Posted on 07/28/2002 1:17:17 PM PDT by scripter
MEN:
- A 1997 study in British Columbia found the life expectancy of men who engage in sodomy to be comparable to that of the average Canadian man in 1871. Researchers estimate that nearly half of the 20 year old men currently engaging in sodomy will not reach their 65th birthday.1
- Ninety-five percent or more of the AIDS infections among gay men result from receptive anal intercourse.2
- The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. A Michigan homosexual newspaper admits there is no such thing as "safe sex" to prevent this "soaring" cancer risk. Condoms offer only limited protection.3 - Homosexual men face a significantly higher risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.4 - Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS. Men who commit acts of sodomy with men have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid, extensive transmission of STDs. Control of STDs is a central component of HIV infection prevention in the United States; resurgence of bacterial STDs threatens national HIV infection prevention efforts.5 - Anal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is nearly universal among HIV-positive homosexual or bisexual men and about 60% in HIV-negative men exhibiting the same sexual behavior.6 WOMEN: - Many innocent victims suffer the health consequences associated with sodomy as a result of blood transfusions, rape and having normal sexual relations with those who have committed unnatural relations with others. While men of all ages who commit sodomy with other men remain at an alarming risk, young bisexual men are said to be a significant "bridge" for HIV transmission to women.7 - Women who commit sex acts with other women face a significantly higher risk of bacterial vaginosis, breast cancer and ovarian cancer than heterosexual women.8 - The spread of Human Papilomavirus (HPV) is not prevented by condoms. The persons most susceptible to cancer associated with HPV are young women (under 20) and people who practice anal intercourse.9 - Women who engage in receptive anal sex are at a higher risk for contracting anal cancer. In fact, in the U.S. general population, anal cancer is more prevalent among women than men — between 1.5 and 2 times more common, perhaps because more women than men engage in receptive anal sex.10
| Sex Practice: | Potential Consequences: |
| 1. Close Body Contact | 1. Pubic lice 2. Scabies (mites) 3. Fungal Infections |
| 2. Performer of Oral Sex | 1. Oral gonorrhea 2. Oral lesions from herpes, HPV (warts), chancroid, lymhogranuloma venereum, or granuloma inguinale. 3. Nongonolococcal pharyngitis from chlamydia, other STD's 4. Syphilis 5. Hepatitis B 6. Enteric (intestinal) infections |
| 3. Receptive Anal Intercourse | 1. Traumatic proctitis 2. Rectal gonorrhea 3. Anal warts 4. HIV/AIDS 5. Nonspecific procitis (from chlamydia and other STDs) 6. Anorectal herpes 7. Anorectal syphilis 8. Hepatitis B 9. Rectal trichomoniasis 10. Lymphogranuloma venereum 11. Anorectal granuloma inguinale 12. Anorectal chancroid 13. Cytomegalovirus 14. Anorectal candidiasis |
| 4. Receptive Manual-Anal Intercourse | 1. Enteric (intestinal) infections |
| 5. Receiver of Oral Sex | 1. Physical abrasions 2. Bites 3. Herpes 4. Urethritis from various STDs |
| 6. Insertive Anal Intercourse | 1. Nongonococcal urethritis 2. Genital herpes 3. Molluscum contagiosum 4. Genital warts 5. Syphilis 6. Trichomoniasins 7. Epididymitis and/or proctitis 8. Fungal infections 9. Lymphogranuloma vencreum 10. Granuloma inguinale 11. Chancroid 12. Hepatitis B 13. HIV/AIDS |
| 7. Oral-anal Intercourse | 1. Enteric (intestinal) infections 2. Shigellosis 3. Campylobacter fetus (bacteria) 4. Enterogenic E. coli bacteria 5. Hepatitis (A, B, and others) 6. Amebiasis 7. Giardiasis 8. Salmonellosis 9. Enterobius vermicularis (parasite) 10. Oral warts 11. Oral gonorrhea 12. Syphilis 13. Lymphogranuloma venereum 14. Oral granuloma inguinale 15. Oral chancroid 16. HIV/AIDS 17. Herpes 18. Anorectal meningococcal infection |
1. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 657-661, "Modelling the Impact of HIV Disease on Mortality in Gay and Bisexual Men."
2. Michael Fumento, "AIDS: Are heterosexuals at Risk?" Commentary 84, (November, 1987) pp. 22-23.
3. Between the Lines, "Anal Cancer and You," Sept. 29, 2000.
4. Medical Institute of Sexual Health, "Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality," 1999.
5. Centers for Disease Control, "Resurgent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Among Men Who Have Sex With Men," September 10, 1999.
6. Infectious Disease News, "Because of HPV, anal cancer screening indicated for certain high-risk groups," October, 1997
7. Manila Bulletin (Philippines), "Bisexuals Serve as 'Bridge' Infecting Women With HIV," July 30, 2000
8. Medical Institute of Sexual Health, "Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality," 1999.
9. WebMD Forum: "HPV and Cervical Cancer with John R. Diggs, Jr., M.D.," April 7, 2000.
10. Infectious Disease News, "Because of HPV, anal cancer screening indicated for certain high-risk groups," October, 1997
11. DG & Altman Ostrow, "Homosexual Behavior and Sexually Transmitted Diseases." New York: McGraw Hill, 1990. pp. 61-69.
Never claimed it was. If you're talking about the Catholic Church thing, 95% of the molestation cases were NOT pedophilia (relations with a pre-pubescent kid). They were molestations by homosexual priests against teenage (and sexually mature) boys. Many, many homosexual men are attracted sexually to teenage boys. 90% of the teenage prostitution in New York City involves teenage boys selling themselves to homosexual men. Homosexual publications and websites are full of stories and pictures involving teenage boys. The same are full of solicitations for sex with teenage boys. In general, teenage boys are unsafe around homosexual men. My sons are a thousand times safer in the Boy Scouts than with priests in the Catholic Church.
A friend of mine who is an ER nurse says the latest fad is cell phones, with the ringer set to vibrate ... can you hear me now?
I don't. I have not talked about pedophilia (involving pre-pubescent kids) at all. But again, in the Catholic Church scandal, a MINORITY of priests (homosexuals) brought about 95% of the molestation cases against teenage boys. Clearly, there is a vastly higher likelihood of a teenage boy being molested by a homosexual man than of a teenage girl being molested by a heterosexual man. The numbers speak for themselves.
It's filthy and disgusting when (as is the case with the majority of homosexual men - as shown by CDC statistics), love turns into humping another man's rectum. The vast majority of people know a serious psychological problem when they see it.
Center for Disease Control statistics show that the majority of homosexual men engage in anal intercourse, the vast majority of homosexual men have promiscuous sex with anonymous partners, about 1/3 of homosexual men engage in sexual practices in which feces and urine are ingested (swallowed), about 1/3 engage in sado-masochistic practices, etc. etc. I have compassion for men who are compelled to do such things. But it is clearly a mental disorder. The vast, vast majority of people understand that - and they don't buy the 'homosexuality is normal' bit. It isn't.
There are plenty of liers on both sides of this. I personally believe there are a lot more on the homosexual side. I'm sure you'll disagree!
Therapists who treat men and women struggling with same-sex attractions say that there are several consistent factors that contribute to the emergence of homosexuality: gender confusion in childhood, a failure to internalize maleness, and sexual abuse by a same-sex predator. Dr. Gregory Dickson, whose doctoral thesis is on the relationship between a mother and son in the development of homosexuality, found that 49% of the homosexuals he surveyed said they had been molested, compared to less than 2% of heterosexuals. Other research confirms what therapists have known for decades: Homosexuals are made, not born. And they are frequently “made” by older men who molest them as youngsters. Counselor Dr. Robert Hicks, author of The Masculine Journey has some sobering thoughts on the real origins of homosexual attractions: “…In counseling gay men for twenty years, I have not had one yet whom I would say had a normative childhood or normative adolescent development in the sexual arena. More often than not I have found stories of abusive, alcoholic, or absent (physically and emotionally) fathers; stories of incest or first experiences of sex forced upon them by older brothers, neighborhood men, or even friends. I sometimes find these men have been early exposure to pornography….” It is worth repeating: Homosexuals are made, not born.
Many times it is -- as documented here, and in the threads:
Hey - I'm tolerant of homosexuals - to the degree they leave me and my kids alone. BUT THEY DON'T. They scream that they should teach their gay ideology stuff to my kids in school, that they should be allowed to take my sons out on overnight campouts in the scouts (yeah, right!), and they have forced me and millions of other parents in the Catholic Chruch to keep their kids away from all priests. For those who don't do these things, I'm perfectly tolerant, and so is everyone else I know. That's different from understanding (as those same tolerant people do) that humping another man's rear end is a mental disorder. It is. You confuse tolerance with understanding the true nature of things. They are not at all the same.
Hehehe…cite the study or shut up.
Put a little yellow sticky on each copy informing them that you have sent copies to ten?,eleven?other diocesan officials for their elucidation. To strike a little more fear in them,you could add the heads of some parent/teacher associations as well as a couple of principals of catholic schools.If you just send those to pastors or assistant pastors,pta heads and prinipals randomly,it is very effective.The good ones appreciate it and the bad ones don't know who sent it,why it was sent and who else received it.It also puts some of them in a tizzy because to bring it up if people have not received it might give it extra publicity and not wanted and yet they are always trying to figure out what moves the enemy (us) are making.The more time they have to spend worrying the less time they have to plot and deconstruct.
First of all, sex is not sodomy. But of course they aren’t, if they don’t act on their paraphilia where is the disorder? Do you know anything about paraphilia?
The APA makes a clear distinction between pedophilia and other sexual disorders and homosexuality.
Ohhh? What distinction is that? Both were paraphilias before 1974 and one isn’t now. The only distinction is that one can claim psychosocial stability and the other can’t, can you explain why? I’m going to guess you can’t so let me help you. Because the APA decided with no scientific evidence, to make homosexuality politically acceptable and end discrimination. But you’ll notice they made no effort to do so for cross dressers, bestials, incestuals, pedophiles, voyeurs, S&M…and on and on. They are hypocrites to protect one perversion over another because they are disproportionately, as an organization, homosexually staffed. Have you ever read the bio’s for the members of Division 44, 60+% of the ones I’ve read are openly homosexual? Both APA’s are self-serving organizations when it comes to staffing the divisions and committees that make policy.
They also say there's no scientific evidence that conversion theropy works.
Ummm…the evidence is objective, if they don’t practice perversion then it works, n’est pas?
I like the way you think! I'll be considering your idea.
Best personal regards.
Shalom back at ya, ArGee.
No, or if I do, its the same as yours ... you basically agree with what I said in your later responses.
Is it your custom to offer "canned ham" responses even where they don't fit ?
This is where I disagree with you. Husbands and wives can do a lot of things in a safe way as long as they are faithful to each other. They don't need to stick to coitus in the missionary position and they don't need to sleep in separate beds.
If I missed you being facetious (sp?) please forgive me.
Shalom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.