Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran's clerics start crackdown
National Post ^ | July 30 2002 | Peter Goodspeed

Posted on 07/30/2002 7:28:11 PM PDT by knighthawk

Tension over U.S. stance: Reformers threaten to withdraw from coalition government

Political tensions in Iran are reaching a turning point as hardline clerical conservatives unleash a new wave of repression, closing liberal newspapers, imprisoning leading dissidents and permanently banning the country's main opposition party.

In a crackdown on reformers grouped around Mohammad Khatami, the President, conservative clerics are using their control of the judiciary and security forces to lash out at critics pushing for democratic reforms and a more secular state.

On the weekend, Iran's feared Revolutionary Court dissolved the country's oldest opposition party, the Freedom Movement, sending 33 of the group's leaders to jail and banning them from political activity for up to 10 years.

The dissidents, many of whom had been detained since 1999 following student pro-democracy riots in Tehran, were charged with a series of crimes, including seeking to topple the country's Islamic government, spreading rumours and lies by giving lectures and interviews and having unauthorized links with foreigners.

Their sudden jailing and the abrupt destruction of their political party came as other conservative clerics ordered the closure of two liberal newspapers and police began arresting and interrogating several leading intellectuals.

The confrontation follows months of conflict between conservatives and reformers over the pace of political change and what Iran's relations should be with the United States as Washington prepares a possible military strike against neighbouring Iraq.

In the wake of the latest crackdown, Iran's biggest reform party, the Participation Front -- headed by Mohammed Reza Khatami, President Khatami's younger brother -- has warned the political situation in Iran is so unstable the movement may withdraw from government entirely in protest. That would throw Iran into chaos and may force a final showdown between conservatives and reformers.

The Participation Front won up to 70% of the votes in Iran's last parliamentary elections and controls five Cabinet posts.

With 130 of 290 seats in a pro-reform parliament, the group has been demanding "the right to call government institutions to account," particularly courts which are controlled by conservative clerics who are accountable only to Iran's spiritual supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"Our continued participation in power and in the state is conditional on the realization of the demand and rights of people," Mr. Khatami told reporters at a news conference in Tehran on Sunday.

"Otherwise, we will reach the point of decision and continue our activities from outside the structure, leaving a power which lacks a sufficient base of legitimacy."

If the Participation Front withdraws from parliament, it would undermine the legitimacy and credibility of Iran's Islamic regime and might force Mr. Khatami's brother, the President, to resign.

President Khatami has said several times he would leave office if he concluded the reform process has become immovably blocked. But so far, he has remained silent on most contentious issues while quietly mediating between reformers and conservatives.

Despite their control of both the presidency and parliament, Iran's reformers have made little headway in the last five years against hardline conservatives who control key institutions, the country's judiciary, security services, the military and state broadcast media.

The small, self-perpetuating circle of hardline clerics, who believe their power and authority comes to them through God, have constantly frustrated reformers who believe it should reside in the Iranian people.

On Sunday, as he threatened to withdraw from parliament, Mr. Khatami said that dual authority has paralyzed Iran and is crippling the country's foreign policy.

He said Iran's relations with the United States have been damaged by domestic political and religious conflict and called for a reduction of tensions.

"The history of Iran-U.S. relations is dark and complicated, but we can't live in the past," Mr. Khatami said. "In the short term, our strategy should be to reduce tensions and in the long term to adopt confidence-building measures toward the United States."

That stands in direct contradiction to everything Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has been preaching.

On the weekend, Ayatollah Khamenei went on national television to justify the latest crackdown, saying dissidents have allied themselves with the United States, which is determined to destroy Iran's Islamic Republic.

"Having given up hope of exerting military or economic pressure, the enemy is trying to drive a wedge between the system and the public, using a propaganda war to make people disillusioned in the Islamic system," he said.

The Ayatollah condemned those who see "capitulating to American bullying" as some sort of "opportunity."

Instead, he warned that, guided by God, he will use his power to intervene if any of the three constitutional institutions in Iran -- the government, judiciary and parliament -- try to divert the system from what he called "its true path."

Iran's Revolutionary Guard, the most radical element in the clerically controlled military, has accused advocates of democracy of being pawns of a U.S. invasion aimed at "challenging the values of the revolution."

George W. Bush, the U.S. President, has designated Iran as part of "an axis of evil" along with Iraq and North Korea.

He further fed conservative Iranian fears three weeks ago when he shifted relations onto a more confrontational path by accusing the Iranian government of ignoring populist demands for change.

Mr. Bush's comments were viewed as an abrupt abandonment of nearly a decade of gentle U.S. diplomacy that tried to engage Iranian reformers in the hope of weakening Iran's fundamentalist leaders.

Inside Iran, conservatives saw Mr. Bush's comments as a signal he thinks their clerical regime is teetering on the brink of collapse and may simply implode if opposition forces receive outside encouragement.

Now, Iran's hard-liners are acting as if they are in trouble, attacking dissidents, closing newspapers, banning opposition parties, threatening a new wave of social repression and declaring all calls for normal relations with the United States are tantamount to treason.

As Iran increasingly looks to be careening toward a constitutional crisis, the former Empress Fara Diba stepped into the controversy, saying Iranians are disillusioned with promises of reform and are anxious "to regain their freedom."

Speaking to reporters in Cairo, where she made her annual visit to the tomb of her husband, the former Shah of Iran, she said the real struggle in Iran is between the people and the current regime.

"I think the quarrel between the so-called radicals [conservatives] and reformers is just a game to prolong the system," she said. "The majority of people have reached the point that they are beyond reforms. What they want is a change of regime."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: clerics; crackdown; hardliners; iran; reformists

1 posted on 07/30/2002 7:28:11 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 07/30/2002 7:28:34 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The US should release an intelligence report doucmenting all the money the mullahs have stashed away and all the national assets they control through their religious "trusts." That should open some eyes. In fact, that's what some of these reformers are obliquely referring to.
3 posted on 07/30/2002 7:34:34 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
We need Jesse Jackson to go there and square those "hot heads" away. After all doesn't he represent someone? He appears to be able to travel for the US where ever he chooses. Like Clinton, he's above the law.
4 posted on 07/30/2002 7:39:28 PM PDT by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
It's interesting to me that the exiled, long-silent Empress Fara Diba is suddenly vocal.

Coincidental? I think not. Really does sound like something is brewing in many places outside of Iran.

Isn't there an heir-presumptive son to the peacock throne lurking somewhere? Heard he's a pretty intelligent good guy.

Maybe some day he'll be baaaaaaack!

Leni

5 posted on 07/30/2002 7:43:01 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
I didn't know she was still alive! Didn't she die a few years ago?
6 posted on 07/30/2002 9:34:47 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; MinuteGal; Joee; Shermy
Here's what our President needs to do:

Use the bully pulpit, and make constant, ideological attacks on the Islamic Republic. We should not get involved with internal Iranian politics. Instead, we should push for the noble ideals of liberty and self-rule.

A revolution may well be on the way. The Iranian people need to be exposed to the ideals of good governance, so that they may recognize their own government for the tyranny that it is. Also, exposure to the the ideals of good governance can help prevent emergence of another tyranny when the Islamic Republic system is toppled.

I applaud our president for many things. One of them was his address to the Iranian people, in which he said that when Iranian people attain their freedom, they will have no better friend than the people of the USA.

Great speech dubya! Keep the pressure on them! When Iran becomes free, maybe our church will send missionaries there.
7 posted on 07/30/2002 9:50:46 PM PDT by parthur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Various articles I have heard and read over the years indicate that many of the citizens of both Iraq and Iran have no quarrel with the US. It would be nice if both countries found their own way to overthrow their oppressive governments.

...Then maybe they could get rid of their fanatic clerics.

8 posted on 07/30/2002 10:01:43 PM PDT by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
hardline clerical conservatives unleash a new wave of repression,

Seems to me, these are "hardline clerical radicals" or "hardline clerical fanatics", with nothing "conservative" about them.

9 posted on 07/31/2002 2:32:55 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsutah
I did a little research on The Empress Farah Diba. It appears she lives in exile in Egypt. However, she moves quietly around the world, speaking for many childrens' causes as well as for freedom and human rights in Iran. She is very popular among expatriate Iranians in the western world who live for the day Iran is free from the icy grip of the Iranian fundamentalists.

Farah was at the Shah of Iran's side when he tried to bring Iran into the modern world. The Shah had granted women social and political rights, including universal suffrage, and the Empress worked on her own to improve the status of the long-suffering, repressed Iranian women.

This modern reform, along with others, enraged the fanatic clerics and the religious establishment, and the rest is history.

The Shah's son, Crown Prince Reza Pahlevi, also exiled into Egypt, completed his higher education in the U.S. He is a Political Science graduate of the University of Southern California.

An accomplished jet fighter pilot, he trained at the former Reese Air Force Base in Lubbock, Texas.

He is married to Princess Yasmine who is a graduate of George Washington School of Law. They have two children and live in Maryland. He is 42 years old.

Prince Pahlevi is a vocal advocate of the principles of freedom, democracy and human rights for his countrymen.

Despite little coverage of the ferment in Iran until recently, the younger generation has been organizing, demonstrating and taking to the streets for some time now for more freedom, human rights and for loosening of the clerics' dictatorial powers. Whether the Pahlevi dynasty will ever return to any kind of power in Iran, no one knows, but it's in the realm of possibility.

Leni

10 posted on 07/31/2002 6:20:16 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Flag to #10.

Leni

11 posted on 07/31/2002 6:22:17 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Thanks for the info. Very interesting. It would be a great thing for Iran if he would be their next leader.
12 posted on 07/31/2002 7:45:20 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson