Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beating around the Bush.
Cape Cod Times ^ | SEAN GONSALVES

Posted on 08/26/2002 7:34:49 AM PDT by doubtingthomas2



Home news | arts | sports | biz | weather | classifieds

Sean Gonsalves  

Columnists

Sean Gonsalves
Appears Tuesdays


Lawrence Brown
Every Friday


Francis Broadhurst
Every other Thursday


Letters
Today's letters to the Cape Cod Times
--------------------
Send a letter to the Cape Cod Times

Related
Editorial Page Editor:
William Mills
--------------------


Beating around the Bush

By SEAN GONSALVES
I consider myself an aspiring devotee of what Gandhi termed satyagraha (truth-force), which in pop politics is described with ambiguous phrases like "passive resistance" and "civil disobedience."

Call it what you want. I have no ideas for a better word to describe the "experiment in truth" conducted by Gandhi - a truth Gandhi himself believed was most powerfully present in Jesus, President Bush's favorite political philosopher.

But I'm not a pacifist - an admission that seems to confuse a good number of intelligent people. Gandhi himself said: "manslaughter may be necessary in certain cases. Suppose a man runs amok and goes furiously about, sword in hand, and killing anyone that comes in his way, and no one dares to capture him alive. Anyone who dispatches this lunatic will earn the gratitude of the community and be regarded as a benevolent man."

It's been said nonviolent tactics are hopelessly naive because the adherents will be crushed by their enemies and many innocent people would die. If that were skeptics' true concern, then why not apply the same logic to war, which in the 20th century - the bloodiest century in human history - anywhere from 80 to 90 percent of all war casualties were non-combatants?

Some will say nonviolent action works with democracies but not against dictators. Well, they'll have a hard time explaining how in 1944 dictatorships in Nicaragua and Guatemala fell in a matter of days by way of Gandhian methods. So I still hope against hope that "regime change" in Iraq can be brought about through nonviolent means.

Of course, it may come down to war. And if it does, we should at least be telling ourselves the truth. Even my 12-year-old daughter can see through the simplistic good-vs.-evil analysis. So let's stop beating around the Bush and at least have a candid discussion before we allow privileged men sitting in plush, air-conditioned offices to send other people's sons and daughters off to mortal combat.

Shouldn't we be having a vigorous debate about the oil politics fueling this conflict? After all, the five permanent member of the United Nations Security Council are all scrambling for economic control of Iraq's oil reserves.

Read the industry mags and you'll quickly learn that Iraq possesses the second largest oil reserves on the planet, currently estimated at 112.5 billion barrels, or about 11 percent of the world total.

Many experts believe that Iraq has more undiscovered reserves that could double its total petro production once vigorous prospecting resumes, putting Iraq up there with Saudi Arabia as one of the world's most profitable oil sources, according to industry experts. Oil companies are drooling at the prospect. One industry insider called it "a boom waiting to happen."

There's also the fact that there are five companies that dominate the global oil industry. In order of size the firms are: Exxon-Mobil, Royal Dutch-Shell, British Petroleum-Amoco, Chevron-Texaco, and TotalElfFina.

A recent report assembled by political scientists and church officials points out: "US-based Exxon Mobil looms largest among the world's oil companies and by some yardsticks measures as the world's biggest company. The United States consequently ranks first in the corporate oil sector, with the UK second and France trailing as a distant third. Considering that the US and the UK act almost alone as (Iraq) sanctions advocates and enforcers, and that they are the headquarters of the world's four largest oil companies, we cannot ignore the possible relationship of (military) policy with this powerful corporate interest."

And let's not forget that US and UK companies had a three-quarter share in Iraq's oil production before the 1972 nationalization of the Iraq Petroleum Company, when the Iraqi government began to make steps to gain greater control of its oil resources.

In a 1998 speech at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco, Chevron CEO Kenneth T. Derr candidly remarked: "Iraq possesses huge reserves of oil and gas - reserves I'd love Chevron to have access to." He then went on to voice his support for the current sanctions regime.

Condoleeza Rice, perhaps the president's most influential national security advisor, was a board member of Chevron before going to work in the White House. Chevron even named one of its supertankers in her honor.

Now, anyone acquainted with the history of Middle East oil politics knows that U.S policymakers' interest in dominating the world oil industry goes back to when Rice was a mere twinkle in her father's eye.

But given all this corporate scandal stuff and the close ties that the Bush administration has with big oil, don't you think we owe it to ourselves, and especially to the young men and women in our armed services, to thoroughly investigate this stuff?

To date, Congress and the "liberal" media have, unfortunately, generated more heat than light on this story behind the story.

Sean Gonsalves is a Cape Cod Times staff writer and a syndicated columnist. His column runs on Tuesdays. Call him at 508-775-1200, ext. 719, or e-mail him at sgonsalves@capecodonline.com.

______________________________________________

Back to Editorials
Contacts: news@capecodonline.com | advertising@capecodonline.com
cape cod online | capeweek | primetime | on cape | cape cod times | classifieds

Copyright © 2002 Cape Cod Times. All rights reserved.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: evilopeckerprinces; exportingterrorism; fatah; fatahiscrap; fundingalqaeda; gazafirstdisaster; hamas; hamasiscrap; hebrewuniversity; iraq; islamakazis; islamakaziwahhabi; islampeace; israel; jehovahswitnesses; jihadiscrap; kickasstakegas; liberalpolicitians; medievalmonarchy; middleeast; money; muslimworldleague; oil; opecequalterrorism; opeckerislamakazis; opeckerprinces; opecoilterrorism; opecterrorexport; osamabindead; oslodelusionkills; palestinian; palestinians; philippines; radicalislam; radicalislamakazis; saudi; saudiarabia; saudideathcults; saudienemies; saudiislamakazis; saudisequalnazis; saudispayhamas; saudispushterror; september11; stabintheback; sueopeckerprinces; terror; terrorism; wahhabideathcult; wahhabiislamakazis; westbank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Grampa Dave
Amen. Again, here is the hole (one of many) in the liberal argument: No blood for oil, but we don't want to ruin pristine ANWAR... you can't have it both ways. All whine, no solutions.
21 posted on 08/26/2002 8:36:19 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; dighton; Orual; general_re
Perhaps the title should read "Rich, multi-national oil companies conspire to drive price of oil into the ground."

... and provide enough foreign source energy so that Cape Cod doesn't need to build a windmill farm and all the Greenies will live happily ever after.

22 posted on 08/26/2002 8:40:41 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doubtingthomas2
Even the pro-Iraq former UN Inspector Scott Ritter has dismissed the oil theory...

Ritter dismissed oil as a motivating factor behind our coming war with Iraq. He made a good defense of this claim. Yes, Iraq has the second-largest oil reserves on earth, a juicy target for the petroleum-loving Bush administration. But the U.S. already buys some 68% of all the oil produced in Iraq. "The Navy ships in the Gulf who work to interdict the smuggling of Iraqi oil," said Ritter, "are fueled by Iraqi oil." Iraq's Oil Minister has stated on camera that if the sanctions are lifted, Iraq will do whatever it takes to see that America's oil needs are fulfilled. "You can't get a better deal than that," claimed Ritter.

Source

23 posted on 08/26/2002 8:45:52 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad; hellinahandcart
We should all be so lucky to have to suffer through such small problems in life.

Reg Hubley (37th from left) in Hell.

24 posted on 08/26/2002 9:51:22 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson