Posted on 07/29/2002 6:22:25 PM PDT by SBeck
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
BOSTON -- For decades, critics of American culture have written about the sheer insanity of paying a teacher for one year's work what an athlete earns in a day. What utter madness underwrites a culture, these critics aver, that prizes entertainment over education, a society that literally values taking our minds off of important matters rather than learning these important matters in the first place.
(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...
Fire away.
This is an economic fallacy, in that the author confuses marginal value with total value.
Anyway, if market forces choose to value their entertainment over their necesseties, look it as a sign of a very prosperous, capitalist society.
My wife is a by-product of the Montgomery County system (Walt Whitman), she has succeeded massively in everything she has done as a result of the dedicated faculty of that school. Sorry, but your opinion doesn't hold any water with me.
Today public school teachers benefit from a lack of competition. In fact, they spend more time trying to eliminate competition than promoting that basic tenet of American life.
Are American teachers proving themselves? Entrance scores for those entering graduate school as education majors are far, far below those of every other major. It seems to me that more than ever we've proven the old adage that "those who can, do; those who can't, teach."
Typical educator's arrogance. "You got to where you are today because of a TEACHER!"
B.S. - Barbra Streisand!!!
Not to knock teachers, but many of us were born with certain natural abilities that would have manifested themselves regardless of where we attended school. I certainly don't smell what this guy's cookin'!
I've had some very memorable teachers, the ones that left their imprint on me I'm grateful to because they opened the door and I chose to follow a path.
many of us were born with certain natural abilities
Everyone is born with ability, but, to be specific, I don't think anyone is born with an innate ability to string a series of sentences together to form a coherent paragraph or derive a series of functions.
The only legit gripe I can see about money and pro sports is when team owners wheedle tax money out of city governments to build them new stadia.
Teachers sit behind a desk all day.
If you're going to reduce A-Rod's skills, skills he has worked extremely hard at improving, to such a ridiculous amount, then it's only fair to make a similarly ridiculous reduction of what teachers do.
With that in mind, and you're going to have to connect the dots here, I think there's a problem with elevating a stick and ball hitter to prominence, while an obvious idiot just embarrassed the nation with her ignorance on national TV. Education is the cornerstone of national strength; teachers, good teachers, are the key holders to that strength; and, paraphrasing Churchill, there is no better investment that a nation could make than to pour wisdom and knowledge into babies.
My main point on this thread was that it's simply wrong to disparage A-Rod for what he's doing and to have school teachers do the same. The teachers union thrives from lack of competition. They have fought against school vouchers and seem prepared to fight to the death. Less than twenty years ago they fought hard to keep out merit pay. What was the result? There was a huge brain drain in education and many of our most gifted teachers left the profession they loved and public education was suddenly dumbed down.
I have just spent 3 years in a place that you might consider a Utopia. Singapore exalts education far above sports. Men in Singapore do not stand around the water cooler and discuss sports, they discuss how their kids did on their A-levels and what schools they can get into. Education in Singapore is truly a value from the grass roots. It works there because it's what the people want. Teachers are treated with respect because society values education. But you know what? Teacher salaries are not that high. The job of being a teacher is important, but it's not something that is especially difficult.
Let me tell you one reason why I'm a littled miffed at the way the education establishment works here. My wife has a Masters degree in teaching English as a second language. She has worked for several years in that field, mostly in Asia. She was my co-editor of a professional journal in that field and she has helped train many others to teach English as a second language. She's an excellent teacher and I admire her greatly. When we just recently came back to America, she applied for and got a job teaching at a local school, even though she's never been state certified as a public school teacher. She was given starting pay as if she were a new teacher and only provisionally licensed. She was told that she is just about the most qualified ESL teacher in the whole state, but she still has to start as a newbie and take some education courses in the next few years before she can be fully certified. Now think about that. If this job wasn't so ideal for her in many ways, she could simply take her skills and experience elsewhere, outside of the publich school sector, and probably expect something better. The education establishment, incredibly, puts up barriers which keeps out many of the most-qualified teachers, rather than recognizing obvious ability and experience. "If you're not part of our union, then your teaching skills count for nothing."
Sorry for the rant, but you simply didn't seem to see what points I was making before. There's a whole host of reasons why the author of this article just doesn't get it, but maybe he's blinded by his own bitterness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.