Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware the Neocons
Front Page Magazine ^ | August 13, 2K2 | David Harsanyi

Posted on 08/13/2002 6:51:09 AM PDT by rdb3

Beware the Neocons
By David Harsanyi
FrontPageMagazine.com | August 13, 2002


As war with Iraq becomes an inescapable reality, a "peace-loving" contingent of pundits have momentarily transferred their assault from the phantom Religious Right to a new, more sinister group, calling themselves neoconservatives.

Forget 50 years of neoconservative political, social and economic thought; forget Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz and Nathan Glazer; forget Ronald Reagan whose neocon-influenced foreign policy won the Cold War. From now on, just think of them as warmongers. Stereotyping can be a complicated business, but anti-war pundits have mastered its intricacies, distilling intellectual movements into trouble-free critique: neoconservatives are duplicitous right wingers, prodding the United States towards war to a.) advance our colonial gains b.) facilitate the racist Israeli government’s subjugation of defenseless Arabs and c.) wag the dog for oil fetishists George Bush and Richard Cheney.

Joseph Sobran has described neocons as "former liberals, mostly pro-Israel and anti-Communist Jewish intellectuals." Irving Kristol, the "godfather" of neoconservatism, more appropriately described one as "a liberal who has been mugged by reality." But these days, it seems that even temperate support for military action against dictators and terrorists qualifies you a neocon.

Chris Matthews, of MSNBC’s "Hardball", a former White House aide and speechwriter for the foreign policy-challenged President Jimmy Carter, spearheaded the recent attack from his San Francisco Chronicle column, writing that a "regime change" in Iraq was "demanded by neoconservative policy wonks and backed by oil-patchers George W. Bush and Dick Cheney."

"What I fear is the neoconservatives," Matthews told an audience at Brown University. "They want to fight the North Koreans again. Iran. Iraq. Syria. Libya." Before long, "they’ll go after China." Matthews, who forgot to mention Saudi Arabia, Sudan and France, exposes what sounds like a Jewish conspiracy, facilitated by Republican oilmen. The TV host conveniently failed to mention that every poll shows that a majority of Americans support military action against Iraq.

Matthews, by the way, is not shy about outing the main culprits: Bill Kristol (Weekly Standard), Robert Kagan (Washington Post), "neo-conservative" Frank Gaffney Jr., William Safire (New York Times), David Frum, (a "neo-conservative Canadian"), Joseph Shattan ("a like-minded ideologue"), Paul Wolfowitz ("leads the neo-conservative forces at the Pentagon") and Richard Perle ("neo-conservative high priest") are the main culprits in the scheme.

Progressive pundit Joshua Micah Marshall furthers the neocon conspiracy theory. Marshall, whose remarkable ability to sinuously avoid facts while clearing up why the right’s successful track record in foreign policy has more to do with luck than intelligence, wrote an informative article in the June issue of Washington Monthly called "Bomb Saddam? How the obsession of a few neocon hawks became the central goal of U.S. foreign policy."

A FOX News national poll conducted in May, when we assume Marshall was writing his piece, showed that over 70 percent of Americans supported U.S. military action to remove Saddam Hussein. Did a mere handful of neocon hawks — a redundant phrase, no doubt — organized by Richard Perle persuade mainstream America, as well as the administration, that Hussein’s regime poses a threat to the Middle East, to the world and thus, to us?

The neocon-obsessed Marshall refers to Perle as the "the portly, Ronald Reagan-era assistant secretary of defense who kept the defense-hawk home fires burning throughout the Bill Clinton years from a perch at the American Enterprise Institute." Clinton might have taken some of his advice, perhaps none of this bellicosity would be necessary. Nevertheless, the slim Marshall points out, in case you missed it or cared, that Perle is "Jewish, passionately pro-Israel and pro-Likud." The importance of those traits can be easily deduced.

The Washington Post's Dana Milbank, author of the Bush-bashing book Smashmouth, called Perle the "intellectual guru of the hard-line neoconservative movement in foreign policy." (America fruitlessly awaits Milbank’s piece on the "hard-line progressive movement.") When writing about the Bush appointment of Joseph Shattan, who vigorously opposed the President’s stand on a future Palestinian state, as speechwriter, Milbank wondered aloud how the neocon had ever gotten the job in this Republican administration. "How did it happen? Sounds like the work of the Kristol cabal, a vast, neoconservative conspiracy centered on William Kristol, publisher of the Weekly Standard magazine." (For the record, according to their web site, the Weekly Standard’s evil reaches only 60,000 brainwashed neocons a week, while Milbank’s Washington Post sells 786,032 daily.)

Also chiming in, early and often, about the neoconservative threat was Lenora Fulani’s former presidential running mate Patrick Buchanan. The crabby isolationist also blames neocons and Jews: "The war (Benjamin) Netanyahu and the neocons want, with the United States and Israel fighting all of the radical Islamic states, is the war bin Laden wants, the war his murderers hoped to ignite when they sent those airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon." In another column, Buchanan repeats these attacks almost verbatim, inserting Israel’s latest prime minister for Netanyahu, writing that Bush is a slave to "(Ariel) Sharon and the neoconservative War Party." Israel has never once asked a single US soldier to die for her. Our enemies, and Buchanan’s friends, the Saudis, had no problem soliciting lives when Hussein last mobilized against his neighbors.

Khidir Hamza, neither a Jew nor a neocon, but once head of Iraq's nuclear-weapons development, recently stated, "what we are talking about here really is a preemptive strike for a possible future danger which is much larger than we have right now." Hamza testified that credible German intelligence indicates Iraq already has enough uranium for three nuclear weapons by 2005. The CIA believes Hussein possess 2,650 gallons of anthrax. This is surely not enough evidence for the suicidal, pacifist faction. The anti-war crowd needs a casus belli, a picture of Mohammad Atta and Saddam Hussein toasting champagne in front of the Twin Towers floor plan. Anything less would be inconclusive evidence.

A Senate resolution passed Sept. 14 authorizes the president "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided" in the attack on 9-11. Recently, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told a news conference that Iraq had "a relationship" with Al Qaeda, and Americans have no reason to doubt him. Hussein’s actions have proven that if not stopped, he will use chemical, biological and nuclear warfare to push the Middle East into a ghastly war. A majority of Americans believe action is a must against Hussein, not because they’ve been tricked by crafty necons, but because they have a lot more common sense than the elitist pundits give them credit for.


David Harsanyi is an NYC-based writer. Visit his website (http://dharsanyi.blogspot.com/) or email him at david_harsanyi@yahoo.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antiwar; neocons; stereotyping; war; waronterrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
Yes, beware of us li'l ol' neos.
1 posted on 08/13/2002 6:51:09 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
ping

alt

2 posted on 08/13/2002 6:55:27 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Yes, beware of us li'l ol' neos.

Funny, you don't *look* Jewish........;-)

3 posted on 08/13/2002 7:03:28 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Yeah. And I ain't "li'l," either.
4 posted on 08/13/2002 7:11:26 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I consider myself a neo-conservative. I was a former liberal, yes, but last December 25, I was in church, celebrating Christmas.

Although once, I DID wear a beanie cap with a propeller on top, does that make me Jewish? (or just a geek...)

5 posted on 08/13/2002 7:12:19 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
THE NEO-CONS ARE COMING! THE NEO-CONS ARE COMING!
Raise the drawbridge, lower the porcullus, prepare the boiling oil!
I'm going to go hide back in the 18th century.
6 posted on 08/13/2002 7:19:55 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Darth Sidious
Y'know, if Matthews is correct about who the neo-cons want to fight, then where do I sign up to become one?

Bring `em on, I'd prefer a straight fight to all this sneakin' around.
7 posted on 08/13/2002 7:24:34 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
What I fear is the neoconservatives," Matthews told an audience at Brown University. "They want to fight the North Koreans again. Iran. Iraq. Syria. Libya." Before long, "they’ll go after China." Matthews, who forgot to mention Saudi Arabia, Sudan and France, exposes what sounds like a Jewish conspiracy, facilitated by Republican oilmen. The TV host conveniently failed to mention that every poll shows that a majority of Americans support military action against Iraq.

Ahh, Matthews once again showing his true "Neville Chamberlain" stripes. Chrissy never realized that the axiom that "evil has to do in order to triumph is for good men to do nothing" is true and its people like him who this quote is referring to. I remember the ludicrous predictions and hysteria Matthews was spewing right after 911 and how we would never take Afghanistan.

8 posted on 08/13/2002 7:32:36 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Naa... You're just a geek.
9 posted on 08/13/2002 7:37:23 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator; Poohbah
Who else is on the list?

I'd like to add Cuba. Liberate it, annex it. :)
10 posted on 08/13/2002 7:39:37 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Chrissie the sissie, switching from the rant that Papa Bush didn't get Saddam Hussein, to how dare we want to get Saddam Hussein. With just a touch of anti-semitism thrown in for good measure.
11 posted on 08/13/2002 7:45:53 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"Also chiming in, early and often, about the neoconservative threat was Lenora Fulani’s former presidential running mate Patrick Buchanan. "

Obviously this is just more Goebbel's big lie plus guilt by association smears by those that oppose Pat's America only (non-neocon) viewpoint. Pat's running mate was Mrs. Foster, a strong conservative. Look at the article with a suspicious eye.

12 posted on 08/13/2002 7:49:35 AM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Not only Cuba, but I say we give Otto Reich another shot at the title in Venezuela since Chavez actually is still in office.
13 posted on 08/13/2002 7:57:23 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook; rdb3
When, then, do we take a stand aginst some of these evil regimes?

Better to fight them sooner rather than later. Aggression is not like wine - it gets worse the longer it is allowed to ferment. We need to stop them NOW, no compromises with any of them. Nothing short of absolute victory is acceptable.
14 posted on 08/13/2002 7:58:08 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

"Yes, YOU TOO can be a Neocon, order NOW!"

15 posted on 08/13/2002 7:58:51 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Reich's from Cuba, actually.

But yes, Venezuela might be a place we will need to annex. Certainly, if the Castro/Chavez-type wins in Brazil, we will need to think of something there, too...
16 posted on 08/13/2002 8:00:24 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
LOL!! Yes, what IS a neocon? Don't worry I know your definition from the other thread and I fully agree with it. Words do mean something and the definition is correct. However I would say that it seems that some liberals do use the word incorrectly in labeling the 'fringe' of the party
17 posted on 08/13/2002 8:08:56 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
That is exactly right. In fact, almost every single liberal in American politics has done the same thing. For example, I remember Maddy Albright criticizing the former Bush administration numerous times for NOT removing Saddam - yet there are countless pieces of evidence on tape of her making speeches in 1991 saying that the US should not remove Saddam.
18 posted on 08/13/2002 8:17:29 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Look at the article with a suspicious eye.

The author of the piece must have confused Fullani with Foster. At any rate, Fullani DID support Buchanan. And he accepted her support, even though she is an admitted Black Nationalist and Marxist.

That makes me look at Buchanan and his supporters with "a suspicious eye."

19 posted on 08/13/2002 8:19:29 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
I can't place that over my braids. It would be... ugly.
20 posted on 08/13/2002 8:20:34 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson