Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton bashes Bush for lack of focus on AIDS
The Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 7/24/02 | Kate N. Grossman

Posted on 07/24/2002 11:03:08 AM PDT by GeneD

Former President Bill Clinton took several swipes here Tuesday at the Bush administration for focusing on the war against terrorism at the expense of the deepening AIDS epidemic.

"I'm all for fighting in Afghanistan . . . but no one believes that we can build a safe world just by preventing and punishing bad things," Clinton said at the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's annual convention. "We have to make some good things happen."

Clinton also talked about the choices confronting a former president over the role he should play in his post-White House years.

A former president can either "be a has-been and play golf and pretend you were a Republican, even if you weren't," Clinton told a roomful of 1,600 diners at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, who chuckled in response. "Or you have to find some way to be useful."

"So what you do," a relaxed Clinton said, "is swap power for influence."

Clinton has picked several issues to take on, including economic opportunity for the poor, ending religious and racial strife in the Middle East and Northern Ireland, and AIDS prevention and eradication.

He heads the International AIDS Trust, which raises money to fight AIDS, and just returned from the international AIDS conference in Barcelona, Spain.

"Our goal has to be to solve it, reverse it and end it," Clinton said after sounding a United Nations warning that AIDS could kill 70 million by 2020.

"And this is a disease that's 100 percent preventable," Clinton said, noting advances in prevention and treatment that have yet to reach many parts of the developing world. Women and children now account for a significant number of new infections.

In Africa, only one in a thousand infected receive the drugs they need, said Clinton, who shared the podium with the first ladies of Nigeria and Haiti, countries hit hard by the AIDS epidemic.

Clinton said fighting AIDS will give desperate countries an economic and humanitarian lift.

Without help "you're going to have millions of young boys that are more than happy enough to be mercenaries or terrorists because they'll think they'll be dead in a year or two."

Clinton urged world leaders to spend the $10 billion a year recommended by experts to fight AIDS globally, with the United States contributing about $2 billion. The United States now spends up to $1 billion on worldwide anti-AIDS efforts.

"That sounds like a lot of money," Clinton said. "But it's less than two months of the Afghan war."

U.S. officials said they are doubling international spending on AIDS in the next 18 months. At the AIDS conference in Spain, they described a new $500 million program aimed at preventing mother-to-child transmission and improving health care delivery in Africa and the Caribbean.

President Bush also has pledged $500 million to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, a quarter of the fund's pledges and more than any other nation, U.S. officials said.

America's total spending on AIDS/HIV this year is more than $16 billion, up from $14.2 billion two years ago, with most spent in the United States.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; aids; billlegacyclinton; georgewbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2002 11:03:08 AM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
When will this creature go away?
2 posted on 07/24/2002 11:06:16 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Like he did anything about that stuff when he was president. What a jerk.
3 posted on 07/24/2002 11:07:01 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I despise clintbilly and his evil wife with every fiber of my being.
4 posted on 07/24/2002 11:07:23 AM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
This creature will get more and more pathetic as he hungers for attention.
5 posted on 07/24/2002 11:07:40 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
It will take an excorcism. He is Beelzebubba.
6 posted on 07/24/2002 11:09:14 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Let's see, the disease started in Africa, the treatments comes from U.S. science, but the U.S. "owes" the Africans? We're spending more on AIDS treatment overseas than we did 2 years ago, when Clinton was President, but of course "it's not enough." Perhaps we'll need an HIV-positive President before the President can really "feel our pain," but with Clinton out of office, that seems unlikely.
7 posted on 07/24/2002 11:09:31 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Would you put him in charge of ANY trust?
8 posted on 07/24/2002 11:09:33 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"I'm all for fighting in Afghanistan . . . but no one believes that we can build a safe world just by preventing and punishing bad things," Clinton said

Yeah, but it's a good start. Ya should have tried it occasionally during your frickin' eight years in office.

Clinton also talked about the choices confronting a former president over the role he should play in his post-White House years.

A former president can either "be a has-been and play golf and pretend you were a Republican, even if you weren't," Clinton told a roomful of 1,600 diners at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, who chuckled in response. "Or you have to find some way to be useful."

Slick, we'll deal with it if you stick to golfing. Be sure to invite OJ and the Rodham brothers from time to time, you'll make a splendid foursome. Now I'd much rather you take a taxpayer-paid vacation at Leavenworth, but I'll settle for you golfing the rest of your sorry life away...

9 posted on 07/24/2002 11:09:58 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Now we have two jimmy carters...amy's too!
10 posted on 07/24/2002 11:10:12 AM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Clinton's comments reflect the view that an issue is only important if it has the President's attention and if the President has made a "ground-breaking" and "breathtaking" address on the matter within the last 3 weeks.

Furthermore, as other posters on other threads have pointed out, this speech by Clinton is part of a wide-scale plan to disrupt the approval ratings currently enjoyed by President Bush. Whatever Bush is not talking about, the Dems will point out that Bush is overlooking, not caring, etc.

11 posted on 07/24/2002 11:10:16 AM PDT by Remole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
It will take an excorcism. He is Beelzebubba.

That or a Minuteman out of Minot.

12 posted on 07/24/2002 11:10:38 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
One wonders what an ex-prez is doing in attempting to diminish the war on terrorism in favor of appeasing the AIDS special interest groups. I mean--how creepy can a perjured, unable to practice law, disgraced, arrogant, creepy, pasty ex-president be?
Could it be that dreams of campaign cash rolling in from homosexual special interest groups is his primary goal?
Or could it be that he misses the spotlight?
Could it be that he is jealous of President Bush's determination to fight terror and wants to tear if apart?
Perhaps billy, himself has contacted AIDS along with all of his other suspected STD battles?
Golly------is ol billie willy searching for an issue to grasp onto that would make him appear more CONCERNED about American welfare that President Bush?

Isn't billy boy just a supremo piglet?

13 posted on 07/24/2002 11:11:48 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Based on the number of people with the disease in the U.S., AIDS already gets much more than its share of federal spending.

I must have missed it, so tell me again: Why should a disease resulting from life style choices get special emphasis?

(I'm sure its not because of special interest politics... )

14 posted on 07/24/2002 11:12:09 AM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Bill, consider that your own behavior will probably contribute more to the spread of STDs than anything the Bush Administration might do to try to stop this spread. You are so full of yourself that your catching of any of these diseases is probably the only thing that makes you realize it. But then again, I doubt that.
15 posted on 07/24/2002 11:12:20 AM PDT by Corporate Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"So what you do," a relaxed Clinton said, "is swap power for influence."

This guy is so irrelevant. Ho-hum.

16 posted on 07/24/2002 11:12:30 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
He could contribute his part to the "fight against aids" by lopping it off.
17 posted on 07/24/2002 11:13:13 AM PDT by Rollee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Former President Bill Clinton took several swipes here Tuesday at the Bush administration for focusing on the war against terrorism at the expense of the deepening AIDS epidemic.

What else would one expect from a Democrat, and especially the Slickmeister? The action in Afghanistan is the United States protecting itself against its enemies and is a legitimate use of federal power. The AIDS epidemic is the most avoidable epidemic in human history, and could be ended if people exercised self-control and resonsibility for their own actions - but since they won't, Clinton feels it is the responsibility of government to save them from their own folly. Talk about a completely skewed value system...

18 posted on 07/24/2002 11:14:57 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Let me get this straight.

Our government, using the threat of its monopoly on the legal use of deadly force to take money from people who earn it.

Then, this money is to be given to people who, despite education on the subject, continue to contemptuously behave in a manner that spreads a deadly plague.

And, we're to keep on throwing this money down the rat hole that is Africa.

I presented this argument to a leftist. He responded that "we can't just turn a blind eye!"
19 posted on 07/24/2002 11:16:30 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The sorry has been is hoping for a cure before he croaks.

20 posted on 07/24/2002 11:16:39 AM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson