Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bolshevik Canard
The Holocaust History Project.com ^ | July 28, 2000 | Richard J. Green

Posted on 08/18/2002 7:02:29 AM PDT by iav2

The Bolshevik Canard

An essay by Richard J. Green

Holocaust deniers and Nazi-apologists often make some very revealing claims regarding Jews, Bolshevism, and Stalinism. They often claim that Bolshevism was a Jewish movement that resulted in mass murder of Christians on a scale much larger than the Final Solution. The implication is that even though the Holocaust did not happen, the Jews deserved it and/or the fact that Stalinists committed mass murder somehow diminishes the fact that the Nazis and their accomplices committed mass murder. Even if the Holocaust-deniers and Nazi-apologists had their facts straight, one would have to wonder at their reasoning. How does the supposed fact that some Jews committed mass murder justify mass murder of Jews? Notwithstanding, this absurd and inhumane implication we must, as usual call into question the supposed facts.

The Crimes of Stalinism

The crimes of Stalinism are not to be underestimated. That the Stalinist regime committed crimes of unprecedented magnitude and inhumanity is beyond reasonable debate. The forced collectivizations in Kazakhstan, Soviet Central Asia, and, of course the Ukraine 1 took a horrendous toll:

The Great Famine of 1932-33 in which 5-10 million lives were lost, was caused in large measure by the chaos of collectivization. Although agricultural production declined in the 1930s, the export of grain increased. Robert Tucker calls forced collectivization a "state-initiated, state-directed, and state-enforced revolution from above."

The brutality of the Stalinist regime is incontrovertible. The Jewish origin of this brutality, on the other hand is a mendacious claim.

Was Bolshevism a Jewish movement?

In a post to the Usenet group alt.revisionism, Jacob Minsky 4 demonstrates in no uncertain terms the absurdity of such a position. First, he quotes Pipes:

The census of the Communist Party conducted in 1922 showed that only 959 Jewish members joined before 1917.

Minsky then poses the following question to his Nazi-apologist interlocutor:

Why was the Jewish Labor Bund one of only two political parties (the other one was the small and heavily Jewish PSR, a democratic socialist party) to unequivocally condemn in the Congress of Deputies the Bolshevik seizure of power?

The typical response of the antisemite is to pick out a few prominent Bolsheviks and claim without evidence that they were Jewish. That Trotsky was a Jew is true, but antisemites forget to note that he was one of the early and strongest critics of Stalin and that this criticism cost him his life. Perhaps, a few of the fewer than 1000 Jews who were early members of the Party were indeed in leadership positions, but as Aristotle assures us, "One swallow does not a summer make."

Of course, it is ridiculous to blame a single ethnicity for the crimes of the Bolsheviks. The fact that Stalin was a Georgian does not make all Georgians responsible for the crimes of Stalinism. Some may argue that it is just as unreasonable to blame all Germans for the crimes of the Nazis. This point is valid: guilt should be assigned individually not collectively. Only those Germans who knew about, or should have known about, the Final Solution, participated in its execution, or did nothing to stop it when they could have done so, bear blame for these crimes. Needless to say, young Germans born after the war can only be blameless.

Antisemites blame Jews for Bolshevism by use of a few half-truths. By this method, it could be shown that it was, in fact, Germans who are responsible for Bolshevism. It is perhaps just as (un)reasonable to blame Germans for the rise of Bolshevism as it is to blame Jews. Marx, after all, was a German atheist. Additionally, the political leader of Germany at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution was one of the Bolsheviks greatest sponsors.

German Kaiser sponsors Bolshevism

Martin Gilbert has the following to say about the German government's support of Bolshevism:

The Bolsheviks had not expected the Austrian and German Governments to be sympathetic to their revolutionary cause, but policy-makers in both Berlin and Vienna were eager to support the spread of Bolshevism in the hope, not all that far fetched, that the Bolsheviks would undermine stable government in Russia and destroy the warmaking powers of the Tsar. On January 7 [1915-RJG] a Bolshevik group in Petrograd distributed leaflets to soldiers, workers, and peasants, calling on them not to pay their monthly rents.

That same day in Constantinople, a wealthy Bolshevik Alexander Helphand, approached the German Ambassador to Turkey with the words: 'The interests of the German Government are identical with those of the Russian revolutionaries.' ... Helphand's conversation marked the start of a growing German interest in stimulating revolution in Russia: an interest that was to be intensified by the stalemate on the battlefield, and to find its culmination in facilitating the return of Lenin to Russia, across German soil. Within three months the German government gave money to an Estonian intermediary to give to Lenin, to encourage him to pursue his anti-war activities. In fact, he needed no encouragement.

Gilbert adds a footnote:

The sum paid over to Lenin was between 200, 000 and 250, 000 Marks, worth at that time between $50, 000 and $62, 000 dollars. When the Bolsheviks came to pay it back in 1923, the inflation of the Mark was such that it was worth less than $1.

Will our antisemitic "friends" blame the Germans for the origins of Bolshevism as readily as they blame the Jews? To blame either group would, in my view, be ludicrous. I mean only to point out the hypocrisy of our "friends" who will no doubt continue to blame the Jews for the Bolshevik Revolution as well as capitalist exploitation, the ozone hole and the heat death of the universe.

Stalin Targets the Jews.

In examining the question of whether Stalin was a Jew exterminating Christians, it might be relevent to examine how he treated Jews.

In our context, developments in the Soviet Union, especially after 1948 -the year of Zhdanov's mysterious death and the "Leningrad affair"- are of greater importance. For the first time after the Great Purge, Stalin had a great number of high and highest officials executed, and we know for certain that this was planned as the beginning of another nationwide purge.

This would have been touched off by the "Doctor's plot" had Stalin's death not intervened. A group of mostly Jewish physicians were accused of having plotted "to wipe out the leading cadres of the USSR." 30 ...Moreover, the very content of the absurd accusation against the physicians, that they would kill off people in leading positions all over the country, must have filled with fearful forebodings all those who were acquainted with Stalin's method of accusing a fictitious enemy of the crime he himself was about to commit. (The best known example is of course his accusation that Tukhachevski conspired with Germany at the very moment when Stalin was contemplating an alliance with the Nazis.) ...

The most dramatic new element in this last purge, which Stalin planned in the last years of his life, was a decisive shift in ideology, the introduction of a Jewish world conspiracy. For years, the ground for this change had been carefully laid in a number of trials in the satellite countries -the Rajk trial in Hungary, the Ana Pauker affair in Rumania, and, in 1952, the Slansky trial in Czechoslovakia. In these preparatory measures, high party officials were singled out because of their "Jewish bourgeois" origins and accused of Zionism; this accusation was gradually changed to implicate notoriously non-Zionist agencies (especially the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee), in order to indicate that all Jews were Zionists, and all Zionist groups "hirelings of American Imperialism."

There was of course nothing new in the "crime" of Zionism, but as the campaign progressed and began to center on Jews in the Soviet Union, another significant change took place: Jews now stood accused of "cosmopolitanism" rather than Zionism, and the pattern of accusations that developed out of this slogan followed ever more closely the Nazi pattern of a Jewish world conspiracy in the sense of the Elders of Zion.

It now became startlingly clear how deep an impression this mainstay of Nazi ideology must have made on Stalin -the first indications of this had been in evidence ever since the Hitler-Stalin pact- partly, to be sure, because of its obvious propaganda value in Russia as in all of the satellite countries, where anti-Jewish feeling was widespread and anti-Jewish propaganda had always enjoyed great popularity, but partly also because this type of a fictitious world conspiracy provided an ideologically more suitable background for totalitarian claims to world rule than Wall Street, capitalism, and imperialism.

The open, unashamed adoption of what had become to the whole world the most prominent sign of Nazism was the last compliment Stalin paid to his late colleague and rival in total domination with whom, much to his chagrin, he had not been able to come to a lasting agreement.

Thus, it is clear that not only is the claim that Bolshevism was a Jewish plot to commit genocide against Christians a canard, but the number one culprit of Soviet mass murder was himself an antisemite and might have tried to finish what our Nazi-apologists' hero started, viz.the total annihilation of the Jewish people in Europe.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy; Russia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2002 7:02:29 AM PDT by iav2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iav2
Bump
2 posted on 08/18/2002 7:16:45 AM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tictoc
This is the problem with the idea of group responsibility. A large number of the leaders of the bolsevites were of Jewish origin, but a great number of them may have been self hating jewish anti-semites. They were certainly atheists.

Anti-semite is itself a silly term. Palestinians are semites. Anti-jew would be more accurate.

3 posted on 08/18/2002 8:19:49 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iav2
Stalin's wife was Jewish and she had alone had the courage, after visiting the Ukraine and seeing her husband's mass murders and forced starvation of eight millions, to denounce his policies before the Central Committee when she returned to Moscow. Her reward was that night to "commit suicide" that evening by "throwing herself down the stairs".
4 posted on 08/18/2002 8:33:25 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iav2; monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
ping
5 posted on 08/18/2002 8:52:23 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
That Bloody Century Pass'd- "We have nothing to fear but Governments Themselves..."
6 posted on 08/18/2002 8:56:50 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
A large number of the leaders of the bolsevites were of Jewish origin, but a great number of them may have been self hating jewish anti-semites. They were certainly atheists.

"A great number of them may have been"? Every single last one of them absolutely was! The Jewish Bolsheviks formed the "Yevsektzia" ("Jewish Section") of the NKVD which was dedicated to hunting down and exterminating Rabbis and Jewish religious leaders.

7 posted on 08/18/2002 9:01:06 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Is Bolshevik Canard similar to Muskovy Duck?
8 posted on 08/18/2002 9:06:28 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Richard J. Green is a revisionist historian. His article is misleading, emotional gibberish. A sane(and very long) view by Antony C. Sutton is here:

WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION

Limo Liberals are nothing new.

9 posted on 08/18/2002 9:29:37 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Richard J. Green is a revisionist historian.

What part of my previous post #7 is revisionist?

10 posted on 08/18/2002 9:32:03 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Richard J. Green is a revisionist historian.

LOL.

Limo Liberals are nothing new.

True but your buddy McKinney is not a "limo liberal" she's far worse.

11 posted on 08/18/2002 11:07:27 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alouette; LarryLied; dennisw
Mr. Lied's source appears to be of the conspiracy freak type.

His book on the evil Skull And Bones Society at Yale. America's Secret Establishment

12 posted on 08/18/2002 11:14:05 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
None. Richard J. Green is the revisionist, selective historian. He is on the same page as Cornell West and his entourage. Trash talk.

One example of Green's nonsense:

" policy-makers in both Berlin and Vienna were eager to support the spread of Bolshevism . . ."

A factually true statement. But it leaves out one itsy-bitsy detail which negates Green's entire argument. Russian Jews, in large numbers, supported Germany against Russia in WWI.

That support was so dangerous to Russia that the military ordered Jews out of border areas. A bad move on the part of the Tsar because radicals were then able to move into large cities all over the empire and incite revolution.

Did you check out my link in #9? Antony C. Sutton agrees with Green's contention that the Russian Revolution was not a Jewish conspiracy. But Sutton does so with hard facts, not with breathless rants about antisemites and distorted history.

13 posted on 08/18/2002 11:51:38 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: veronica; Phil V.; DBtoo; JMJ333; Hornetsrule
Mr. Lied's source appears to be of the conspiracy freak type.

Didn't even bother to read my link, did you?

Knew you wouldn't, that is why I posted it.

The book I linked to agrees with Green that the Russian Revolution was not Jewish conspiracy.

This is tooooo easy.

14 posted on 08/18/2002 11:58:00 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
But what about the Skull And Bones Society??

(;

You are right. This is toooo easy Mr. Lied. (PS. I already know the Russian Revolution was not Jewish conspiracy.)

15 posted on 08/18/2002 1:14:19 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: iav2
...Like the nuns used to tell us...
There's good and bad in any group of humans you sub-divide.
Good Jews are a blessing to mankind.
Bad Jews are a curse on humanity.

Kind of like plumbers...
16 posted on 08/18/2002 1:16:15 PM PDT by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied; veronica; DBtoo; JMJ333; Hornetsrule
The Great Famine of 1932-33 in which 5-10 million lives were lost, was caused in large measure by the chaos of collectivization. Although agricultural production declined in the 1930s, the export of grain increased.

Have you ever read "Merchants of Grain"?
The FACT that grain was EXPORTED from a famine area is . . . uh . . . "interesting".


Here are a couple of pages . . .


17 posted on 08/18/2002 1:47:11 PM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Reparations time. Those malefactors of great grain in Odessa were the ones who introduced the Russian Thistle, commonly known as "tumbleweed",to America.
18 posted on 08/18/2002 2:10:49 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
little known phact . . .

THE patriarch of all FIVE grain trading companies was a dude named Gomerstein. Ol' Gomer had poor eyes and was unfit to be a purveyor of diamonds, gold silver and jewelry in general. Plus Gomer did not have knack fur banking. He wuz pretty much not the "sharpest knife in the drawer". . . pretty much an outcast . . . consigned to th' boondocks. Then he met this phertile pharm gurl, Eva, an' th' rest is history.

19 posted on 08/18/2002 2:23:08 PM PDT by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Gomerstein only brings up one google hit. You trying to distract attention from the tumbleweed angle?

Follow me here. In 1877, Russian Thistle, AKA tumbleweed, shows up in a grain shipment from the Ukraine. By the early 1900s, it has spread to every western state. Just in time for Hollywood movies. Meanwhile, Edison is sitting in his New Jersey studio going nowhere with the industry he created. People want Westerns, Westerns with tumbleweeds in them, not Lillian Gish on an ice floe in New Hampshire. See the connections?

20 posted on 08/18/2002 2:51:10 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson