Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rehnquist may retire by '03, court observers say - Age, politics could lead to chief justice's exit
Associated Press ^ | September 22, 2002 | Associated Press Staff

Posted on 09/22/2002 9:47:48 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP


Rehnquist may retire by '03, court observers say

Age, accomplishments and politics could lead to chief justice's exit

09/22/2002

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist is 77, has been on the job for more than three decades and has a bad back, so retiring to read, write and work on his tennis swing would seem reasonable. But for Justice Rehnquist, the prospect of retirement is fraught with political consequences.

Retirement rumors have swirled around Justice Rehnquist for several years, and the judge is keeping his thoughts on the subject to himself.

But age, accomplishment and politics may combine to persuade him to make his exit, possibly after the upcoming term ends in June, say Supreme Court observers.

"Chief Justice Rehnquist's interests beyond the court are varied and dear to him, and I wouldn't be surprised if in the not-distant future he decided to pursue those interests," said Charles Cooper, a Washington lawyer who once served as a law clerk to Justice Rehnquist.

Justice Rehnquist has passed his 30th anniversary on the court, more than half that time spent as chief justice.

Once a lone ranger on the right, filing fierce dissents to his colleagues' often liberal rulings, Justice Rehnquist is now the arbiter of the court's increasingly conservative outlook.

"If the chief justice ends his term on the court this year, he will already have established himself as one of the three most important chief justices in history," said Walter Dellinger, a former chief Supreme Court lawyer for the Clinton administration.

If Justice Rehnquist leaves, Mr. Bush could choose to name a replacement from the remaining eight justices and then fill the vacant seat with an outsider. Only two sitting justices are considered candidates for the top job:

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman named to the high court when President Ronald Reagan picked her in 1981. She has said her age - 72 - makes the notion of an elevation to chief far-fetched.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, also a Reagan pick, in 1988. Considered a long shot, in part because many of Mr. Bush's conservative advisers resent his views on such issues as school prayer.

None of the justices has hinted at retirement, but advancing age and politics may persuade at least one to leave soon.

If that happens, the White House already has a list of potential replacements. Lawyers and law professors who watch the court have their own list. Among their picks:

Al Gonzales, Mr. Bush's White House counsel and the man in charge of making the White House list.

J. Harvie Wilkinson, the chief judge of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Va.

J. Michael Luttig, a junior judge on the 4th Circuit appeals court.

Samuel Alito Jr., named to the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Court of Appeals by Mr. Bush's father.


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/stories/092202dnnatscotus.54b1.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: judgeretires; judicialappointment; williamrehnquist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: American Soldier
Bump Pinochet formed his model government with University of Chicago economist.
21 posted on 09/22/2002 7:05:22 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
When he is in the majority on a vote, he decides which Justice will write the opinion of the Court. When he is in the minority, he decides who will write the minority opinion. In case of a presidential impeachment, he sits as judge over the Senate. Also, he has control over administrative matters in the Court and the appointment of various court officers.
22 posted on 09/22/2002 7:08:40 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
This is an excellent question. Here's my best, quick reply:

The CJ is an administrative position. He sets the agenda and controls functions, forms, rules, and schedules. He also gets the hottest limousine (I've saw Rhenquist's on the way out of the factory -- beeeautiful: short, discrete and very private with a solid rear-quarter as opposed to tinted glass).

Also, the CJ presides over the Senate during impeachment trials.

23 posted on 09/22/2002 7:15:47 PM PDT by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; JohnHuang2
If I were Bush, I'd go for a two-fer if Rhenquist were to retire:

1. Thomas as Chief Justice.
2. Emilio Garza from the 5th Circuit to be the new associate Justice.

The next to go would be O'Connor or Stevens. My bet is Stevens. O'Connor's locked in from 2004 due to some flap that occured during the 2000 election.

Alberto Gonzales would represent an improvement over Stevens by a long shot.

O'Connor? Replace her with either Posner from the 7th Circuit, or Luttig - who's got a good rep fromt he 4th Circuit.

Ginsberg might also go due to health problems. For that, I'll go with another Hispanic, this time Miguel Estrada.

So, hchutch's SCOTUS by the fall of 2005 (assuming purists do not sink Bush Jr. in 2004):

CJ Thomas
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Breyer
Garza
Gonzales
Luttig
Estrada

Now, how does that court sound?
24 posted on 09/22/2002 7:44:29 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Looks good to me. If you can figure out a way to replace Kennedy, Souter and Breyer I'll like it even better.
25 posted on 09/22/2002 7:48:19 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
That will be a while in coming.

Still, the six I have will be quite solid for a while, and Kennedy is not that bad, either.

Souter and Breyer are the only bad ones on the court. The rest are anywhere from good (Kennedy) to superb (Thomas and Scalia).
26 posted on 09/22/2002 8:10:26 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: VOA
LOL !
27 posted on 09/23/2002 7:48:26 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
This article misses the mark. First, Bush will and should elevate Scalia to the top post. (This is a certainty if the Republicans take the senate).

As for a replacement. The names mentioned certainly are not a surprise. But keep your eye on 5th Cir Court of Appeals Judge Garza. He is pro-life, Catholic, a Notre Dame grad, and hispanic. Dems would have a real tough time knocking him down. (Bush may save him for a loss in the Senate. Thus, if someone dies or must leave the Court and we don't have the votes, he may tap Garza to try to hurdle the Democrat litmus test. He will dare the dems to vote down a Hispanic Judge).

28 posted on 09/23/2002 8:02:28 AM PDT by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson