Posted on 09/13/2002 5:39:31 PM PDT by OldEagle
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THURS SEPT 12, 2002 10:09:41 ET XXXXX
CONTROVERSY AFTER PEOPLE MAG PICTURES CHELSEA CLINTON IN 'AROUSED' STATE
Editors at TIMEWARNER's PEOPLE magazine found themselves in controversy on Thursday -- after the weekly published a photograph showing former first daughter Chelsea Clinton in an apparent "aroused" state.
Clinton is shown "erect" as she is embraced by her companion Ian Klaus at last week's US OPEN tennis tournament; her face: showing "bedroom pleasures."
Publishing the provocative photograph of the media-shy Clinton is the latest attempt by new PEOPLE editor Martha Nelson to heat up the magazine. The snap is featured near the front of the book in the September 23 edition [Pg.24].
But the controversial shot of Clinton pulled mixed reviews -- even from within the magazine!
"I work here, I found it in very poor taste," a PEOPLE staffer told the DRUDGE REPORT from New York. "Why don't we just run a photograph of his hands down her pants?"
Editors defend the publication, noting Clinton's display was in a public setting.
Impacting...
LOL!!
It depends...
On just what that dude is doing with his "Harry Potter".
LOL!!!
Good Heavens, talk about an unserious Decade!!
When historians write about the 1993-2000 time frame, just WHAT are they gonna say??
While OBL set up a worldwide terror Apparat, we frittered away the better part of a Decade with Debauchery in the White House and beyond???
The only problem, with that in Salt Lake City was that Sarah Hughes' nipples popped out so far, and hard that it would have peeled the Bandaid right off her breasts.
No one, least of all herself, her coach, Robin Wagner, or the TV Camera People expected it.
During the performance, her nipples only popped out for two camera frames as she entered each jump, and immediatly relaxed as she came out to set up the next element in her performance.
It was only after she brought down the house, and skated toward Robin that her nipples fully erected, and that was captured on camera when she gave the jesture which most people interpreted as "who knew?!?!"
Then the ups and downs during the other skaters, coupled with Scott Hamilton's remark that if it was a tie, "Sarah wins the Gold", which in fact came true.
When she took to the Ice for the Medal ceremony, she unexpectedly went right back "into state", Nipples became fully erect, causing the TV Crew to do a tight head shot to exclude her chest.
The night it happened, I was totally unaware of this, but I had taped the Free Skate. It wasn't until two days later, when Utah Girl posted a thread about the exhibition skating (which I had completely missed) in which she posted the official Photo of the three young women standing together on the podium that I saw Sarah, and replayed the tape, looking for those indications of "Totality in the Moment" which mark outstanding levels of achievement.
I then decided to tape the Worlds where the same 'two frame before the jump' pattern appeared with Irina.
But in Salt Lake City the alert Videographers headed off a potentially embarassing moment, of which Sarah was probably unaware until much later.
Far be it from me to speculate, especially since I think this is a completely pointless thread, but it seems to me that erect nipples can poke out quite prominently even through a bra and t-shirt, especially if the shirt happens to be thin, summer-weight material. I see it all the time, especially in hot summers like the past one was.
(I just see 'em because they're there, mind you, not because I'm looking or anything...ahem)
Just lay off on the poor girl, fercryinoutloud. She didn't choose to be born to such cretinous parents, and has thus far had the sense to (mostly) keep her trap shut. Hammering her for her looks is pretty damned childish.
That boyfriend, OTOH, looks like a real winner.
Snidely
She IS wearing a Bra...just look on her shoulder for the strap. You eyes did not roam far from the target point...hehe. Actually, some females just happen to have God given nipples that are large and erect even through bras. Guess your female is without that physique but mine are still that way.... and I'm far, far from my 20's
That's not a shoulder strap. That's the seam of her T-shirt. And note the inevitable effects of gravity on mass (ahem). She's not wearing anything under that thin shirt.
Aside from the utter tackiness of her appearance, as my OB-GYN says, you shouldn't go braless when you're 20, because the effects start really showing up when you turn 40. Some of my friends who cultivated the "hippie look" in the 70s are paying the price now (thank heavens I listened to my OB-GYN!) This poor girl is already starting to sag a trifle, and she's going to look like a cover girl for National Geographic in another 15 years or so.
/cattiness off
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
