Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sustainable Development Called Security Imperative (Powell)
Environmental News Service ^ | 08/06/2002

Posted on 08/07/2002 9:27:49 AM PDT by cogitator

Sustainable Development Called Security Imperative

WASHINGTON, DC, August 6, 2002 (ENS) - Sustainable development is a security imperative, writes Secretary of State Colin Powell in a special publication of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

UNEP will publish a special edition of its magazine, "Our Planet," to coincide with the upcoming World Summit for Sustainable Development, containing articles on environmental issues by a variety of international leaders, including Powell.

In his article, Powell describes sustainable development as a "compelling moral and humanitarian issue" and says that delivering environmentally friendly development is vital for delivering a more stable world.

"Poverty, environmental degradation and despair are destroyers of people, of societies, of nations. This unholy trinity can destabilize countries, even entire regions," Powell writes.

"Despite the stories and images of trouble we read in our newspapers and view on our television screens, this is a time of great opportunities to expand peace, prosperity and freedom," he continues. "The spread of democracy and market economies, combined with breakthroughs in technology, permits us to dream of a day when, for the first time in history, most of humanity will be free of the ravages of tyranny and poverty."

In another article, UNEP executive director Klaus Toepfer argues that failure at the Summit cannot be contemplated, as the risks are too great.

"Unless a new course is chartered for planet Earth we risk a new 'Iron Curtain,' dividing not East and West, but the haves and the have nots - with all the ramifications of increased tensions, jealousies and hatreds between and within countries," Toepfer writes.

Other authors of articles for the magazine include Thabo Mbeki, President of South Africa, which is hosting the Summit from August 26 through September 4 in Johannesburg. Mbeki writes of the need to address the world's existing patterns of production and consumption.

"If the Chinese citizen is to consume the same quantity of crude oil as his or her United States counterpart, China would need over 80 million barrels of oil a day-slightly more than the 74 million barrels a day the world now produces," writes Mbeki.

Fernando Henrique Cardoso, the President of Brazil, writes that hosting the Earth Summit of 1992 has helped his country towards the path of sustainable development. He is convinced that such development is key to a healthy and wealthy society.

"It was gratifying to see the Kyoto Protocol recently receiving the approval of our National Congress in response to strong public demand," Cardoso notes.

Margaret Beckett, the United Kingdom's Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, writes that a global response is needed to fight a variety of ills, including climate change. And Goran Persson, Prime Minister of Sweden, argues that governments need the support of all sectors of society, including the private sector and civil society, to cope with environmental problems.

The special issue of "Our Planet" is expected to be published on August 12.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conservation; development; enviralists; environment; powellwatch; security; sustainability; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: madfly
Did you see this thread? Same old tune.
21 posted on 08/07/2002 11:20:25 AM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marron
What keeps poor countries poor is not access to unapproved technology but rather the lack of liberty, and the absence of clear legal protection for private initiatives.

Stated more clearly, prosperity requires that individuals have liberty to act in their own interest, and honest courts to protect them as they do so.

It is not an accident that poor countries almost without exception have state controlled economies, normally run by an elite for the benefit of that elite.

You are exactly correct IMHO. These points are being glossed over by the very socalist governments (and their liberal media supporters) that do hold their own people down while attacking our free-market system as "not sustainable."

Poverty would disappear rapidly if socialist and/or repressive governments would get out of the way of their own people.

22 posted on 08/07/2002 11:20:53 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
He ran out of straws four or five months ago. The only reason Bowel is in his curent position is because he is a recipient of Republican-style affirmatve action. He is little more than a disgrace.
23 posted on 08/07/2002 11:57:18 AM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
The Colon man is not sustainable, thank God!
24 posted on 08/07/2002 12:05:11 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Database; countrydummy
Thx.
25 posted on 08/07/2002 1:02:30 PM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; madfly; Stand Watch Listen; brityank; OldFriend; Grampa Dave; editor-surveyor; ...
Colon Bowel Alert!
26 posted on 08/07/2002 2:36:41 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Sustainable development? I'll give sustainable development some consideration when we quit allowing millions of foreigners to come here each year. If we have room for them, then sustainable development IS NOT AN ISSUE, IS IT?
27 posted on 08/07/2002 2:41:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
BTTT!!!!!
28 posted on 08/07/2002 2:47:22 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
He is little more than a disgrace.


"Poverty, environmental degradation and despair are destroyers of people, of societies, of nations.

Funny how Colon-boy doesn't mention spreading democratic ideals.

29 posted on 08/07/2002 3:06:40 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Funny how Colon-boy doesn't mention spreading democratic ideals.

You may have a poor opinion of Powell as evidence by the picture, but he did say this, in the next paragraph (I even Bolded the text of the statement).

30 posted on 08/07/2002 3:11:49 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
...but he did say this, in the next paragraph

I did read your bold. I should have bolded "spreading" to make my point. That's the solution as opposed to trying to solve the worlds environmental and economic problems.

What I was trying to say is that by having democratic ideals these problems tend to take care of themselves, as opposed to the world trying to solve the "problems" that come with a free-society as put forth in the China/Oil example.

I realize I don't make myself clear sometimes. Nevermind.

31 posted on 08/07/2002 3:24:46 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Replies too thoughtful to fully digest at work bump!
32 posted on 08/07/2002 3:36:08 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Thanx for the ping.
33 posted on 08/07/2002 4:01:10 PM PDT by dinasour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Sustainable developement is a hoax. - Agreed and I hate to admit I have worked with "Sustainable" types in the past - and I have to say they were idiots - but dangerous!
34 posted on 08/07/2002 4:54:37 PM PDT by Free_at_last_-2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We have heard of late how we are at a disadvantage in the war that has just begun, because in the West we cling to life and comfort at the expense of honor. Our enemies tell us that, and in the telling they barely conceal their enjoyment. Do they really believe this? Because if they do, I have a message for them: The sense of honor in the West may be slow to awaken, but it exists in measures and quantities, when it does awaken, enough to fill the world, as it shall, as it must. How do they think we have come to where we are? How do they think we survived the battles that led to the great revisions in this civilization, its unprecedented turnings, redirections, and rededications -- of which, being entirely unself-critical and subjective, they have not yet had the courage to make even one? They say we have no history. Did we spring from a leaf? How do they think we have come through our five thousand years? Honor. From long familiarity, we know what honor is.

It is what enables the individual to do right in the face of complacency and cowardice. It is what enables the soldier to die alone, the political prisoner to resist, the singer to sing her song, hardly appreciated, on a side street. It is God's valuation and resplendent touch, His gift of strength to those who need it most, when they need it most.

I ask you to defend and protect what is great and good, to choose your battles, but to stand your ground. For little things cascade into big things, and even should the larger battle not go well, hold your position. Even if, in the end, you do not prevail -- though you must -- you will have done right, and the ghosts of those who came before you over many thousands of years, of those who fell unknown and unremembered while doing right, of those who upheld against all pressures and in the face of wounding opposition, will be justly honored, as you will be justly honored, by those who come after you.

Congratulations, and God bless.

Defend Civilization Itself, Mark Helprin.
Antedote to Barbra Streisand. (^:
35 posted on 08/07/2002 6:45:24 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
"Sustainable development" is an oxymoron. My goal is just to get this farm such that I never have to go to the store. That in itself would be quite a feat.

Consumerism is definately a problem. I doubt seriously that any government will solve the problems listed in this article.

36 posted on 08/08/2002 6:00:47 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank; cogitator
The UN, and international NGOs have defined sustainable. It merely means that if you are a sustainable society, you are a socialist society and all private property belongs to NGOs or the government. See, folks who believe in sustainability don't believe that you common people can take care of land or property in the "correct" way. Therefore the government or some annointed land conservancy must take it away and do it for you.

"Sustainable Development is nothing but pure Socialism in a Green cloak. Too many Conservatives throughout the nation are either falling for the deception or ignoring it. This is the current crisis of the Conservative movement. "
--Tom DeWeese

37 posted on 08/08/2002 6:40:48 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
See post #37
38 posted on 08/08/2002 6:44:40 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
What a load of malarkey. The argument is that without government to shepherd the judicious use of resources, free-market economies will strip-mine, clear-cut, and toxic-dump themselves into oblivion. In fact, the opposite is the case. The socialist centrally-planned economies of the Eastern Bloc, the Soviet Union, China, et al. are plagued with pollution, shortages, and crop failures. The free market West, by contrast, enjoys an abundance of greenspace and first order goods.

When individuals are given rights in air, land, and water, tort liability protects and balances those rights. When air, land, and water are considered "public" resources (i.e., owned by noone and everyone), waste and spoilage is the inevitable result.In a society which honors and protects rights in property, mutually antagonistic and/or cooperative exercise of those rights strikes a balance of (guess what?) "sustainable development."

Doubtless, people occupy space, consume resources, and generate pollution. Thus, one threat to "sustainable development" in the United States is the government's importation of large numbers of people (literally millions) and its coercion of non-discrimination and association towards immigrants by native property owners.

39 posted on 08/08/2002 7:20:47 AM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
See, folks who believe in sustainability don't believe that you common people can take care of land or property in the "correct" way.

Do you think that slash-and-burn agricultural practices in rain forests constitute taking care of property the "correct" way?

Here's an example of what such practices look like near Rio Branco, Brazil, which is near the border with northeastern Bolivia.


40 posted on 08/08/2002 7:24:13 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson