Skip to comments.
Nazism is Left-Wing?
chuckmorse.com ^
| July 2, 2002
| Chuck Morse
Posted on 07/08/2002 1:02:47 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
The other old left-wing canard Jensen tossed out during the interview was that America was the most militarily oriented society in history. Maybe that's true, if those in the dustbin of history don't count. But if they do, there is no example of a Communist country that spent less of its GDP on arms than the U.S. 'Course some of them were pretty good at cooking the books to disguise that fact, but . . .
To: Tailgunner Joe
It is much easier than that - left simply calls 'right-wing' everybody it does not like, e.g. term 'right-wing communists' was widely used to describe cituation in Eastern Europe in the early 90s.
3
posted on
07/08/2002 1:09:59 PM PDT
by
alex
To: Tailgunner Joe
Excellent points.
The Chinese Communists are no longer communists at all. They are fascists.
4
posted on
07/08/2002 1:10:36 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Tailgunner Joe
the fascist system ... differs with communism in that communism abolishes the corporation outright.
And it is a difference without meaning, I believe.
Fascism, socialism, and communism are interchangeable at the flick of the leader's pen.
5
posted on
07/08/2002 1:11:48 PM PDT
by
polemikos
To: Dog Gone
My point in post 5 exactly.
6
posted on
07/08/2002 1:14:15 PM PDT
by
polemikos
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Trying to classify as liberal or conservative a political system that defies categorization has to rank up there as one of the truly dumb arguments of the week. I suppose by Morse's definition anarchists are the ultimate conservatives since they believe in the least government?
To: Non-Sequitur
Your screen name is well-deserved.
To: Non-Sequitur
I suppose by Morse's definition anarchists are the ultimate conservatives since they believe in the least government? I would say that anarchists represent the extreme right not the ultimate conservative.
Communism, Facism, Socialism, these are at the extreme left.
9
posted on
07/08/2002 1:24:52 PM PDT
by
Strider
To: Non-Sequitur
That's a non-sequitur, Non-Sequitur.
To: Tailgunner Joe
Something makes me think that yours is, too.
To: Non-Sequitur
Thank You. Unlike you, I can take that as a compliment.
To: Dog Gone
FL Hayek in his book "The Road to Serfdom" comes to the simple conclusion that Communism evolves into Fascism once the idealistic Marxists realize the impossibility of their utopian dream.
The Fascists are at least a little more intellectually honest. They realize from the start that some folks are "a little more equal" than others....and proceed from there.
13
posted on
07/08/2002 1:30:18 PM PDT
by
Victor
To: alex
It is much easier than that - left simply calls 'right-wing' everybody it does not like, e.g. term 'right-wing communists' was widely used to describe cituation in Eastern Europe in the early 90s. And now that the press seems to understand that Communists are "left-wing," they don't use a "wing" label, but merely call them "conservatives."
To: Victor; Non-Sequitur; Strider; polemikos; Dog Gone; conservatism_IS_compassion
It should be pointed out that the 'utopian dream' of the Marxists is in fact, Anarchy. They envision a world without nations, religions, or money. Of course this will only happen after the 'withering away' of the 'proletarian dictatorship', once its destructive power is no longer needed.
So, no, anarchists are not right wing. They are left wing. Lawlessness is always left wing. Liberal is a synonym of licentious.
To: Tailgunner Joe
Fascist regimes granted monopoly control over specific areas of industry... Like health care and "controlled substances," for instance.
There is a direct correlation between spiraling drug costs and the monopolies granted to drug manufacturers by the controlled substance laws, but the rabid drug warriors will say it is a small price to pay.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
That line stood out as especially silly. Jensen should first consider Prussia. The United States are hardly militaristic compared to Prussia.
To: Victor
I have not read "The Road to Serfdom", but I think I should. Margaret Thatcher credits it with changing her thinking about economies, and Hayek's book eventually won out over Keynesian economics.
18
posted on
07/08/2002 1:49:43 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Tailgunner Joe
Morse makes an important point about how the Nazis rolled major corporations into government client entities. What is scary is that this same kind of goverment/corporate "partnering" is a included feature in the growth of big government in America. The expanding cenrtral goverment is gaining more and more control over what used to be free enterprise through increasing use of forded incentives and manipulative regulations.
To: alex
Exactly. I remember reading in the NY Times about how the "liberal" forces of reform in the USSR were battling to wrest power from the "conservatives" who sought to keep the power in the hands of the government.
I thought maybe I was holding the paper upside-down.
20
posted on
07/08/2002 1:59:12 PM PDT
by
dead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson