[The Man]

The author of this article has no idea what he is talking about.

If the Supreme Court does reverse Roe v. Wade totally as it should (it has already reversed it in part), the most likely outcome will be that the decision to outlaw or not outlaw abortion will fall back to the states, which is where it was and constitutionally should be in the first place.

All you have to do is listen to the statements of the various anti-Roe Justices on the Supreme Court right now to know this.

[NukeMan]

A little off-topic here, but this again illustrates why it is important to regard certain rights as 'inalienable' (God-given). If government can grant rights it can also take them away.

[John O]

If the Supreme Court does reverse Roe v. Wade totally as it should (it has already reversed it in part), the most likely outcome will be that the decision to outlaw or not outlaw abortion will fall back to the states, which is where it was and constitutionally should be in the first place.

It very much depends on how they do it. If they recognize officially that life begins at conception then abortion will be legally defined as murder in all US states and territories. End of abortion.

God Save America (Please)

[Sacajaweau]

Reversing Roe vs Wade:

I think the Supreme Court can conclude that the Constitution did in no way intend to give women the FREEDOM to Kill their unborn child and make it binding throughout the land.

The penalty for engaging in such an act would fall to each State.

The Men who created the Constitution never dreamed that the "gentle sex" would become murderers of their own flesh and blood.Murder is always wrong except in self-defense.

Sac

[Right To Life]

If the Supreme Court does reverse Roe v. Wade totally as it should (it has already reversed it in part)

On what do you base the parenthetical contention reprised above?