was about 12 years ago. I'm giving again today! Those dirty, cheating S.O.B. Dems will pay in November.

22 posted on 10/02/2002 5:24:50 PM PDT by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
I don't know who said this guy didn't have issues, but clearly he not only has THREE good ones, but he has already got the phrase the "Torricelli-Lautenberg Machine" humming. This almost makes me suspect he knew the outcome before the Torch made his announcement and had the campaign ready to go.
23 posted on 10/02/2002 5:25:06 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Hi! I started a thread for research to help Forrester. Anyone who is interested should go here and help out:

Help Forrester! Opposition Reasearch on Lautenberg!!

24 posted on 10/02/2002 5:25:43 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
You must be mistaken Whitman for a Republican.

But Christie T. was a "moderate" and a GOP press darling!




25 posted on 10/02/2002 5:26:02 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

BINGO!

Now everyone with me...

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine

26 posted on 10/02/2002 5:26:08 PM PDT by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine

I like the linkage.

27 posted on 10/02/2002 5:26:14 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Outstanding statement! I think that Forrester will win....assuming that the votes are cast and counted without the fraud. That of course is a big assumption.

Hammer home on the "Torricelli-Lautenberg" point!
28 posted on 10/02/2002 5:26:27 PM PDT by Jerry Attrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I heard that there was a 4-3 split on the NJ Soprano Court. Four Democrats and three Republicans. I really do not understand why the three Republicans did not cast dissenting votes on this. Anyone have a clue? Or is it really a Soprano Court?
29 posted on 10/02/2002 5:26:30 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Well, I would be happy to impeach them, but since they have to be impeached by the legislature, which is a Rat majority, it isn't going to happen.

I think right now our best weapon is ridicule.

30 posted on 10/02/2002 5:27:20 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Good job Forrester
31 posted on 10/02/2002 5:27:41 PM PDT by The Vast Right Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Give 'em Hell, Doug!!!
32 posted on 10/02/2002 5:27:44 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
Wow. If the return for tax dollars in NJ is worse than here in CA, things must be pretty bad.

The numbers I've seen run in the 67 to 69 cents on the dollar range. Connecticut is about as bad.

Forrester should find the exact current numbers and use them in his ads. Put it this way, "For every dollar that New Jersey sends to the Federal government, we lose over 30 cents. That also means that for every dollar we cut in Federal taxes, over 30 cents stay in New Jersey. So why would New Jersey want a Senator who likes high Federal taxes?"

33 posted on 10/02/2002 5:28:15 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Great Speech, all the right words and I love this: I will continue to stand against the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine. Hang on, New Jersey help is on the way!?
34 posted on 10/02/2002 5:28:17 PM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Hey, Miss Marple, here's an ad suggestion. Just have the black screen that Forrester is using for his ads now. Flash "Torricelli-Lautenberg" and each time it flashes list something they have or have not done from the list above. The theme from the Sopranos can be the background music.
35 posted on 10/02/2002 5:28:55 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear
to lazy to type all that just put me down for the
TORCH AND LOUT MACHINE
36 posted on 10/02/2002 5:29:18 PM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Like this!

DEMAND DEBATES NOW!!!!

37 posted on 10/02/2002 5:29:25 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: linn37
I like it!
38 posted on 10/02/2002 5:29:49 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
"Not bad. But six of the judges were appointed by a Republican."

OK...but, who among us would choose to cross the equivalent of Tony Soprano?

39 posted on 10/02/2002 5:29:50 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Drop the lawsuit part of this speech, and you're on the right track Doug! Either BEAT the Lautenberg-Torch-Dashle-Xlinton Machine, or shut the hell up!! The SCONJ are scofflaws, and the Dims are thugs...but buck up and beat them at their own game. Period.

How is wussing out in the courts beating them at their own game?

40 posted on 10/02/2002 5:30:18 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson