Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Save America from the War Party
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 18 September 2002 | Ilana Mercer

Posted on 09/22/2002 7:06:08 PM PDT by Greybird

By agreeing to allow the unconditional return of weapons inspectors, Iraq has done well to expose – sadly, not halt – the Bush administration's unstoppable agenda.

This gesture by Iraq was not so much a "stunning turnabout" – as the media characterized it – but a culmination of a plain (and quite reasonable) attempt by an economically desperate Iraq to tie the return of inspectors to the lifting of sanctions. This failed!

Its predictably disgruntled response confirms that the Bush administration doesn't want Saddam to roll over, but wants, very plainly, to sock it to Saddam!

During his address to the U.N.'s General Assembly, Bush thundered about "Free societies" not being in the habit of intimidating "through cruelty and conquest." Was this, I wonder, a Freudian projection? Because "cruelty and conquest" are realistically what the Bush administration has in store for Iraq.

In the process of promising to wage war in the name of cherished American values, Bush has forgotten a pesky little detail: The U.S. government is beholden to the Constitution, which prohibits the president from declaring war, something he has, to all intents and purposes, already done. (The U.S. is already flying sorties over Iraq.)

The Congress alone can declare war on another nation. And only then can the president wage it. Waging war is separate from – and predicated upon – Congress' declaration, pursuant to deliberations.

Rather than go the constitutional route, Bush began by declaring his commitment to topple the regime in Baghdad, believing somehow that such a prerogative was a policy privilege he commandeered on being elected. The unconstitutional implications of Bush's audacious imperialism never really hit home with Americans.

Flouting his obligation to get "the consent of the governed," to quote the Declaration of Independence, Bush ended up seeking approval from the U.N., a World Hegemony entirely unrepresentative of – even hostile to – the American people. He is now bullying Congress to authorize war against Iraq before, you guessed, November's midterm elections. At this rate, Congress's vote will be no more than a formality. War will have been declared unconstitutionally by executive order!

By doing what Bush dreads, namely, acquiescing on inspectors, the Iraqis will inadvertently also unfurl the lattice of lies about Iraq that is serving to propel Bush's war.

The president's swirls of rhetoric before the U.N.'s General Assembly were not even tangentially related to the original indictment against Iraq. Remember that Iraq was accused of having a hand in Sept. 11, and directly supporting Islamic fundamentalist terrorism.

Iraq is a secular dictatorship profoundly at odds with Islamic fundamentalism. It made sense, then, when no less an authority than the former head of the CIA's counter-terrorism office, Vincent M. Cannistraro, stated categorically that there was no evidence for Iraq's links to al-Qaida. Soon the putative Prague meeting between Muhamad Atta, the ringleader of Sept. 11, and Iraqi intelligence, turned out to be bogus as well.

What remained for Bush to do was to pirate the old, pre-Gulf War narrative for his U.N. address. Devoid of new substantive facts, the speech is outdated by 11 years and one war. Lacking proof of Iraqi links to al-Qaida, Bush switched course and speculatively fixed on accusing Iraq of re-acquiring chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, as well as long-range ballistic missiles. Essentially, Iraq is being convicted based on a redux of her record during – and prior to – the Gulf War, not based on the current threat she poses to the U.S. and the region.

Enter Scott Ritter, true American patriot.

Ritter is a 12-year Marine Corps and Gulf War veteran. He is also a Republican. Most pertinent, Ritter was a former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq, and is much less cavalier than the president about sending Americans to die in Iraq. Equally grave are Ritter's misgivings about killing innocent Iraqis.

Ritter's case against such an attack is founded in reason and fact, not in political expediency. He understands the technology that goes into making, acquiring and detecting weapons of mass destruction. Having spent seven years inspecting and turning Iraq inside out, Ritter says Iraq has been 95 percent disarmed and has no weapons of mass destruction, an assessment backed by many experts in strategic studies.

This Third World nation – whose military prowess is now a fifth of what it was when hobbled during the Gulf War, the nation that has no navy or air force – is not a threat to American national security!

Based on Iraq's current behavior, an attack on her would defy the very foundations of international law, "which calls for the peaceful resolution of problems between nations." There is no moral argument for attacking a nation that has not aggressed against the U.S. According to this strapping ex-warrior, basic morality doesn't justify a war on Iraq.

Judging from the bipartisan slobbering the president's moral preening has elicited, Ritter's morals are like pearls before swine.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: a; barfalert; bwahahawhadamaroon; cinco; dimwit; disruptor; failedleftist; five; greybird; iiiii; inspections; iraq; is; jackass; jackbootlicker; kumbayada; stayignorant; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-244 next last
Interesting, isn't it, with the dedicated burrowing through WorldNetDaily each night, that this commentary didn't make it yet to FreeRepublic? This needs to be heard, along with the war fever.

