Posted on 09/11/2002 5:35:03 PM PDT by Coleus
CATHOLICS NEED NOT APPLY
The US Senate is a place where legislation goes to die. The US House of Representatives has passed over 50 pieces of legislation with overwhelming bipartisan support and the US Senate has not acted on them.
The US Senate also has the duty to give their advise and consent on Judicial nominees.
There is a Judicial Emergency in that over 20% of the Federal Bench is vacant. The backlog of cases denies justice to everyone with cases before the Federal bench. People need to have confidence in the impartiality of the Justice System as well as speed of a solution. Some of the delays exceed two years. This means that the current judges are backed up and overworked. Justice delayed is justice denied as the saying goes.
The answer is to put more judges to work on the Federal Bench.
President Bush has done his best to get the process started. He submitted his first nominees sixteen months ago, on May 9, 2001. 122 people have been nominated by the president, 72 have been confirmed 48 have not had hearings and two have been rejected.
For comparison President Clinton's first nominees were three months later on, August 6, President Bush 41 was August 4 and President Reagan was July 9.
Each of the previous presidents had 100% of their first 11 nominees confirmed.
President Bush has had two nominees rejected, three were confirmed and 6 have not yet had a hearing. After 16 months.
Every Judicial nominee must go through extensive background checks and investigations. The American Bar Association reviews a lawyers background and makes it's recommendation as well.
During the first year of Bush ll only 43% of his nominees were confirmed. The facts are that during President Clinton's first year 57% were confirmed, Bush l had 62% President Reagan had 92% confirmed.
Only 45.3% of active judges today were named by Republican Presidents. 52.9% were named by Democrat Presidents in the past twenty years. Even though President Clinton and the Democrats only held office for eight of the past twenty years.
Last weeks vote on Justice Priscilla Owens was a classic 10-9 partisan party line vote.
Justice Priscilla Owen sits on the Texas Supreme Court. She won reelection with 84% of the vote. President Bush nominated her to the 5th Circuit Court in May of 2001, sixteen months ago. She was endorsed by the thirteen previous Texas State Bar Presidents. The American Bar Association gave her their unanimous endorsement with their highest rating of "well qualified."
The Democrat controlled Judiciary Committee and even Democrat Senator Joseph Biden - a former Judiciary Committee chairman - has called for all nominees to get a floor vote, saying that everyone nominated is entitled "to have a hearing and to have a shot to be heard on the floor and have a vote on the floor." By continuing their campaign of obstructing the confirmation of qualified judges Democrats have perpetuated the judicial crisis that is threatening the administration of justice.
Georgia Democratic US Senator Zell Miller had said that he would break the 50/50 tie and vote for Justice Owen's confirmation if her nomination made it to the floor. Typically if a nominee is going to be confirmed other Democrats would follow and she would probably have received a wider margin of support. The 10 Democrats on the Judiciary committee voted against letting her nomination go to the Senate floor.
The code words of judicial temperament, qualifications, etc., are just window dressing.
The real reason Justice Owens was rejected was not because she is not qualified. She is the first and only Judicial nominee to have a "well qualified" rating from the American Bar Association and be rejected.
Justice Owens was rejected because she decided an earlier case that said that teen age girls ought to notify their parents before they have an abortion. Texas law states that any surgery, even an ear piercing must have parental consent. Only abortions are reduced to notification. A parent in Texas can be notified that their daughter is going to have an abortion and they cannot prevent it. They are only given notice. They have no legal right to intervene.
Justice Owen was deemed to be "pro-life" and therefore, unqualified to sit on the Federal bench. US Senate members want to assure that there is no "litmus test for judges" but by their own words and actions they are saying that if you are "conservative" i.e. pro-life, you will not be allowed to sit on the Federal bench.
The irony here is that Senator Leahy who switched from Republican to Democrat and Senator Kennedy, call themselves Catholic but are ardently pro-abortion. Not just in favor of allowing a woman to "choose" to kill her baby but against any reasonable restriction and in favor of taxpayer funded abortion, on demand, right up until the moment of birth.
People reading this in New Jersey should care because if a Republican wins here in November and the Republicans take control of the Senate Justice Owens will be confirmed.
Larry Cirignano, Esq.
CatholicVote.org
PO Box 70695
Washington, DC 20024
609-781-0090 cell
202-318-0789 fax
Bush wasn't MIA on Priscilla Owen but your analysis is sure the hell DOA.
The even sadder irony is that probably at least 50% of Americans who call themselves Catholics, including a significant number of clergy, are deli Catholics at best who are also pro-abortion and simply ignore Church teachings in the matter
So was she approved or not? I'm sure he will get his Saddam effort approved.
It was Jeffords who switched.
She was not approved by a Senate committee because she is pro life. To the pro abortion bigots, being in favor of parental notification for children having abortions is sacrilege.
Bush has NOT withdrawn her name and if enough of us vote Republican in the next election, Priscilla Owen will get her seat on the bench.
If you are truly upset at a committee usurping the authority of the Senate body, I would suggest your ire is misplaced.
Never is too strong of a word. Chris Dodd was told by a parish in my neck of the woods to take his donation and shove it becasue of his never ending support of abortion on demand.
Abortion is a GOP policy.
Nope, if Bush had been President when the PBA bill passed the first time, there would be tens of thousands of more American kids entering school this year. There are differences and those deifferences translate into lives Aske15.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.