Skip to comments.
Clinton leads the revolt against war (PROJECTILE VOMITING ALERT)
The Evening Standard ^
| September 6, 2002
| Joe Murphy
Posted on 09/07/2002 2:40:29 PM PDT by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: FreedomFriend
Now isn't that interessssting. If my memory serves, the sink emperor's position is identical to that of the chicoms. What a coinky-dink!
To: MeeknMing
It was only a matter of time before clinton would try undermine the current administration. If he doesn't take extreme positions, nobody pays any attention to him.
Guess Saddam has something on clinton and maybe he's being blackmailed. Hmmmmmmmmm?
To: MadIvan
Clinton was supposedly obesessed with usama bin laden,
but all this time he's really been obsessed with W.
43
posted on
09/07/2002 3:20:58 PM PDT
by
AdvisorB
To: MadIvan
Clinton was supposedly obesessed with usama bin laden,
but all this time he's really been obsessed with W.
44
posted on
09/07/2002 3:21:32 PM PDT
by
AdvisorB
To: FreedomFriend
Do you ever get the feeling that this is a public relations sound byte to get conservatives behind a military attack of Iraq? After all, if Clinton is against it, we have to be for it. Right? Sometimes I get the hunch that we're being played for suckers. Please elaborate. Are you suggesting that Clinton is making statements to get Conservatives behind the war effort? Do you have ANY idea how that sounds?
45
posted on
09/07/2002 3:22:52 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: Raymond Hendrix
he is a poor excuse for a president.You should have said ex-president. He was a poor excuse for a president.
Fortunately for us, ex-presidents have no say in gov't. Current presidents do extend some courtesies to their predecessors, but they're not required to do so.
I have a feeling that carter and clintoon are going to have a very hard time getting any phone calls returned from this WH. And that will just make them nastier.
To: justshe
MeeknMing.....we need one of your famous pings! Thanks! #36.....
| Have a cup while you FReep ! |
Or, given the time of the day.........
To: weegee
Though I dislike Clinton, that quote makes perfect sense. However, I assume that the administration, as well as Clinton, are in cohoots with one another. The goal is to get more conservatives on the side of war? Why? Support has declined, they know that the liberals will never be for it, so they have to do their best to increase the percentage for war. Thus, how do they do that? For one, you get the man who is the most villified by conservatives. On the domestic front, who would this be? Bingo: Bill Clinton. Then, you get Clinton to speak in opposition to war in an effort to get all conservatives disgusted so that they will support war.
Thus, this is the reasoning. While this is projecting and not grounded in stone, it seems this is what is going on.
While Clinton is anti-American to you and I, and though I agree with it completely, he was simply used to degenerate the white house, deplore morals, as well as contribute to an ever-increasing globalist front. This is exactly what is going on today, and W appears to be leading the way in a "Globalist" coaltion to "bring the world together" for "peace". It's about the makings of a world government, and Saddam represents a threat to them. However, this is all speculation. Flame-Away.
Comment #49 Removed by Moderator
To: MadIvan
50
posted on
09/07/2002 3:34:17 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: MadIvan
And in the States, former president Bill Clinton led a growing chorus of demands to postpone action until Osama bin Laden, the terrorist godfather thought to be behind the 11 September atrocities, is caught. What if OBL is dead?
klinton is a traitor to this country, as well as jimmy carter is.
To: Raymond Hendrix
clinton is not a wise man Maybe so, but he is definitely a clever evil boy. Consider this: Clinton allowed 9.11 to happen by not taking bin ladden out, when he had serveral oppoertunities to do so. He did the same thing for saddam, he allowed this madman to kick the UN inspectors out of iraq, thus the present crises. Because he(clinton) failed to defend this country(clinton's prime directive as President), he wants Bush to do the same(to allow another 9.11, or worst to happen). Then clinton can claim that he is not the only one to fail protecting America from terrorists attack. Consequently then, his legacy(It's all about him) will not look so bad. This is how an evil 5 year old mind works. You see most 5 year-olds can not see anything beyond themselves, they are extremely selfish, and will do anything for self gratification, even at the expense of thousands of American lives.
To: MadIvan
Ivan, we Americans thank you Brits for your backbone, and standing beside us on this. Friends do this.
BC does NOT speak for America; nor for me.
If we have to go it alone, so be it. Frankly, I'd prefer it.
To: Mich
I don't know about oil fields, though I have heard that. Check out #48 and tell me whether this is a possiblility?
I have also wondered why concern all of a sudden shifted to Iraq. To me, it's like there was no word of him, and now it is 24-7.
To: FreedomFriend
Your analysis is quite interesting. I thought it was just Ahab speaking what Jezebel told him to speak (as usual).
To: floriduh voter
It was only a matter of time before clinton would try undermine the current administration. If he doesn't take extreme positions, nobody pays any attention to him. Guess Saddam has something on clinton and maybe he's being blackmailed. Hmmmmmmmmm?
I imagine he's just building upon his Legacy.......
The Legacy..........
To: MadIvan
"Clinton leads the revolt against war (PROJECTILE VOMITING ALERT)" Does anyone really expect Clinton to support America? I mean, the guy is just showing his true colors.
BTW, will America attack Iraq if Saddam should demonstrate to the world that he has nukes by openly testing one?
57
posted on
09/07/2002 3:41:49 PM PDT
by
StormEye
To: TrueBeliever9; justshe; floriduh voter
More Legacy..........
i got away wif murder, rape and
obstruction ov justice. . .
i so proud o' myself! !
JESSE JACKSON and his mistress Karin Stanford (circled)
pose with Clinton and other Rainbow Coalition staffers on
December 3, 1998 -- five months before Jesse's love child
was born.
"A presidential executive order issued during the Clinton
administration hamstrung the FBI so badly that bureau
lawyers decided it would be illegal to infiltrate Osama bin
Laden's terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, a senior
FBI official during the Clinton administration said Saturday."
(June 1, 2002)
____________________
"I don't believe 9-11 happened because of an intelligence breach," Quayle told Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes."
"I think it was really a policy breach. It was the inaction of the previous administration, by and large, that al Qaeda -- and bin Laden in particular -- thought that they could hit the United States, and there would be a retaliation maybe of a cruise missile but nothing more than that," he explained.
The comments make the former vice president, who served under President Bush's father from 1989 to 1993, the highest ranking former U.S. official to suggest that the Clinton administration should get the lion's share of the blame for not preventing the 9-11 attacks.
To: MadIvan
I agree, wholeheartely with you. He has been selling America down the tubes since he sold out to the Chinese when he occupied the Governor's mansion in Arkansas. He is a true traitor and we have the DNC promoting him and his agenda, plus we have sheeple who by their very name, do not think, read or analyze the printed or spoken word.
59
posted on
09/07/2002 3:41:57 PM PDT
by
tillacum
To: justshe
Your inclusion of Jimmmy "I'll never lie to ya" Carter is incorrect. If you study the history you'll realize that all of this is JC's fault. His failure to support our friend the Shah of Iran led to a power vacuum that the Soviets then filled in Afghanistan, which created UBL.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
