Posted on 09/23/2002 10:27:24 AM PDT by Havisham
Agent: FBI Never Got 9/11 Data
By Bill Gertz
The Washington Times | September 23, 2002
An FBI agent told Congress yesterday that days before September 11 he complained to FBI headquarters that "someone will die" because senior bureau officials refused to permit him to pursue one of the men who later took part in the Pentagon suicide attack.
The New York-based FBI agent told a joint House-Senate hearing on the intelligence failures of September 11 that he and other FBI agents were denied CIA intelligence information on Khalid Al-Mihdhar and Nawaf Al-Hazmi.
The two al Qaeda terrorists would end up aboard the aircraft that flew into the Pentagon in a suicide attack.
The CIA had identified the two terrorists from a meeting in Malaysia in January 2000 but never informed the FBI, officials testified yesterday.
The FBI agent said a bureaucratic "wall" prevented intelligence from being shared in a criminal investigation of the two terrorists.
"This resulted in a series of e-mails between myself and the FBI headquarters analyst working the matter," the agent said.
The agent sent an e-mail message to headquarters complaining about the information blockage on Aug. 29, 2001: "Whatever has happened to this, someday someone will die, and, wall or not, the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems. Let's hope the national security law unit will stand behind their decisions then, especially since the biggest threat to us now, [Osama bin Laden], is getting the most protection."
The FBI agent's testimony is among numerous intelligence failures related to the September 11 attacks now being probed by Congress.
Earlier, Eleanor Hill, the staff director of the congressional panel, testified that numerous intelligence signs were missed.
Neither the CIA nor FBI was able to "see the potential collective significance of the information, despite the increasing concerns throughout the summer of 2001 of an impending terrorist attack," Mrs. Hill said.
The testimony made clear that legal restrictions that prevented sharing intelligence information that could be used in legal prosecutions were a major impediment in pursuing terrorists.
Mrs. Hill stated in testimony yesterday that Al-Mihdhar and Al-Hazmi lived openly in San Diego after being linked to al Qaeda in Malaysia. The two used their names on an apartment lease, took flight lessons and obtained and renewed visas.
The two men were placed on the State Department's watch list on Aug. 23, 2001, and the FBI in New York was prevented from investigating the two men.
The FBI agent and a CIA officer testified at the congressional hearing from behind a glass enclosure to obscure their identities.
After learning that Al-Mihdhar was one of the September 11 attackers, the FBI agent said: "I was upset. I remember explaining this is the same Khalid Al-Mihdhar we had talked about for three months."
The FBI was faulted at the hearing for failing to pursue an FBI agent's warning in a memorandum from Phoenix that U.S. flight schools should be investigated for possible al Qaeda terrorists. It was also blamed for refusing to obtain a surveillance warrant for a computer used by Zacarias Moussaoui, who has been charged in the September 11 plot.
The CIA did fully share its intelligence about the January 2000 terrorist meeting in Malaysia with the FBI, which was investigating the bombing of the USS Cole in October 2000.
The Clinton administration imposed new restrictions that prohibited sharing intelligence information with criminal investigators, according to U.S. officials. The restrictions were lifted after September 11.
Mrs. Hill, the inquiry staff director, testified that the CIA and FBI had no information linking 16 of the 19 hijackers to terrorism or terrorist groups before the attacks.
Al Qaeda terrorist leaders may have selected the terrorists because they were not well known to authorities, she said.
In addition to Al-Mihdhar and Al-Hazmi, U.S. agencies had information about Al-Hazmi's brother, Salim Al-Hazmi.
According to Mrs. Hill, the CIA was unaware that the National Security Agency, which conducts electronic eavesdropping, had gathered information on Nawaf Al-Hazmi, linking him to al Qaeda.
The NSA failed to share the information with the CIA, she said.
According to testimony yesterday, the CIA learned in March 2000 that Nawaf Al-Hazmi came into the United States through Los Angeles International Airport on Jan. 15, 2000.
Sept. 11 constitutes a catastrophic moral failure of America's intelligence bosses. Clintonism? Multiculturalism? Cultural Marxism? I say all of the above, the last being the most destructive to the thinking process of average Americans.
May I quote myself as a reply?
Nah. Just the bureaucracy eating its mission.
Incidentally, all the stuff about "it's Clinton's FBI"? Wrong. It was GWB's FBI from about noon on 20 Jan '01.
AIM's BIN LADEN GATE article and the links to back up AIM's thesis provided by dedicated Freepers to the subject help illuminate a dark subject. It is a lot of reading but well worth the effort.
AmericanInTokyo, in one of the linkes to the BIN LADEN GATE article (see above) the questions you asked regarding the FBI is touched upon. I think it is one of the posted links either mid way or at the end.
(The following article links can be found @ BIN LADEN GATE-see above)
INS says visas issued to terrorists because government agencies never told of their terror links
Agent Linked Pilot Trainees, Bin Laden (Chechens Attacked USS Cole-Bosnian 9-11 Connection Revealed)
F.B.I. Agent Says Superior Altered Report, Foiling Inquiry (Chechnya Link Was Ignored)
Stock Adviser and Bosnian Muslim Fundraiser Knew About 9/11 Attacks, U.S. Suggests
Why Didn't the FBI Fully Investigate Moussaoui? Agents joked that HQ infiltrated by agents of Osama
If you recall, Ashcroft, was not approved by the Senate until Aug. 2001, giving the Bush administration little time to get a handle on what was going on. Mueller and Tenet were on the job only two weeks before 9/11. Part of the strategy in contesting the Florida vote count for so long was to prevent the Bush administration from having transition money to be prepared to take over when they were sworn in. (They were able to raise money through contributions to do some of their work despite this.) Then the Senate went into their slowdown mode on appointees in order to keep their own guys and gals in office as long as possible.
The entire debacle belongs on the Clinton doorstep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.