I respect our young men and women in uniform too much to have them go into battle with a "bodyguard of lies," to borrow Churchill's idiotic comment about protecting the truth. George Bush isn't interested in the truth. He wants semi-plausible excuses for war.

1 posted on 09/22/2002 7:06:08 PM PDT by Greybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Greybird
Actually, THIS started the war, which began with the 911 Atrocities.


2 posted on 09/22/2002 7:15:48 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
Wehn Iraq released its phony "unconditional" offer for return of inspectors a vivid image popped into my mind. LUCY, CHARLIE BROWN and THE football.

You remember, every fall Lucy would offer to hold the ball for Charlie Brown to kick. Charlie hesitated, reminding Lucy that last year she pulled the ball away at the last minute, as she did the year before and the year before that.

But Lucy would tell Charlies that she wasn't going to fool him this time and that this tiem she really meant to hold the ball.

Of course, Lucy was insincere and Charlie would be fooled again into going flying as she pulled the ball away at the last moment.

Saddam is not sincere. We can not afford to be suckers.

3 posted on 09/22/2002 7:19:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
Are you Chamberlain reincarnated???? Or did you divine this all by yourself???
4 posted on 09/22/2002 7:23:48 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
pfffffffft.. "Our boys" are an all volunteer force (unlike Saddam's), so I am not so sure they want the likes of you "saving" them. 1998! 1998 1998 1998!! For crying out loud! It was only 4 years ago, how quickly people forget. There WERE inspectors there. They were hindered at every turn, and where they were able to look they did indeed find huge supplies of WMD. At NO point in the inspections did ANY of the inspectors (including blowhard Ritter) come to the conclusion that Iraq had halted its WMD program nor its attempts and desires to procure all forms of WMD including the treasured nuclear bomb.

One would have to be completely blind and naive beyond Forest Gump to believe that Saddam Hussein has any intention of full uninhindered inspections. Within days if not hours of the Kofi Annan backstab proposal, Iraq had already started squirming claiming that the Presidential Palaces will be off limits.. well DUH!! Hey Einstein, where do you think the WMDs are??? This article doesn't need a BARF alert, it needs a "DUMBASS LIBERAL" alert.

I was in the military when Clinton was president and let me tell you, the worst part of our morale was knowing that we were tools for the perps Wag the Dog missions. Having been in the military and knowing how military men think, I am certain that the majority of "our boys" are just itching to get some payback for 911. They sure as hell don't want people like you saving their lives by protecting Saddam Hussein, just so he can fund the next terrorist attack which kills their wives, mothers, and children. Believe me, they'd rather put their lives on the line, than watch 3000 more of their countrymen slaughtered like sheep with no way to protect themselves. So stop trying to protect "our boys" with INSANELY stupid politics.
5 posted on 09/22/2002 7:24:50 PM PDT by thedugal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
5
6 posted on 09/22/2002 7:27:34 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
The author is either incredibly ignorant of the facts at hand, or doesn't care to be bothered by them.
7 posted on 09/22/2002 7:27:52 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
By agreeing to allow the unconditional return of weapons inspectors, Iraq has done well to expose – sadly, not halt – the Bush administration's unstoppable agenda.

Well when an article starts with a provable lie there really isn't much point in reading it for anything except the amusement value.

Saddam’s offer was for military bases and facilities only. That is conditional.

a.cricket

8 posted on 09/22/2002 7:29:44 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird

9 posted on 09/22/2002 7:34:07 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
War! Huh! Yeah! What is it good for? Killing commie-pinkos - say it again!
10 posted on 09/22/2002 7:34:20 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
V
11 posted on 09/22/2002 7:34:33 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
In case anyone missed it:

5

12 posted on 09/22/2002 7:35:57 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
Dear Llana,
Dearie, you wouldn't know Scott Ritters pearls if he dropped them on your chest himself.
13 posted on 09/22/2002 7:37:26 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
War! An idea as old as time.
All we are saying, is give war a chance.
14 posted on 09/22/2002 7:39:08 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: justshe
5?
15 posted on 09/22/2002 7:39:50 PM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Greybird

16 posted on 09/22/2002 7:40:14 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
5
17 posted on 09/22/2002 7:40:57 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Raise you another 5!
18 posted on 09/22/2002 7:41:46 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Greybird

19 posted on 09/22/2002 7:43:21 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greybird

20 posted on 09/22/2002 7:44:49 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson