Posted on 07/23/2002 4:06:13 AM PDT by kattracks
(CNSNews.com) - The objectivity of CBS News anchor Charles Osgood and the network itself is being questioned following Osgood's appearances at several fundraising events for The Nature Conservancy (TNC). One critic labels the environmental group "ideologically extreme" for its attempts to "control all waterways in the U.S."
Critics also point to a $15,000 grant that the charitable arm of CBS Corp. awarded to The Nature Conservancy as additional proof of a "cozy" relationship between the two organizations.
Osgood and CBS' relationship with The Nature Conservancy are detailed in documents and exclusive interviews obtained by CNSNews.com.
Osgood admitted there is a "sense of kinship" between The Nature Conservancy and CBS News Sunday Morning, which he said pre-dates 1994, when he began hosting the program.
"I think we all have tried to be cooperative and helpful with people doing good work and I think very seldom does that compromise you," said Osgood, who has won several Peabody Awards for his broadcasts.
CBS News Sunday Morning has a Christmas season segment titled, "Our Gifts to Us," which Osgood described as "things that have been added to our national parks through The Nature Conservancy during the course of the year."
And Osgood also praised the environmental group's work during one of his "Osgood File" radio commentaries in March 2000.
The Nature Conservancy refers to itself as "nature's real estate agent." Celebrity activist Paul Newman and his wife Joanne Woodward are among those involved in the TNC's work.
'A Piece of Bird Seed'
Osgood described the CBS philanthropic arm's gift of $15,000 to the TNC as "paltry."
"When you are talking about CBS, you are talking about a piece of bird seed," Osgood stated.
He added, "What I find interesting is that somebody thinks that $15,000 is going to make any difference to anybody at CBS or for that matter The Nature Conservancy."
"It seems a pretty paltry sum to me," Osgood said.
According to documents obtained by CNSNews.com, the CBS Foundation gave at least two grants of $7,500 in both 1998 and 1999 to the Nature Conservancy of New York, N.Y. "to provide support for the Conservation Internships for Inner-City Youth Program."
Former CBS News President and executive Howard Stringer, credited with bringing David Letterman to the network, is listed as a member of the TNC's board of governors.
Crossing the Line?
In October of 2001, Osgood served as master of ceremonies for the TNC's fund-raiser and awards dinner.
"[Osgood] is great. He spoke at the annual meeting," said Richard Weinstein, state chairman of Florida's Nature Conservancy. Osgood, who was not paid for his appearance, presented the TNC's "National Hero" award to Weinstein at the Oct. 4 event in Orlando, Florida.
"[Osgood's] a wonderful guy, terrific guy ... he emceed the events in which they introduced the people that were being honored and introduced a film and he talked and he's wonderful," Weinstein said.
When asked about the Florida fundraiser, Osgood admitted, "I made some remarks and presented an award."
Osgood also conceded that he has also appeared "every so often" at the conservancy's "Last Great Places" events in Central Park in New York City. According to Osgood, Stringer "was the one who asked me if I would do this ..."
The TNC was also the focus of at least one of Osgood's CBS Radio Network commentaries, "The Osgood File." In the report, Osgood praised the efforts of the TNC for its "conservation" methods involving "no-till" farming in Fish Creek, bordering Indiana and Ohio.
According to Osgood, Fish Creek's mussel population is now recovering and the "creek is slowly coming back to life" because of the conservancy's efforts.
Ivan Osorio, a research associate with the Capital Research Center, a Washington, D.C. based public policy group that monitors charitable giving, believes CBS News has a conflict of interest regarding The Nature Conservancy.
"It brings into question CBS News's objectivity regarding environmental reporting, when you have got this cozy relationship with The Nature Conservancy," Osorio said.
When asked about his involvement with the TNC, Osgood became defiant.
"You can't possibly hope to navigate public affairs over 35 years or 50 years or any other period of time without pissing somebody off because you have said something that they don't like, or they don't like environmentalists or whatever their problem is," Osgood stated.
"If you fail to do anything good because somebody might disapprove, I think that would be very inhibiting indeed," he added.
Osgood said he had no idea that anyone opposed the TNC's methods of securing land and water for natural preservation.
"I was not aware that there was anything controversial about that ... I didn't even realize that anybody was against that," he said.
'Deliberate Ignorance'
"For a reporter, that is deliberate ignorance," countered Ron Arnold, author of Undue Influence, which details the activities of the TNC.
"[Osgood] is simply not doing his journalistic duty to even ask the question," Arnold said. "People have been crying at the top of their lungs for so many years about the [The Nature Conservancy], he added.
Arnold cited one instance where the TNC's goals of land acquisition were at odds with the farming community of Little Darby Creek Ohio.
"They have completely killed [the farmer's] property rights," he said.
Arnold, who also serves as the vice president of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, said the TNC "virtually lives in the hip pocket of the federal government."
The TNC had assets of over $2.8 billion and annual revenues of nearly $800 million in 2000, making it the wealthiest green group in the world according to Arnold.
"These guys are rich beyond the dreams of avarice," Arnold said.
The TNC is working with governments at all levels to accelerate the transfer of private lands into public ownership, according to Arnold.
"Socialist countries have less [government] land ownership than the U.S.," he insisted.
Arnold believes private owners are better stewards of the land than governments.
Barry Clausen, environmental expert and author of the book Burning Rage, which details the activities and agenda of the environmental movement, called the TNC's political ideology "extreme."
"They want to control land, control water and they are being very successful because of the money they get," Clausen told CNSNews.com.
"The frustration and anger by so many people in rural America is now being directed toward The Nature Conservancy," Clausen said.
Weinstein defended the TNC's partnerships with the federal government, stating "we protect the land we acquire ... we can do it better in partnerships of all kinds."
A CBS corporate spokesman said the CBS Foundation has been absorbed into Viacom since the merger between the two corporations in 1999. Details about the relationship between CBS and the Nature Conservancy and the grants were not provided after repeated attempts for information.
E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
How about The Wildlands Project? That's extreme. TNC was instrumental in funding it.
Shall I go on?
Go on all you want. If you want to convince me that I am wrong though... you are going to have to put more thought into it than rattling off website names. Are you making allegations about NC?? - If so, name them, prove them... I am not going to do the research for your allegation.
If you know of sins NC is committing, name them.
I cant explain it, I don't know about it. Apparently you do... Is this a test? - Are you trying to convince me that you are right, or just setting us up as adversaries? - I am not an adversary, but a possible ally. I am listening, sell your thinking to me.
I will not do your homework for you. I pointed you in the direction. It is up to you to learn the truth.
Ahhh. I see. So it's a matter of degrees. Osgood labels it a paltry sum so that makes it ok.
BTW kattracks, good post. You've been hitting them out of the park lately.
Also, in Washington State, there was a fire that was burning and about 10 firefighters were sent in to fight it. Four ended up dying because bureaucrats in DC dithered over scooping up water out of a local creek (there was a possibility of scooping up a fish that was endangered). The four made tents in the forest to try and survive after they were cut off from safety by the fire.
They were immolated.
If I provided you a series of oversimplified examples, you would "what if" them to death, or keep asking for more proof, and ask me to keep digging for you. Then you would walk out, "not convinced." Meanwhile, I invested $300,000 of my own money in putting that case together in as concise and readable form as I could. In it, I showed the misbegotten results of the environmental movement and how the system benefits wealthy investors using tax-exempt funds at public expense. I isolated the philosophical and economic principles involved and proposed an alternative system, showed how it might work, suggested an implementation strategy, and stated in unmistakable terms what is at stake if we don't do something about the environmental movement soon. I even gave you a source of free samples.
You want it all for free, you want it simple, and are too lazy to go read the freebies. All are typical of an urban environmentalist land-thief. You clearly don't care enough about nature or your freedom to make such an investment and I won't waste more valuable time trying to convince someone incapable of doing their homework.
No, but you might get me interested in your ideas and why you think the way you do. I am neither urban or lazy. Only pressed for time and hopeful that all of you who seem to know so much about the evil of NC could give me so much as a paragraph describing the scene. Until this morning I didn't even know their name, only heard about their concept. a few hours later, after asking you to describe your your claim that they are corrupt, I am lazy if I have not already bought a book on the subject. Excuse me.... I was working in between.
Wasn't Americans getting a $350 check called "extreme"?
Calling Ann Couler! Calling Ann Coulter!
I was re-reading this thread, and saw your post.
Let's be clear that the villain here is not the Nature Conservancy, tho clearly that point can be argued by principled people.
The villainy here is the Federal Government.
There is much to learn. Unfortunately, we (at least I) live in a country where the press is supine on matters like this.
FRmail my friend Carry_Okie (Mark) about this. Dave
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.