Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forrester Statement On New Jersey Supreme Court Decision
Forrester 2002 | 10/2/2002 | Forrester 2002

Posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:31 PM PDT by Politico2

Forrester Statement On New Jersey Supreme Court Decision

(TRENTON, OCTOBER 2) – U.S. Senate candidate Doug Forrester tonight issued the following statement:

“Today, the people of New Jersey lost. The Torricelli-Lautenberg machine’s disregard for the rule of law, fair elections and the people of New Jersey will, once again, make our great state the butt of national jokes.

“The good people of New Jersey understand what has transpired over the past few days. A few powerbrokers read public opinion polls and concluded that I was going to beat Bob Torricelli, and decided to change the rules of the game. The good people of New Jersey will not allow these political games to win the day.

“Today, this election became an election between, on the one hand, those who seek to restore New Jersey’s reputation and, on the other hand, those few powerbrokers who will say anything and do anything to rig the system to their advantage. I will continue my fight to restore dignity and honor the office of the United States Senate. And with the people of New Jersey, we will win this fight.

“Unfortunately, the New Jersey Supreme Court has now decided that New Jersey law, as written, should not apply to this election. Their decision is flawed.

“We will pursue an appeal of this matter to the Supreme Court of the United States, to ensure that the men and women of our military will not be disenfranchised and that the rule of law will be upheld.

“This is a fight that the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine began when it decided it could not win this election within the rules provided by state law.

“Regardless of the outcome in the courts, I will continue my fight to put the interests of the people of New Jersey before politics.

“The Torricelli—Lautenberg machine has failed to fight to strengthen our national security. The Torricelli – Lautenberg machine has consistently voted to cut defense and intelligence spending.

The Torricelli – Lautenberg machine voted against a national missile defense system to protect American families and our allies. The Torricelli—Laugtenberg machine has failed to clean more than 19 of New Jersey’s 132 Superfund toxic waste sites. The Torricelli—Lautenberg machine has consistently voted for higher taxes and against a Balance Budget Amendment. And under the Torricelli – Lautenberg machine, New Jersey has remained dead last among the states in getting a return on the tax dollars we send to Washington meaning our hardworking families continue to bear an enormous tax burden.

“These issues continue to confront us. These are the issues I have been speaking about since I entered this race. Theses are the issues I will continue to speak about until Election Day.

“Enough is enough. I will continue to stand against the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine. Hang on, New Jersey – help is on the way!”

-- 30 --

Paid for by Forrester 2002, Inc.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: lautenberg; military; missledefense; newjersey; nj; senate; senator; torch; torricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-290 next last
To: Politico2
EXACTAMUNDO!!!!

Great statement, great sentiments.

Now let's knuckle down and WIN!!!
101 posted on 10/02/2002 6:01:42 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
And the big question is: Are the people of New Jersey going to be suckered with this illegal, immoral, unethical game of "this guy is a loser so let's get a new one at the last minute"?
102 posted on 10/02/2002 6:01:50 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
I agree. Lautenberg has been out of the fray for 2 years and is 78. I heard him interviewed a few months ago and I thought he was very incoherent. Doug should set a debate for next week and challenge Frankie to show up. And, they should be dredging the record for anti-war, anti-military votes by Frankie in his past. They should also be putting commercials out explaining to the voters of NJ the details of this political scam by the Dims. Counter punch hard and knock Frankie and the Dims for a loop, right now!
103 posted on 10/02/2002 6:02:03 PM PDT by HoosierFather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Thanks for the numbers. Doug Forrester needs to use them in his ads. He needs to use them in term of, "New Jersey loses 33 cents for every dollar it sends to Washington." Not only does this put the fact that New Jersey is losing money on its taxes but it brings into question the tax policies of the Democrats and makes a case for cutting taxes. New Jersey keeps 33 cents in the state for every dollar that taxes are cut.
104 posted on 10/02/2002 6:02:08 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Search: N.J. Supreme Court Order Violates Bush v. Gore by Chief Justice Rehnquist - posted on FR tonight. Sorry - don't know how to link.
105 posted on 10/02/2002 6:02:20 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
May I suggest you retrieve your license ... the good folks need you, Matt ...
106 posted on 10/02/2002 6:02:37 PM PDT by Pegita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
P.S. The folks in Floriduh are praying that this removes them from the bottom of the totem pole.
107 posted on 10/02/2002 6:03:02 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
A couple of you said you were willing to donate money to his campaign. Click here for the link to donate and learn more about Doug. Click the "Donate" tab to make a secure donation.
108 posted on 10/02/2002 6:03:27 PM PDT by Politico2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Jerry Attrick
assuming that the votes are cast and counted without the fraud.

Ummm, did you see that one of the Soprano Court stipulations was that the Democratic Party is responsible for reprinting the new ballots?

Nah, no potential for fraud there. Move along. Nothing to see.

109 posted on 10/02/2002 6:03:27 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Peach, with the new way John did things, you could just copy the link from the url at the top and paste it into the reply box to someone.
110 posted on 10/02/2002 6:04:07 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Christie Whitman? Not much of a Republican!
111 posted on 10/02/2002 6:05:41 PM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rep-always
Pray for this and all other elections

Bump. Pray for justice and may God bless our nation and restore to its people a deep reverence and respect for the principles and wisdom upon which it was founded.

112 posted on 10/02/2002 6:05:47 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I like the use of Torricelli/Lautenberg's machine in this release

I dunno. It's not plausible. It's a known fact that the two hate each other. It is the corrupt NJ Democrat machine that needs to go.

Hindsight's 20-20, but it seems the GOP lawyers blew it. They should have known the lay of the land. The argument was always going to be whether or not a remedy was feasible. It was never going to be about the letter of the law. They should have known that. Water under the bridge.

Now the job is to campaign and win. If they take their same inept lawyers to the next level, what do they expect to accomplish? I can tell you what they will accomplish: More embarrassment for NJ. More delays and chaos in this election. More politicization of our courts.

I'm just speaking off the top of my head. Maybe I am dead wrong. It has been a long, bad day today for anyone who lives in NJ and cares deeply about our government and our country. I am mad at the world today. So maybe I am wrong. But they won't win this in court. They have to campaign. Take the gloves off and slam these sleazebags.

113 posted on 10/02/2002 6:10:44 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Amen ...
114 posted on 10/02/2002 6:12:12 PM PDT by Pegita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Frank quit the Senate because he was going to lose to Whitman...he's not a dominating figure in New Jersey as his last election results show.

Forrester still should win this election, and the sleaze associated with this trick will really hurt the Carnahans, Johnsons, and Harkins who have to campaign under the Democrat ticket. You have to wonder what they think of this nice little gambit.

115 posted on 10/02/2002 6:13:19 PM PDT by Moosehead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: meyer
And anytime the word "machine" is used with regard to politics is a hard hit, imo. Conjures up images of cars full of bad guys running cars full of young boys delivering newspapers off the road, Mr Smith Goes to Washington style, and other such evils.
116 posted on 10/02/2002 6:15:08 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

117 posted on 10/02/2002 6:15:24 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Of course I do. But I don't want the USSC deciding election matters, either.

So you believe that the SCOTUS should've allowed Gore to win his selective recounts and be president now?

I want to know why Christy Witman has loaded the SCONJ with liberal scofflaws.

Probably because the Dems in NJ would've blocked anyone to the right of Alan Combs.

I want to know why the idiot that presented the Republican case to SCONJ got his butt kicked by the Dems.

1 day to prepare versus weeks for the Dems.

I want to know why the public educated NJ electorate is so corrupt that the majority would apparently keep Torch in as long as they have, and then blindly elect his backroom-dealing replacement over an milquetoast ?conservative? candidate.

Sheepleism. That's why we have to fight the Dems on their level, it's the only way to defeat them.

The democrats themselves aren't the only problem, and "beating" them in the courts is not the only solution.

We have to throw every weapon we have at them. They already control the media, the universites, the schools, the networks. And now you want to hand them the court system without a fight also?

118 posted on 10/02/2002 6:15:39 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: PubliusRevisited
Tom Paine would have had more fight in him than Sam.

BS. I'm saying kick Lautenwhoever's butt in the polls, not the courts, that's all.

BTW, Tom Paine was a liberal, proposed the first version of Social Security Taxes, and he died penniless, living on the welfare of others.

119 posted on 10/02/2002 6:16:01 PM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
" I HONESTLY thought Frank was about to have a stroke during his acceptance speech. He looks awful."

Over the last few hours, I have come to see Lautenberg as a gift. For anyone who missed his wandering and confused speech last night- I believe Great Grandpa Lautenberg has one foot in the Alzheimer's Unit. To imagine this man actually driving a car, is scary, let alone, being able to vote on life or death matters in the US Senate. The NJ Dems forgot to actually interview Frank, before offering him the slot-how are they going to hide Frank for the next 4 weeks?? Can anyone confirm that Lautenberg is actually still alive and not a New Jersey version of Weekend at Bernie's?? I eagerly await the debates-if Frank has not been declared legally incompetent by then.
120 posted on 10/02/2002 6:16:26 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson